Posted by Lensman as regards sexeducation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • theking
    Nice Kitty
    • Sep 2002
    • 21053

    #1

    Posted by Lensman as regards sexeducation

    I haven't seen any child porn on any his stuff. I didn't see any in smokey's email.

    And no one else has been able to forward me any proof on this guy.

    And Groove basically called me a pedo in the thread title, so I guess it backfired on him.


    With everyone talking about proof of this and proof of that...apparently not a single one that claims to have proof...can provide proof to the owner of this board.

    What does that say about all of you that claim to have proof? I know what your claims of proof say to me.

    Pig shit.
    When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

    FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
  • klik
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2001
    • 5092

    #2
    i wish my ignore list could ignore the threads about him..

    Comment

    • sarettah
      see you later, I'm gone
      • Oct 2002
      • 14349

      #3
      All cookies cleared!

      Comment

      • Jace
        FBOP Class Of 2013
        • Jan 2004
        • 35562

        #4
        i have no idea about the pedo thing, i just know he is annoying...prolly way more than lawrenceC ever got....

        and definately not an adult webmaster, which I thought lensman was also cracking down on

        there seems to be no consistency with this board...one day he bans for someone not being a webmaster, then one day you don';t have to be a webmaster

        Comment

        • smack
          Push Porn Like Weight.
          • Mar 2002
          • 10652

          #5
          sig placement.
          Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.

          Comment

          • sicone
            Retired
            • Jan 2004
            • 18453

            #6
            Originally posted by sarettah
            Thats the closest thing to proof that I have seen since the day I joined the board here

            Comment

            • WickedVenus
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2004
              • 3877

              #7
              Originally posted by sarettah

              wow thats major proof right there!!!

              SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.

              Comment

              • Jace
                FBOP Class Of 2013
                • Jan 2004
                • 35562

                #8
                Originally posted by WickedVenus
                wow thats major proof right there!!!

                hahahahaha...oh shit...that is a great graphic

                Comment

                • baddog
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Apr 2001
                  • 107089

                  #9
                  URL is 404 so really you are assuming things by the URL

                  Comment

                  • irishfury
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 2611

                    #10
                    Originally posted by WickedVenus
                    wow thats major proof right there!!!


                    Wow I busted gut to that one
                    Trust no one there all snakes

                    Comment

                    • sarettah
                      see you later, I'm gone
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 14349

                      #11
                      Originally posted by baddog
                      URL is 404 so really you are assuming things by the URL
                      at best it is a piss poor choice of terms to be using in a website directory structure. It definitely appers that he was using tactics that most of us know are designed to attract one particular audience to the site. Much like these:

                      All cookies cleared!

                      Comment

                      • foolio
                        ICQ: 178725656
                        • Nov 2002
                        • 12366

                        #12
                        Originally posted by sarettah

                        Ok, so lets say I made a url like this

                        whateveryouwant.com/sarettah_fucking_dog_in_ass_and_licking_horse_dick/cumshot-1.jpg

                        that would mean you did all that right?

                        Comment

                        • SmokeyTheBear
                          ►SouthOfHeaven
                          • Jun 2004
                          • 28609

                          #13
                          Originally posted by baddog
                          URL is 404 so really you are assuming things by the URL
                          The child porn was pulled picture by picture from the archie servers as it was reported..

                          Originally posted by sexeducation


                          If this censored graphic of a Russian advertisement is considered child pornography then I request the deletion of my Adult.com accounts and the termination of Archive.org as there is NO EXCUSE for posting child pornography.

                          BOTH MUST OCCUR THOUGH ...

                          Both Archives.org and SexEducation.com must be terminated.

                          However, if you feel that in some situations that CP must be discussed ... if you believe in free speech ...

                          Then you must answer the question - where?

                          I believe on the world's busiest adult webmaster board .. that under certain situations - Adult.com MUST allow the discussion of this most controversial subject ...

                          otherwise ... we can not teach those entering the biz about it ...

                          On my website - I would NOT attempt that type of discussion.
                          On SexEducation.com ALL GRAPHICS WILL BE 2257 compliant ...

                          Here though ...

                          I have questions about that?

                          Not the big mouths ...
                          but does the Adult.com community agree with that?

                          = = = = =
                          here is the final post ...
                          I wasn't done writing the "article" before the 5 min time limit was up ...
                          hatisblack at yahoo.com

                          Comment

                          • sarettah
                            see you later, I'm gone
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 14349

                            #14
                            Originally posted by foolio
                            Ok, so lets say I made a url like this

                            whateveryouwant.com/sarettah_fucking_dog_in_ass_and_licking_horse_dick/cumshot-1.jpg

                            that would mean you did all that right?
                            Not at all. But it would indicate, imo, that you were at the least trying to get picked up by the SEs for those terms in some manner. Or it could be an accurate description of the folder content for all I know. I don't remember the 70's very well
                            All cookies cleared!

                            Comment

                            • SmokeyTheBear
                              ►SouthOfHeaven
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 28609

                              #15
                              Originally posted by foolio
                              Ok, so lets say I made a url like this

                              whateveryouwant.com/sarettah_fucking_dog_in_ass_and_licking_horse_dick/cumshot-1.jpg

                              that would mean you did all that right?
                              Well you can take the word of the hundreds of people who have actually seen the pictures on his servers or you can assume you know what the pictures had on it..

                              I can tell you because i have seen them.. All you can tell me is you haven't . Just like you haven't seen jackson molest any little boys or o.j. simpson murder anybody
                              hatisblack at yahoo.com

                              Comment

                              • foolio
                                ICQ: 178725656
                                • Nov 2002
                                • 12366

                                #16
                                Originally posted by sarettah
                                Or it could be an accurate description of the folder content for all I know. I don't remember the 70's very well

                                lol

                                Comment

                                • foolio
                                  ICQ: 178725656
                                  • Nov 2002
                                  • 12366

                                  #17
                                  lol - forgot to post my point.... All these guys running around saying they have proof. IF they were telling the truth why would they not foward it to Lens? If they did they would get thier #1 wish and have this guy banned.... so whats holding them back? I think also these peopel are full of shit unless one of them stepsup and provides hard core proof to Lens.

                                  if he did it - show it and lets get him out. If they dont have proof they shoud STUFU.


                                  All I know is this shit is old now.

                                  Comment

                                  • sarettah
                                    see you later, I'm gone
                                    • Oct 2002
                                    • 14349

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                    Well you can take the word of the hundreds of people who have actually seen the pictures on his servers or you can assume you know what the pictures had on it..

                                    I can tell you because i have seen them.. All you can tell me is you haven't . Just like you haven't seen jackson molest any little boys or o.j. simpson murder anybody
                                    You've seen pictures like that of me ?? Oh shit. Damn, last times e something like this happened it cost me plenty. Ok, where are the pics? I want all the copies too.

                                    On a serious note. I have never accused sexed of being pedo. I think he is way way out there and has used questionable practices in the past.
                                    All cookies cleared!

                                    Comment

                                    • SmokeyTheBear
                                      ►SouthOfHeaven
                                      • Jun 2004
                                      • 28609

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by foolio
                                      lol - forgot to post my point.... All these guys running around saying they have proof. IF they were telling the truth why would they not foward it to Lens? If they did they would get thier #1 wish and have this guy banned.... so whats holding them back? I think also these peopel are full of shit unless one of them stepsup and provides hard core proof to Lens.

                                      if he did it - show it and lets get him out. If they dont have proof they shoud STUFU.


                                      All I know is this shit is old now.
                                      I emailed lensman several pictures that have since been erased, but if the above quote is correct lensman saw the nude pictures of 14 year old girls and said it was ok..

                                      Some of the other pictures previously contained hardcore pictures of apparent children engaged in sex acts..
                                      hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                      Comment

                                      • SmokeyTheBear
                                        ►SouthOfHeaven
                                        • Jun 2004
                                        • 28609

                                        #20
                                        Most of the hardcore images have been erased from the archive after repeated complaints regarding them. But the pictures posted in this thread * quote * and the other were from a well documented childrens porn ring in russia..
                                        hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                        Comment

                                        • foolio
                                          ICQ: 178725656
                                          • Nov 2002
                                          • 12366

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                          I emailed lensman several pictures that have since been erased, but if the above quote is correct lensman saw the nude pictures of 14 year old girls and said it was ok.
                                          but if the quote above is a correct quote I am taking that as Lens not seeing anything. "I haven't seen any child porn on any his stuff. I didn't see any in smokey's email."

                                          So did lens see 14-year old girls nude? Or did he not see them?

                                          You say you seen the pictures - did he say they were 14 or did they just look 14? Shit, I can show you some Asian girls that look 12 that are really like 30, lol. Hell, even little april and twanee (back in the day) tried to pull that shit. Could this have been sometihng like that? I have no idea - never saw pictures don't care to see the pictures. And in no way am I defending CP or SexEd but this ENTIRE thing is just fucking old.

                                          Comment

                                          • BradM
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Dec 2003
                                            • 3397

                                            #22
                                            I sent lens the thread that was obviously deleted that "masterblogger" posted a CP link on.

                                            He said it wasn't proof enough.

                                            Pageviews over morals.

                                            Comment

                                            • PenisFace
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Oct 2003
                                              • 3774

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by BradM
                                              I sent lens the thread that was obviously deleted that "masterblogger" posted a CP link on.

                                              He said it wasn't proof enough.

                                              Pageviews over morals.
                                              That about sums it up.
                                              Need custom blog posts or articles? Hit me up: Blog And Article Writer

                                              Yes, I can do any kind of custom orders, too!

                                              ICQ: 641204000

                                              Comment

                                              • baddog
                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                • Apr 2001
                                                • 107089

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                                                The child porn was pulled picture by picture from the archie servers as it was reported..
                                                I think maybe you need to go to ASACP and read the definition of CP

                                                Comment

                                                • Webmaster_Logic
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jul 2004
                                                  • 1886

                                                  #25
                                                  well the only way i see to get rid of this guy is everyone to start a thread and complain about him..... i will start it off..


                                                  p.s since my next post on gfy will be my last you guys/girls hold the fort down....

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Webby
                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                    • Oct 2002
                                                    • 14956

                                                    #26
                                                    foolio:

                                                    lol - forgot to post my point.... All these guys running around saying they have proof. IF they were telling the truth why would they not foward it to Lens? If they did they would get thier #1 wish and have this guy banned.... so whats holding them back? I think also these peopel are full of shit unless one of them stepsup and provides hard core proof to Lens.
                                                    I have more than enough "proof" that was started a few years back now.

                                                    The reason I'm not giving fuck all info out on this shitbag or providing *any* material to others is there is more at stake. I'm not gonna fuck up work done by others for the sake of some peace on a webmaster board which, when you think of it, means nothing.

                                                    Much as tho I'd love to post the whole fucking lot - it sure is tempting when the shitbag goes into a state of denial - I know there are more "relevant" things in line for SexEd. Folks have spent a long time over SexEd and a few others. I also still want to remain on friendly terms with the people who trusted me - so nada info outta me! :-)

                                                    Screw his crap on GFY! :-)

                                                    PS... I doubt he is still doing his CP shit - he knows stuff - and I'm sure his hard drives are spotless - at least the one's he is currently using.
                                                    XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Centurion
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Dec 2002
                                                      • 6033

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by BradM
                                                      I sent lens the thread that was obviously deleted that "masterblogger" posted a CP link on.

                                                      He said it wasn't proof enough.

                                                      Pageviews over morals.
                                                      And it has become "He doesn't NOW have cp on his site."
                                                      Can't argue with that one!

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Doctor Dre
                                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                        • Jan 2001
                                                        • 51692

                                                        #28
                                                        Ok we might not have proof but we all know he is a deranged individual and a pure troll . I don't see why he's still here
                                                        Originally posted by rayadp05
                                                        I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Centurion
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Dec 2002
                                                          • 6033

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by Doctor Dre
                                                          Ok we might not have proof but we all know he is a deranged individual and a pure troll . I don't see why he's still here
                                                          Using that criteria..you could wipe out 2/3rd of the membership!

                                                          Comment

                                                          • foolio
                                                            ICQ: 178725656
                                                            • Nov 2002
                                                            • 12366

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Centurion
                                                            Using that criteria..you could wipe out 2/3rd of the membership!
                                                            lol, I think you are underestimating here

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Webby
                                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                              • Oct 2002
                                                              • 14956

                                                              #31
                                                              foolio:

                                                              lol, I think you are underestimating here
                                                              You think??

                                                              Why would anyone think that?

                                                              The board says it all.....
                                                              XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • jonesy
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Jan 2003
                                                                • 6688

                                                                #32
                                                                i guess this intro page says it all

                                                                http://web.archive.org/web/200011090...education.com/
                                                                .
                                                                Shooting Bikini Girls

                                                                Comment

                                                                • SmokeyTheBear
                                                                  ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                                  • Jun 2004
                                                                  • 28609

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by foolio
                                                                  but if the quote above is a correct quote I am taking that as Lens not seeing anything. "I haven't seen any child porn on any his stuff. I didn't see any in smokey's email."

                                                                  So did lens see 14-year old girls nude? Or did he not see them?

                                                                  You say you seen the pictures - did he say they were 14 or did they just look 14? Shit, I can show you some Asian girls that look 12 that are really like 30, lol. Hell, even little april and twanee (back in the day) tried to pull that shit. Could this have been sometihng like that? I have no idea - never saw pictures don't care to see the pictures. And in no way am I defending CP or SexEd but this ENTIRE thing is just fucking old.
                                                                  He did indeed see the pictures , as i sent them to him via email.

                                                                  look a bit on the archive servers , theres still a few pics up, you have to dig, im not going to post them because lensman will delete them for some reason from gfy , yet he asks for people to post the proof, If it isn't proof why does he delete them , they are hotlinked straight from the servers .
                                                                  hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • evildick

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by theking


                                                                    With everyone talking about proof of this and proof of that...apparently not a single one that claims to have proof...can provide proof to the owner of this board.

                                                                    What does that say about all of you that claim to have proof? I know what your claims of proof say to me.

                                                                    Pig shit. [/B]
                                                                    You think that picture of the little girl with a bottle of vodka between her legs is OK?

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Tipsy
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Jul 2001
                                                                      • 6989

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by evildick
                                                                      You think that picture of the little girl with a bottle of vodka between her legs is OK?

                                                                      You have to remember you're talking to someone almost as unstable as sexped although fortunately without the kiddy fixation.
                                                                      Ignorance is never bliss.

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • CDSmith
                                                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                        • May 2001
                                                                        • 51460

                                                                        #36
                                                                        I looked around his site last year when this issue first came up. I say I saw some very questionable stuff going on there. Very questionable. The child-porn-like innuendo on his site was rampant, a few banners were blatant pandering to kids, including the sex connotation.

                                                                        I don't know, maybe he's changed some things since. I haven't bothered going back there.



                                                                        But I expect my word to be enough. If it isn't enough for some of you, then some of you just don't get it. I know what I saw.
                                                                        I didn't like what I saw.


                                                                        Now you can believe me or not, makes no nevermind to me. But don't go challenging my word and arguing and disagreeing with me and defending the twit. Because, out of the two of us, it is I that actually went and looked at the site and took the time to look around in order to know what I'm talking about. Some of you talking here.... didn't.

                                                                        Clear enough?
                                                                        Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

                                                                        ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

                                                                        Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
                                                                        ICQ me at: 31024634

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • theking
                                                                          Nice Kitty
                                                                          • Sep 2002
                                                                          • 21053

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by evildick
                                                                          You think that picture of the little girl with a bottle of vodka between her legs is OK?

                                                                          I do not approve of the picture...but I doubt that it meets the legal criteria of being child porn. It is unimportant what I think...it is Lensmans board.
                                                                          Last edited by theking; 09-28-2004, 04:49 AM.
                                                                          When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                          FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • theking
                                                                            Nice Kitty
                                                                            • Sep 2002
                                                                            • 21053

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by Tipsy
                                                                            You have to remember you're talking to someone almost as unstable as sexped although fortunately without the kiddy fixation.
                                                                            You saying it does not make it true...now does it? BTW... whoever you are.
                                                                            When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                            FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • JayJay
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Jun 2002
                                                                              • 3739

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by sarettah
                                                                              Now thats fucking proof right there!

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              Working...