200!
Sexeducation: Sponsor Guidelines
Collapse
X
-
Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager -
hey Woj ...Originally posted by woj
200!
everyone is going to buy your bot services - like NOT ...
moron ...Comment
-
about 75% on this board are scammers and spammers.Originally posted by theking
If true Danny boy...that would make you a scammer. I suspect that it is true.
usually the biggest trash talkers.Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hostingComment
-
And if they do ...
consider the sig of the company that would.
If you don't have NATS you don't have NUTS.
Adult.com uses NATS a program that does NOT ALLOW SHAVING!!!
oh ...oh ...whatever ...
lets pick the company that deals with a bot poster ...
ya - that's shows ethics?Comment
-
hahahOriginally posted by sexeducation
hey Woj ...
everyone is going to buy your bot services - like NOT ...
moron ...Comment
-
yes ...Originally posted by jimmyf
about 75% on this board are scammers and spammers.
usually the biggest trash talkers.
they usually only insult.
never provide information ...
just INSULT ...
However, if you don't have NATS you don't have NUTS.
Adult.com and Playboy.com subscribe to NATS an independent verification service that makes SHAVING your sales - impossible.
When considering the integrity of a supplier - which would you choose?Comment
-
NATS isn't an independent verification service, you stupid pedophile.Originally posted by sexeducation
However, if you don't have NATS you don't have NUTS.
Adult.com and Playboy.com subscribe to NATS an independent verification service that makes SHAVING your sales - impossible.
Comment
-
People don't realize when I post - I really don't give a fuck who is posting.Originally posted by Groove
I am very disappointed to see that this sick fuck has still not been banned.
It appears that the page views he generates are more important than the
ethical and legal issues associated with allowing him to post here.
Okay? k
Most times I don't even look at who is posting ...
The ethical issue is do you ban someone just because the majority of a board went on a witch hunt?
I stand by Lensman, Adult.com and Playboy.com for not bailing and allowing me the opportunity to defend myself.
That takes GUTS ... and they use NATS ...
and that is why if you are considering being a new adult webmaster ...
this is where you need to be ...
is that crystal?Comment
-
Shit... Is this silly drama about some pedo asshole still going on?
How much more shit has to be posted on this board relating to SexEd's past activities??
It is clear this guy is basically irresponsible, has published child porn on his "websites", has tried his best to contact children and communicate with them under his "righteous", tho irresponsible guise of "sex education".
His "marketing" is designed to encourage children into his sites with banner ads on websites likely to be visited by minors, and asking shit like "Mom and Dad never had intercourse like this".
If anyone ain't got a clue yet - SexEd's conduct in here is that of a typical "pedo" - ie.. the adoption of "high moral standards", constant lying and his high drama over others operating child porn sites. His guy is just playing "closet pedo" mind games.
If we need to have some images of kids giving adults blowjobs and being anally penetrated to proove the masses of previous posts over this - I've got them, together with versions of his "websites" over the past few years. They have been duped on CD's and the law have been provided with copies. It has also been confirmed by police officers who specialize in child related offenses that SexEd's "websites" are indeed (or were!) child porn. If the law can't throw this idiot in jail - there is a problem, although I understand they have good reasons to delay action.
There is NO DEFENSE for this shit - it is obscene in the true sense of the word. This guy is either mentally ill or needs locked up. I pity the fact he actually has a family.
Lens is right in the respect he "knows nothing" - however, I can soon change his mind damned quick with the shit I've got on CD's.
All that verbal spew from this guy is bullshit - it is a track record of constant lying and "avoidance". He knows damned well what was on his "websites" - it's called child pornography.Last edited by Webby; 09-27-2004, 05:13 PM.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
And I will also say ...
that while you watch the shaving posts go by ...
that while you consider how long it takes to make a decent adult website ...
that you also consider that Adult.com has NEVER bailed on SexEducation.com ...
who do you want as a supplier???
the one the helps or the one that bails based on bullshit?
They are NOT backing down and neither am I.Comment
-
so why dont you send this stuff to Lens?? Why do you still allow this guy to keep on functioning when all Lens wanted was proof. If your holding, then give it up and you'll be a hero on GFY for finally banning SexEd.Originally posted by Webby
Shit... Is this silly drama about some pedo asshole still going on?
How much more shit has to be posted on this board relating to SexEd's past activities??
It is clear this guy is basically irresponsible, has published child porn on his "websites", has tried his best to contact children and communicate with them under his "righteous", tho irresponsible guise of "sex education".
His "marketing" is designed to encourage children into his sites with banner ads on websites likely to be visited by minors, and asking shit like "Mom and Dad never had intercourse like this".
If anyone ain't got a clue yet - SexEd's conduct in here is that of a typical "pedo" - ie.. the adoption of "high moral standards", constant lying and his high drama over others operating child porn sites. His guy is just playing "closet pedo" mind games.
If we need to have some images of kids giving adults blowjobs and being anally penetrated to proove the masses of previous posts over this - I've got them, together with versions of his "websites" over the past few years. They have been duped on CD's and the law have been provided with copies. It has also been confirmed by police officers who specialize in child related offenses that SexEd's "websites" are indeed (or were!) child porn. If the law can't throw this idiot in jail - there is a problem, although I understand they have good reasons to delay action.
There is NO DEFENSE for this shit - it is obscene in the true sense of the word. This guy is either mentally ill or needs locked up. I pity the fact he actually has a family.
Lens is right in the respect he "knows nothing" - however, I can soon change his mind damned quick with the shit I've got on CD's.
All that verbal spew from this guy is bullshit - it is a track record of constant lying and "avoidance". He knows damned well what was on his "websites" - it's called child pornography.Comment
-
PEDO:
Fuck off you obnoxious slimy creepAnd I will also say ...
that while you watch the shaving posts go by ...
that while you consider how long it takes to make a decent adult website ...
that you also consider that Adult.com has NEVER bailed on SexEducation.com ...
who do you want as a supplier???
the one the helps or the one that bails based on bullshit?
They are NOT backing down and neither am I.
You know *nothing* about "decent adult websites" - your limit is child porn - till you were compelled to remove it.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Exactly ...Originally posted by TheLegacy
so why dont you send this stuff to Lens?? Why do you still allow this guy to keep on functioning when all Lens wanted was proof. If your holding, then give it up and you'll be a hero on GFY for finally banning SexEd.
there is no proof - it never happened!
So who do you want as a supplier ...
think about it ...
the one with guts to NEVER back down and come to your aid ...
or those others ... shaving ... not having the NUTS for NATS ...
you think about it ... and don't fuck around with my supplier's reputation ...Comment
-
TheLegacy:
If anyone actually wanted to know shit about SexEd - all they have to do is call .. eg.. in the US - the FBI unit that specialises in this - they know "John Beacock of Calgary" pretty well. I also understand that the police forces in five other countries know him as well - they have been in touch.so why dont you send this stuff to Lens?? Why do you still allow this guy to keep on functioning when all Lens wanted was proof. If your holding, then give it up and you'll be a hero on GFY for finally banning SexEd.
I ain't gonna send some CD's of child porn to Lens - I doubt anyone would appreciate getting that crap in their mail since it is probably an offense to do this anyway. You don't exactly *need* to see some child being butt-fucked to realize SexEd *was* into child porn - the net archives speak for themselves.
I ain't running GFY - this is up to Lens to make a balanced decision on what goes on in boards where he has control. The fact that this PEDO has published child porn links here already (in his state of "moral superiority"), would be enough to ban the little shit if it was within my control. I don't need to see his child porn sites - which still remain partly archived on the net.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
of course they "know" me ...Originally posted by Webby
TheLegacy:
If anyone actually wanted to know shit about SexEd - all they have to do is call .. eg.. in the US - the FBI unit that specialises in this - they know "John Beacock of Calgary" pretty well. I also understand that the police forces in five other countries know him as well - they have been in touch.
I ain't gonna send some CD's of child porn to Lens - I doubt anyone would appreciate getting that crap in their mail since it is probably an offense to do this anyway. You don't exactly *need* to see some child being butt-fucked to realize SexEd *was* into child porn - the net archives speak for themselves.
I ain't running GFY - this is up to Lens to make a balanced decision on what goes on in boards where he has control. The fact that this PEDO has published child porn links here already (in his state of "moral superiority"), would be enough to ban the little shit if it was within my control. I don't need to see his child porn sites - which still remain partly archived on the net.
look how prolific I am on the world's busiest adult webmaster board you fucking moron ..
However, I say to all law enforcement agencies everywhere on the planet ... that you have permission to post any personal correspondence, emal, phone PERSONAL conversations, chat or other regarding rape, child pornography, child pornography distribution, child molestation whether SUSPECTED, INTERVIEWED, CONVICTED BUT DROPPED and CONVICTED WITHOUT LEGAL RECOURSE.
John E. Beacock
You owe me an apology Webby!
You behaived like a GFY sheep.
Now - be a man and apologize.Comment
-
PEDO:
Why do you constantly deny anything to do with child porn??Exactly ...
there is no proof - it never happened!
You KNOW very well what was on your websites - a combination of child porn images, rambling "writings" about the "protection of children", "vaginal orgasms", Dad communications and a load of ripped off images which were the property of others and which you had no rights to use.
Don't you know that you had images of oral sex with children within a few pages of these massive "protection of children" statements you had on your supposed "websites"?
You are a liar with pedo tendencies and clearly lack any balanced judgement on - almost any web-related matters - hence the verbal bile in your posts - example above.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
There are no copies of stuff that does not exist.Originally posted by Groove
Webby, you should send copies to Lens
Be the HERO oh Webby ...
send the copies to the POLICE ... not Lensman ...
the fucking Police ...
send your proof to the fucking POLICE ...
don't be a coward like Centurian who posted " I need help - what should I do" ...
What you do is - WITHOUT EXCEPTION - send your proof to the fucking police - is that crystal to you??
Do you require contact numbers?Comment
-
PEDO:
PEDO... Your "content" is already with the police. What is the point of your post? Did you not know this already??There are no copies of stuff that does not exist.
Be the HERO oh Webby ...
send the copies to the POLICE ... not Lensman ...
the fucking Police ...
send your proof to the fucking POLICE ...
don't be a coward like Centurian who posted " I need help - what should I do" ...
What you do is - WITHOUT EXCEPTION - send your proof to the fucking police - is that crystal to you??
Do you require contact numbers?
Contact numbers? You mean for you? Hell.. no!! Others have better methods of contacting you - like real addresses. You think people are really that stupid they rely on some maildrop?
Last response to you - you ain't worth pissing on. A poor specimen of a human being who will, if there is any justice, be judged well.
XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Bring it on bitch.Originally posted by Webby
PEDO:
PEDO... Your "content" is already with the police. What is the point of your post? Did you not know this already??
Contact numbers? You mean for you? Hell.. no!! Others have better methods of contacting you - like real addresses. You think people are really that stupid they rely on some maildrop?
Last response to you - you ain't worth pissing on. A poor specimen of a human being who will, if there is any justice, be judged well.
The law has never contacted me - EVER!!!!
So what will it take another two years by the most influential in the "adult" industry ...
you are a fucking liar and a coward ...
your true colors were shown tonightComment
-
It´s not crystal to me - In fact I have no idea what that means ?Originally posted by sexeducation
Well that and the truth ...
Both Adult.com and Playboy.com do NOT permit the posting of aroused genitals or reproductive fluids on their directly accessed domain names or their affiliates.
NOW - I am going to help even the playing field.
Is that fucking crystal?Comment
-
Damn, damn, damn.... I did it again, sorry - I didn´t mean to open this thread - It just, kind of, happend when I hit the reply button.Originally posted by sexeducation
There is only certain people who could open this thread and you guys are not one of them.
Boobmaster - get well.
I really mean that.
Sorry man, I really mean it....
(Guess i´m one of the certain people who can open a thread after sexed terminates it)Comment
-
Right onOriginally posted by MT_Butterfly
Witch hunt? Uh, I don't make the news, I just report it.
Reality...I'm not in day care or elementary school, I have no fear of you killing my bunny if I make public the information on your website and I will not go hide in a corner because your deluded enough to believe you can "own" me.
Reality...You can't "own" anyone, ban anyone, terminate any threads nor prevent people from posting in your's or anybody else's threads. This delusion of power that you *believe* you have over other people and their actions is very much only in your head.
Now how's that for reality?
Comment
-
I'm going to Fort McMurray tomorrow ...
[fingers crossed] 12 hour days at 22.50 per hour ...kewl
I could use that kind of bucks now that all my domains are renewing ..Comment
-
Claude:
That's what usually happens when a direct question is asked... like...Ooops, did I just open it again. I think so. Sorry, please forgive me !!!!
Have you ever had images of children engaged in sexual acts on your websites?
Have you "communicated" with children with regard to their "sex education" without the consent of their parents?
If he does actually answer - the reply will be no. But there is a more honest answer
"It" is a pathetic liar.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
It's definately in lala land...Quote by PEDO:
I'm going to Fort McMurray tomorrow ...
[fingers crossed] 12 hour days at 22.50 per hour ...kewl
I could use that kind of bucks now that all my domains are renewing ..
A state of denial as usual...XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
I answer every question every time ...
Originally posted by Webby
Claude:
That's what usually happens when a direct question is asked... like...
Have you ever had images of children engaged in sexual acts on your websites?
no ...
sample of what occured in movies still rentable from the local video store but NONE of where there was partner contact ..
i don't teach sex education ... I discuss it ...Have you "communicated" with children with regard to their "sex education" without the consent of their parents?
I have never knowingly talked to a minor without their parents consent.
you are the liar ...If he does actually answer - the reply will be no. But there is a more honest answer
"It" is a pathetic liar.
you said you had proof ...
I say send it to the police ...
YOU ARE A FUCKING LIAR ...
WHERE IS YOUR PROOF !!!Comment
-
dude your preaching to the choir, but I think that if you call or email Lens and ask permission to send the stuff, or at least give him the telephone numbers of the authorities with proper identification then perhaps Lens will have something to work with.Originally posted by Webby
TheLegacy:
If anyone actually wanted to know shit about SexEd - all they have to do is call .. eg.. in the US - the FBI unit that specialises in this - they know "John Beacock of Calgary" pretty well. I also understand that the police forces in five other countries know him as well - they have been in touch.
I ain't gonna send some CD's of child porn to Lens - I doubt anyone would appreciate getting that crap in their mail since it is probably an offense to do this anyway. You don't exactly *need* to see some child being butt-fucked to realize SexEd *was* into child porn - the net archives speak for themselves.
I ain't running GFY - this is up to Lens to make a balanced decision on what goes on in boards where he has control. The fact that this PEDO has published child porn links here already (in his state of "moral superiority"), would be enough to ban the little shit if it was within my control. I don't need to see his child porn sites - which still remain partly archived on the net.
If SexEd has posted links, then please find the links / threads that he posted. Talk with Lens and dont assume he wont accept something by mail if its serious.Comment
-
I'm signing off ...
I need to get packed for a road trip.
Alberta ... you know oil ...
you know Fort McMurray the worlds richest oil sands [fingers crossed] ...
will find out where tomorrow ...Comment
-
Lens has been through this though ...for almost 18 months.Originally posted by TheLegacy
dude your preaching to the choir, but I think that if you call or email Lens and ask permission to send the stuff, or at least give him the telephone numbers of the authorities with proper identification then perhaps Lens will have something to work with.
If SexEd has posted links, then please find the links / threads that he posted. Talk with Lens and dont assume he wont accept something by mail if its serious.
Let me build my website.
A website of real scientific sexual equality.
"All the books are saying something different.
Now it's my turn."
[email protected]Comment
-
A little more skilled then that baby doll.Originally posted by Kimmykim
For the last time, Lensman does not run Playboy.com you fool.
And as for your packing, I'd venture a guess you're just working the split shift at the gas station today.
You see the views/posts I get.
If a gas station attendent can do that to this board ... whoaa Adult.com is realllllly in trouble ?
; )Comment
-
TheLegacy:
Na.. I ain't gonna waste any time on this PEDO because of his chatboard shit. Others are more than capable of dealing with him in their own time.dude your preaching to the choir, but I think that if you call or email Lens and ask permission to send the stuff, or at least give him the telephone numbers of the authorities with proper identification then perhaps Lens will have something to work with.
If SexEd has posted links, then please find the links / threads that he posted. Talk with Lens and dont assume he wont accept something by mail if its serious.
You obviously missed his "child porn" link posting - if Lens ain't seen them and all the rest of the shit on this board about SexEd - there is a problem. It is clear as day.
Frankly, I'd be more concerned about the ramblings of a child pornographer on this board than the little shit himself. The last thing the adult biz needs to be marinated in is fucking pedos spewing their denial garbage and moral pontifications on webmaster boards. It's all bullshit.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Ironically.. this is kinda amusing in a pathetic way.Quote from "Dad":
A little more skilled then that baby doll.
You see the views/posts I get.
If a gas station attendent can do that to this board ... whoaa Adult.com is realllllly in trouble ?
; )
Shows a touch of lala land.... some arrogance.... and some other stuff - leave ya to "imagine" :-)
How the fuck this person has not been chucked off *any* board - hell knows. There is rarely... or never been.. one sane post.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Originally posted by Webby
TheLegacy:
Na.. I ain't gonna waste any time on this PEDO because of his chatboard shit. Others are more than capable of dealing with him in their own time.
You obviously missed his "child porn" link posting - if Lens ain't seen them and all the rest of the shit on this board about SexEd - there is a problem. It is clear as day.
Frankly, I'd be more concerned about the ramblings of a child pornographer on this board than the little shit himself. The last thing the adult biz needs to be marinated in is fucking pedos spewing their denial garbage and moral pontifications on webmaster boards. It's all bullshit.
Not you though ...
Lensman shut your fucking mouth.
Didn't he?Comment
-
Lensman
"You're playing with fire with these kind of treads, prove he's a pedo, or prepare to be banned."
in the thread
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...adid=363172&s=Comment
-
I say ...
Don't be a coward send your proof DIRECTLY to the police.
Lensman and myself are bored with this now.Comment
-
So what does it taste like?Originally posted by Webby
More ramblings for an arrogant fantasy-world pedo?
Silly little hahahaha...
Lensman's sperm?
Webby - I know you know - share the knowledge with the world.Comment




Comment