50 sponsor guidelines 
-
-
"Fair use" is something that I learned right here on GFY. However, something even more valuable which was also learned here was RISK MANAGEMENT.Originally posted by evildick
Translation:
"Come on in children, just make sure you get your checkbook out before you check out the smut I stole and the child porn pics I reposted from usenet."
In other words, it really doesn't matter what I personally believe regarding "fair use" of graphics as I am going to ONLY USE 2257 COMPLIANT GRAPHICS!!!Comment
-
Currently??Originally posted by sexeducation
Understood.
There is NO content currently on SexEducation.com "targeted" to those under the age of 21.
It is a venue of ADULT ONLY intercourse.
All graphics will be 2257 compliant.
Thank you.
gfynicky @ gmail.comComment
-
When you become ...Originally posted by Nicky
Currently??
well you won't ...
but assuming you could be a Master Blogger ...
a single word can make people reply ...
currently there is not ...
however one day ...
someone will buy me out ...
create a general audience area, a mature area and an adult only area ...
the domain spans both adult and mainstream ...Comment
-
A case in point ...
At one time my domain was capable of the most advanced content filtering possible ...
graphics turned on or off
advertising turned on or off
ability to move content from one "area" to another .
and more ...
I called them "Parental Content Controls" and traffic dropped immediately ... I changed just one word to "Adult Content Controls" and traffic resumed ..
a single word can have an impact on a website or post ...Comment
-
That's just fucking sad he's not banned from here yet ... he's the weirdest fucker I've seen with boobmasterOriginally posted by NoCarrier
Even if 1% of what people say about sexeducation is true, I would never let him promote my program.
That guy is too fucking weird. It's obvious he has serious mental stability problems.
Sexeducation and porn don't go very well together.
If you were looking for porn, would you type that domain name? Not really.Originally posted by rayadp05Comment
-
Originally posted by sexeducation
Understood.
There is NO content currently on SexEducation.com "targeted" to those under the age of 21.
It is a venue of ADULT ONLY intercourse.
All graphics will be 2257 compliant.
Thank you.
Yeah right ... didn't you target all traffic b4 lens shown you that ? didn't your pedo banner was shown in mainstream sites?Originally posted by rayadp05Comment
-
I have never had a "pedo" banner ...Originally posted by Doctor Dre
Yeah right ... didn't you target all traffic b4 lens shown you that ? didn't your pedo banner was shown in mainstream sites?
this was answered above - please read the thread before you mouth off.
I had DIFFERENT banners on various websites ...
some on general audience
while
simultaneously others on adult only exchanges ...
When you grow up ...
you will understand that some sexual topics are general audience, some are mature and some are restricted ...
And that really is the essence of a Parents job which is deciding WHEN those types of information need to be taught to their offspring ...
Some 18 year old can not handle - even mature content ..
other 14 year olds can handle more ...
however it is the PARENTS decision not this community's NOT my community's decision ...
Currently - SexEducation.com HAS ONLY ADULT CONTENT ..
uses ONLY ADULT 2257 compliant graphics ...
Currently ...Comment
-
Originally posted by evildick
Here's an archive of a page that he used to have on his site where he was basically saying that minors could look at the porn on his site if they paid him $100. Pretty crazy stuff.
http://web.archive.org/web/200010171...t_content.html
Why anyone would risk letting this lunatic into their program is beyond me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheSmutPeddlerDOTcom
I just went to your homepage ...
and on your homepage ...
without a warning CLICK HERE TO ENTER 18+ ...
children can view inappropriate material without warning !!!
And this board is now WELL AWARE of the people that slander me are YOUR TYPE OF PERSON which does that.
Almost always ...
The Adult.com community is getting sick and tired of your bullshit and fucking lies.
The Adult.com community respects the rights of children to reasonable access to the information age - and Lensman does NOT ALLOW content in unprotected areas that disrespect the rights of minors.
Look at the the Adult.com homepage and judge for yourself!!Comment
-
Hmm, I can think of at least 5 major TGPs right now that don't have warning pages. Having a warning page and having pictures of CP is two different things. You fucking tool.Originally posted by sexeducation
I just went to your homepage ...
and on your homepage ...
without a warning CLICK HERE TO ENTER 18+ ...
children can view inappropriate material without warning !!!
And this board is now WELL AWARE of the people that slander me are YOUR TYPE OF PERSON which does that.
Almost always ...
The Adult.com community is getting sick and tired of your bullshit and fucking lies.
The Adult.com community respects the rights of children to reasonable access to the information age - and Lensman does NOT ALLOW content in unprotected areas that disrespect the rights of minors.
Look at the the Adult.com homepage and judge for yourself!!Comment
-
I've never had pictures of CP on my website Archive.org proves it!Originally posted by TheSmutPeddlerDOTcom
Hmm, I can think of at least 5 major TGPs right now that don't have warning pages. Having a warning page and having pictures of CP is two different things. You fucking tool.
Using ... photoshop ... or any other graphic program ... censor the identity of any suspect graphic HEAVILY .... and post your proof...Comment
-
HAHAHAHA, yeah, that's what I'll do right now, I'll waste my valuable time looking through your site for CP, then I will upload it to my server and post it as proof. You really are as stupid as you act on this board aren't you? You're more of a fucking idiot than a lot of the characters on here, and that is really saying a lot about your idiocy. I am done responding to your posts, you are a nobody, will always be a nobody, and all in all are just a dumbass.Originally posted by sexeducation
I've never had pictures of CP on my website Archive.org proves it!
Using ... photoshop ... or any other graphic program ... censor the identity of any suspect graphic HEAVILY .... and post your proof...Comment
-
hmm... sounds like sexed got you there..Originally posted by TheSmutPeddlerDOTcom
HAHAHAHA, yeah, that's what I'll do right now, I'll waste my valuable time looking through your site for CP, then I will upload it to my server and post it as proof. You really are as stupid as you act on this board aren't you? You're more of a fucking idiot than a lot of the characters on here, and that is really saying a lot about your idiocy. I am done responding to your posts, you are a nobody, will always be a nobody, and all in all are just a dumbass.
Comment
-
Thank you ...Originally posted by mrthumbs
hmm... sounds like sexed got you there..
that's called OWNED.
I haven't done anything wrong - I haven't already apologized for.
If you've been in this dynamic business for 10 years ... come on ...what happened then - is no longer acceptable now.
It's maturing...
as it should ...
Porn is going mainstream - get used to it.Comment
-
Therefore, if you are a teenager visiting this website WITHOUT DIRECT ADULT SUPERVISION THIS WEBSITE IS NOT FREE. The cost per page retrieved is $100 USD dollars each.
holy molyComment
-
she looks about 13.Originally posted by MattO
Here is one of his banners that he was using on the horse forums to advertise his site:
Comment
-
No I would say 15...Originally posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday
she looks about 13.
It's a Corel Draw clip art graphic.
In the long term strategy of SexEducation.com ... in hindsight that was a mistake. I apologize. I was trying to "compete" but the playing field was not level ...
Whitehouse.com showing inappropriate content, etc etc ...
Russia going crazy with more extreme graphics on their homepages - the US webmaster trying to compete with that ...the legislation behind ... those were the old days.
That was I while ago ...
I apologize to this community.Comment
-
However, I recieved NO COMPLAINTS WITH 3 MILLION BANNER EXPOSURES ...
that is factualComment
-
When I saw that verbage, I said the same thing. The more I see the worse it gets.Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
Therefore, if you are a teenager visiting this website WITHOUT DIRECT ADULT SUPERVISION THIS WEBSITE IS NOT FREE. The cost per page retrieved is $100 USD dollars each.
holy moly
Most here show porn in some way that can get to the eyes of minors. Start with all the TGPs and FHG of sponsors. There is a difference in that and showing or implying that underage models are involved.
IMHO charging Teens $100 crossed the line.
This whole thing scares me. Not what we need in the industry. I didn't think the site meets the qualifications of educational. What little there was on the site was NOT what I would call totally factual.Comment
-
Big deal, I've had that many exposures with no conversions!Originally posted by sexeducation
However, I recieved NO COMPLAINTS WITH 3 MILLION BANNER EXPOSURES ...
that is factualComment
-
Wanna bet he also doesn't have permission to use her on that banner?Originally posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday
she looks about 13.
Comment
-
SexEducation.Com enough said...
SexEd starts in like 5th grade....
Curious kids taking the class may type that into their browser to see if there is any research they can do on it..I'm here for the violence!Comment
-
This is fucked up, does anyone know what other sponsors let this site send them traffic?
Because he doesn't have cp posted TODAY he's ok? lolComment
-
brb ...
gone to get a six pack ...
then I will reply to the above
It's all good ...
life that is ... as it goes by.Comment
-
I've NEVER had CP ...Originally posted by Rich
This is fucked up, does anyone know what other sponsors let this site send them traffic?
Because he doesn't have cp posted TODAY he's ok? lol
that's why I had mainstream sponsors ...
ding dong the lights are on but no-one is home ...Comment
-
Poor pedo, didn't they teach you about sarcasm in school? (not the ones you lurk outside of now, the one you went to school in.)Originally posted by sexeducation
Thank you ...
that's called OWNED.
Comment
-
we have the same feeling on that..no need to bet. I am wondering if he has 2257 docs on her..and if he did.. how scary would that be to the parents...eek!Originally posted by Peaches
Wanna bet he also doesn't have permission to use her on that banner?
Not cool to put a under 18 girls head on a banner that is obviously geared towards adults.. oh well.. the guy can spin a mean story and thinks he does nothing wrong.. How do you try to make the insane see the light..lolComment
-
LOL the same argument about sexeducation in about 5 active threads!
Legit mailing and optin databases -
Adult,Casino&Pharmacy.
ICQ: 272-745-001 - EMail:[email protected]
Adult payments allowed! on your site or between webmasters! www.YowCow.comComment
-
JUST FIVE ???Originally posted by SlutFinder
LOL the same argument about sexeducation in about 5 active threads!
What the hell is happening ...
OMG ...time to up the drama ...
AMP AMP calling AMP ...
any suggestions?Comment
-
it was before I was aware of 2257 ...Originally posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday
we have the same feeling on that..no need to bet. I am wondering if he has 2257 docs on her..and if he did.. how scary would that be to the parents...eek!
Not cool to put a under 18 girls head on a banner that is obviously geared towards adults.. oh well.. the guy can spin a mean story and thinks he does nothing wrong.. How do you try to make the insane see the light..lol
and probably 3 years before 2257 was even law ...
nextComment
-
Yeesssssss ...NeedleDick ...Originally posted by evildick
Poor pedo, didn't they teach you about sarcasm in school? (not the ones you lurk outside of now, the one you went to school in.)
Irony is the one most people don't get.
Been caught personally by the Onion on an abortion article.
Before I knew what the Onion was about.Comment
-
Originally posted by sexeducation
I've NEVER had CP ...
that's why I had mainstream sponsors ...
ding dong the lights are on but no-one is home ...
you dumbass, archive.org shows a fucking directory on your domain called child_pornography with fucking images in it? WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT YOU SICK FUCK?
http://web.archive.org/web/*sr_16nr_...ducation.com/*Comment
-
Legendary Lars removed him from his program, Fastsize and a bunch others I know deactivated his accounts... Lens should surf his site himself and be able to come to a conclusion pretty quickly.Comment
-
Wrong ...Originally posted by media
SexEducation.Com enough said...
SexEd starts in like 5th grade....
Curious kids taking the class may type that into their browser to see if there is any research they can do on it..
a "sex education" starts the day the child is born ...
mostly by parental example ...Comment
-
Isn't charging teens $100 to access adult content without their parents permission like a bar that lets minors come in the back way if they slip the bouncer some $$$?.Comment
-
You forgot about being banned by Overture for being openly against groups of people ... when I banned all of Russia (.RU) ...and they didn't I didn't even have a single .RU member ...roflmaoOriginally posted by LadyMischief
Legendary Lars removed him from his program, Fastsize and a bunch others I know deactivated his accounts... Lens should surf his site himself and be able to come to a conclusion pretty quickly.
And for being banned by Google for posting the graphic that took three clicks to see of a sponsored Google advertiser ...
I posted a graphic from Bondage.com on my website and my advertsing account got cancelled for inappropriate material?
Her lips were sewn together - for real. Fuck that. I'll take take that hit anytime.
Yet - they were a PAID ADVERTISER of Google ....?????
This is the MasterBlogger ...
all of you ...simultaneously ...lets go
have it ...Comment
-
It was a warning not to access my website in a time when AVS's were being destroyed...Originally posted by mardigras
Isn't charging teens $100 to access adult content without their parents permission like a bar that lets minors come in the back way if they slip the bouncer some $$$?
I wanted to make sure I had a "biometric" warning and entrance to my website.
The current entrance still has one.
A very uncommon manner in which to enter that a "robot" could not easily do.
I think ...
I will be changing it soon so bots that have adapted can't get in.Comment
-
This whole room at once ...
is not fast enough for the MasterBlogger ...
keep going ...
That's because it is the truth.
I need no time for an answer.Comment
-
Next or apologize !
Thank you Lensman, Adult.com and Playboy.com for allowing me the opportunity to defend my reputation.
Thank you.Comment
-
Originally posted by MattO
you dumbass, archive.org shows a fucking directory on your domain called child_pornography with fucking images in it? WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT YOU SICK FUCK?
http://web.archive.org/web/*sr_16nr_...ducation.com/*Comment
-
You'd think that being a Canadian citizen, you'd be able to put together a coherent sentence. Obviously not.
Originally posted by sexeducation
You forgot about being banned by Overture for being openly against groups of people ... when I banned all of Russia (.RU) ...and they didn't I didn't even have a single .RU member ...roflmao
And for being banned by Google for posting the graphic that took three clicks to see of a sponsored Google advertiser ...
I posted a graphic from Bondage.com on my website and my advertsing account got cancelled for inappropriate material?
Her lips were sewn together - for real. Fuck that. I'll take take that hit anytime.
Yet - they were a PAID ADVERTISER of Google ....?????
This is the MasterBlogger ...
all of you ...simultaneously ...lets go
have it ...
Bad Girl Bucks - 50% Revshare through CCBill.
Promote BrandyDDD, Pixie's Pillows, Action Allie and more!
Phoenix Forum Pics | Webmaster Access Montreal pics
email: psyko514(a)gmail.com | icq: 214-702-014Comment
-
[IMG]http://web.archive.org/web/20021130100309/sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/tiscali_1.jpg
[/IMG]
If this censored graphic of a Russian advertisement is considered child pornography then I request the deletion of my Adult.com accounts and the termination of Archive.org as there is NO EXCUSE for posting child pornography.
BOTH MUST OCCUR THOUGH ...
Both Archives.org and SexEducation.com must be deleted.Comment
-
OK, you start by deleting your site and leaving here and never coming back, and I promise I will attempt to get that stuff taken off of archive.org.Originally posted by sexeducation
[IMG]http://web.archive.org/web/20021130100309/sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/tiscali_1.jpg
[/IMG]
If this censored graphic of a Russian advertisement is considered child pornography then I request the deletion of my Adult.com accounts and the termination of Archive.org as there is NO EXCUSE for posting child pornography.
BOTH MUST OCCUR THOUGH ...
Both Archives.org and SexEducation.com must be deleted.Comment
-
-
If this censored graphic of a Russian advertisement is considered child pornography then I request the deletion of my Adult.com accounts and the termination of Archive.org as there is NO EXCUSE for posting child pornography.
BOTH MUST OCCUR THOUGH ...
Both Archives.org and SexEducation.com must be terminated.
However, if you feel that in some situations that CP must be discussed ... if you believe in free speech ...
Then you must answer the question - where?
I believe on the world's busiest adult webmaster board .. that under certain situations - Adult.com MUST allow the discussion of this most controversial subject ...
otherwise ... we can not teach those entering the biz about it ...
On my website - I would NOT attempt that type of discussion.
On SexEducation.com ALL GRAPHICS WILL BE 2257 compliant ...
Here though ...
I have questions about that?
Not the big mouths ...
but does the Adult.com community agree with that?
= = = = =
here is the final post ...
I wasn't done writing the "article" before the 5 min time limit was up ...Comment
-
Sometimes in hind sight people wish they had taken steps to protect their investments while they still had value.
Just a thought Lens... I've never been in favor of banning pretty much anyone over the years. But this guy drags your board down to a level that's just not nice.
He's obviously delusional, including delusions of grandeur. And while I realize that a little controversy is good for page views, he's really not.Comment
-
Jesus, why did you have to hotlink it?Comment
-
And that didn't tell your dumb delusional ass that you were cultivating some sort of illicit community based around something that probably shouldn't exist?Originally posted by sexeducation
[B]
I called them "Parental Content Controls" and traffic dropped immediately ... I changed just one word to "Adult Content Controls" and traffic resumed ../B]
If not, then you are more than just a delusional idiot, you would seem to be predatory in nature.Comment
-
Child pornography is not discussed on webmaster message boards. It's discussed by ASACP, US Customs, the FBI and other like minded organizations.Originally posted by sexeducation
However, if you feel that in some situations that CP must be discussed ... if you believe in free speech ...
Then you must answer the question - where?
I believe on the world's busiest adult webmaster board .. that under certain situations - Adult.com MUST allow the discussion of this most controversial subject ...
You need to see a doctor pronto.Comment
![[Brian]]( "[Brian]")
Comment