This is the first pic in a b/g set....Everyone loves it...just wondering if to the surfer porn can be to pretty (generally speaking)
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
We shot that set about a year ago....thanks for the yumms and ahhhhs but am being serious.....kinda a biz thread here.....can porn be to pretty?
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Originally posted by fulcrumstudio We shot that set about a year ago....thanks for the yumms and ahhhhs but am being serious.....kinda a biz thread here.....can porn be to pretty?
What are you talking about? It's a good pic, professional, hot..what's the problem? Quality is good..
There is definitely a market for it. Its the type of people who feel ok looking at erotic art or photography but are not into hardcore porn, or atleast don't admit to it.
Yeah this set is definately hardcore...it goes all the way to facial. I guess you hit it on the head do you think the surfers are now swinging back to the pretty stuff or is it still all gonzo/amatuer
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Originally posted by fulcrumstudio Yeah this set is definately hardcore...it goes all the way to facial. I guess you hit it on the head do you think the surfers are now swinging back to the pretty stuff or is it still all gonzo/amatuer
there will always be a market for pro quality hardcore like that.
great stuff, good luck
I don't think there's any such thing as "too beautiful". I get really annoyed when some people get ugly models and try to pass them off as good looking. It happens way too often, probably about 50% of the models out there shouldn't be models. They're just some skank the webmaster picked up off the street and agreed to suck a cock for $100 or however much was thrust at her.
Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training
"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
I'd really like to see how the hardcore pics you have of this fashion, could you post them? Havent seen it much, would love to... might be something good to promote.
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.
That is very nice and will appeal to the higher class of porn viewers. There are many that will watch anything but this stands out and frankly i'm quite impressed...
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Originally posted by fulcrumstudio This is the first pic in a b/g set....Everyone loves it...just wondering if to the surfer porn can be to pretty (generally speaking)
If I were a surfer and I saw this on a gallery or site, I'd whip out the CC
Originally posted by fulcrumstudio This is the first pic in a b/g set....Everyone loves it...just wondering if to the surfer porn can be to pretty (generally speaking)
I LOVE hardcore porn with high production values
And I believe there's a substantial, but largely untapped market for it.
i do fine art nude photography... as well as other forms, and it still amazes me that every now and again, fine art photos end up on pr0n sites... not that anything is really wrong w/ it... just kinda funny from a photographers point of view
The only photoshop on that image is facial re-touch. That was straight out of the camera - an RZ67 with an Imacon 11mp back.
I lit the scene with all hotlights. For lighting I used a 4k Mole Solar Spot as the main light with a grid spot (from above down through the silk). I used LTM 400 peppers for the light on the drapes.
I diffused it overhead with a 14' x 14' mole 1/2 stop china silk.
Thats the reason for the smooth wrapping light, why it looks so warm, and why Angel's skin's natural oil shines.
That's old skool even if I am a young punk....lol
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
The super polished look is just another niche. And I do think it is a smaller audience.
(Although I do think women consumer's appreciate the effort more)
Porn is one of those places where the loins rule, not the head's asthetic taste. I know I've had to swallow a lot of pride and use ugly designs and "less beautiful" images because they convert better.
That being said, you do the polished niche WELL. So, yes, too polished for some, just right for your (smaller) target audience.
Originally posted by LukieD There is definitely a market for it. Its the type of people who feel ok looking at erotic art or photography but are not into hardcore porn, or atleast don't admit to it.
definitly... not everybody are sickos :P
Originally posted by rayadp05
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Comment