Congress Drafts Law Banning Video Voyeur Photography

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KRL
    Entrepreneur
    • Oct 2002
    • 31429

    #1

    Congress Drafts Law Banning Video Voyeur Photography

    WASHINGTON -- Calling video voyeurism the new frontier of stalking, the House on Tuesday approved legislation to make it a crime to secretly photograph or videotape people, often for lascivious purposes.

    Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said the issue of surreptitious videotaping has become "a huge privacy concern" with the miniaturization of technology and the proliferation of cell phone cameras.

    People have used these devices for purposes like secretly taking pictures beneath women's skirts in such places as school locker rooms, department store dressing rooms and private homes.

    Rep. Michael Oxley, R-Ohio, a former FBI agent who has promoted the legislation, said there are were many Web sites devoted to such pictures, where they "can be instantly posted on the Internet for millions to view."

    Secretly photographing people in a compromising position is against the law in some states, but there is no federal law. Oxley said the legislation could serve as a model for states that have not enacted anti-voyeurism laws.

    The bill would make it a crime to videotape or photograph the naked or underwear-covered private parts of a person without consent when the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
    If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
    from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!

    *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
    Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains
  • xclusive
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Apr 2004
    • 35218

    #2
    Fuck there goes my favorite hobby...But seriously this is going to screw a lot of web sites...

    I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


    Comment

    • Wiggles
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • May 2004
      • 14423

      #3
      hasn't it always been illegal? they'll just fake it now anyway.
      no sig

      Comment

      • Joesho
        want to get in shape
        • Jan 2003
        • 12329

        #4
        Key wording....

        without a reasonabloe expectation of privacy....

        I would think a good lawyer can keep the party girl stuff in the mix...

        I am sure they are targeting the real stalketrs, and perves out there with this law.....( those are the dangerous ones)
        Got any domains to sell?
        I proudly host all my stuff at www.rackco.com

        Comment

        • polish_aristocrat
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jul 2002
          • 40377

          #5
          Originally posted by KRL
          WASHINGTON -- Calling video voyeurism the new frontier of stalking, the House on Tuesday approved legislation to make it a crime to secretly photograph or videotape people, often for lascivious purposes.

          this sounds good, would anyone want his girlfriend or daughter to be secretely photographed on a beach and then put on TheHun
          I don't use ICQ anymore.

          Comment

          • TheLegacy
            SEO RobertWarrenSEO.com
            • Apr 2003
            • 18244

            #6
            Originally posted by Wiggles
            hasn't it always been illegal? they'll just fake it now anyway.
            truly compliant sites that show amateur or hidden cam's have to be 2257 compliant and has to have model release forms before making any money off of images.

            so the answer is yes, it is fake. What this bill proposes is to stop stalkers and sick fuckers from videotaping or snapping pictures of under your wife's or daughters skirt while walking or going up an esculator.

            RobertWarrenSEO.com
            Telegram: @TheLegacy54

            Comment

            • stocktrader23
              Let's do some business.
              • Jan 2003
              • 18781

              #7
              Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
              this sounds good, would anyone want his girlfriend or daughter to be secretely photographed on a beach and then put on TheHun
              Don't care. Oh no, a bikini gallery on teh huns! Our lives is ruined!


              Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

              "I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."

              Comment

              • KRL
                Entrepreneur
                • Oct 2002
                • 31429

                #8
                Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
                this sounds good, would anyone want his girlfriend or daughter to be secretely photographed on a beach and then put on TheHun

                If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
                from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!

                *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
                Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

                Comment

                • Manowar
                  jellyfish  
                  • Dec 2003
                  • 71528

                  #9
                  Originally posted by stocktrader23
                  Don't care. Oh no, a bikini gallery on teh huns! Our lives is ruined!

                  Comment

                  • Matt 26z
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Apr 2002
                    • 18481

                    #10
                    Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
                    this sounds good, would anyone want his girlfriend or daughter to be secretely photographed on a beach and then put on TheHun
                    This law wouldn't cover that. There's nothing private about the beach. You are in a public place.

                    Comment

                    • Khun
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 1239

                      #11
                      Wont affect 90% of the sites out there who are presently doing this.
                      Sig is on vacation... (I wish I could vacation as long as my sig has...)

                      Comment

                      Working...