So whats left of the 2257 horror?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mrthumbs
    salad tossing sig guy
    • Apr 2002
    • 11702

    #1

    So whats left of the 2257 horror?

    It was the end of the world and look at us now.

    Anyone suffering?
  • Fletch XXX
    GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
    • Jan 2002
    • 60840

    #2
    anyone suffering
    just people trying to sell 2257 software.


    Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

    Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

    Comment

    • VeriSexy
      Join The Royal Family
      • Apr 2002
      • 25463

      #3
      Originally posted by Fletch XXX
      just people trying to sell 2257 software.


      LMAO
      Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
      Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos
      .
      With TOP RATIO Sites like


      ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com |
      TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com


      Comment

      • 2257-Ben
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2005
        • 633

        #4
        The judge still has not made his ruling as to whether the DOJ can start enforcing the new regs, particularly with regard to secondary producers. The stipulation agreement between the FSC and the DOJ has been extended 30 days or until the judge makes his ruling. There has been one individual brought up on 2257 violations charges as a result of an obscenity case, where the plain view evidence rules revealed they didn't have 2257 records. (We're going to see more of this, even if the inspections don't move forward for some reason)

        According to Samuel Kaplan, attorney for the DOJ, the judge will be ruling pretty soon, he says before the end of the month (Sept 2005). He's pretty confident that the 'clarifications' that he's brought before the court will allow inspections and enforcement to commence, and quite frankly, the DOJ really has a hard-on for starting to enforce this. They're not going to go away on this one.
        2257-Ben
        www.2257ware.com
        The BEST, most compliant 2257 record-keeping software available. Period.

        Comment

        • 2257-Ben
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2005
          • 633

          #5
          BTW... I have also had contact from several US Senators regarding the 2257 regs and there seems to be broad support in the US Senate to ensure that if the DOJ isn't allowed to enforce the current regulations, they will enact some other legislation to ensure it gets enforced.
          2257-Ben
          www.2257ware.com
          The BEST, most compliant 2257 record-keeping software available. Period.

          Comment

          • YankBro
            Registered User
            • Feb 2005
            • 81

            #6
            In addition, Schaffer is charged with one count of operating three pornographic Internet websites without including required statements describing the location of identification and other records for the performers portrayed in the websites, as is required by federal law.

            http://www.ccv.org/CCV_Perspective-20050830.htm


            So, who here thinks the 2257 laws can't take a bite out of their ass? This guy is facing a bigger legal bill than any of you gangsta's could ever afford.

            Comment

            • 3piece chicken Dinner
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2005
              • 1065

              #7
              Originally posted by mrthumbs
              It was the end of the world and look at us now.

              Anyone suffering?


              Yeah it seems like it was a pretty good thing people stepped up and mounted an opposistion to this. 2257 is not an issue that is in the forefront because steps were taken to fight against the unjust and unreasonable parts of the perposed regulations.

              But the situation isn't over by a long shot, it's just most on this board have no attention span, and are easily distracted by the next person screaming SHINEY KEYS LOOK HERE SHINEY KEYS.
              "We are told to let our light shine, and if it does, we won't need to tell anybody it does. Lighthouses don't fire cannons to call attention to their shining- they just shine."

              Comment

              • Fletch XXX
                GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                • Jan 2002
                • 60840

                #8
                Originally posted by YankBro
                In addition, Schaffer is charged with one count of operating three pornographic Internet websites without including required statements describing the location of identification and other records for the performers portrayed in the websites, as is required by federal law.

                http://www.ccv.org/CCV_Perspective-20050830.htm


                So, who here thinks the 2257 laws can't take a bite out of their ass? This guy is facing a bigger legal bill than any of you gangsta's could ever afford.
                you cant compare people who run sites to spammers.

                if you spam little kids, you should go to jail.

                Also, if you plead guilty, for it, you cant use this as argument against people who run sites legit.

                A fourth individual ? Andrew Ellifson, 31, of Scottsdale, Arizona ? pleaded guilty on Feb. 13, 2005 to one spamming count under the CAN-SPAM Act and one count of criminal conspiracy.
                Last edited by Fletch XXX; 09-08-2005, 05:30 AM.

                Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                Comment

                • Dalai lama
                  Strength and Honor
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 16540

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Fletch XXX
                  you cant compare people who run sites to spammers.

                  if you spam little kids, you should go to jail.

                  Also, if you plead guilty, for it, you cant use this as argument against people who run sites legit. This guy was a spamming fuck, who cares?
                  Spammers may die

                  A program you can trust.
                  Gallerybooster Run multiply TGPs of 1 script

                  Comment

                  • YankBro
                    Registered User
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 81

                    #10
                    If you run a legit site you never had a problem with 2257 in the first place. Fact is that a great amount of traffic to legit sites is created by non-2257 compliant resellers and spammers. The feds are not stupid...It won't hurt them a bit to throw federal charges at a legit site that is being promoted by uncompliant resellers. You spend a couple years and a few hundred k fighting the charges only to lose even if you win.

                    Comment

                    • Fletch XXX
                      GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 60840

                      #11
                      Originally posted by YankBro
                      If you run a legit site you never had a problem with 2257 in the first place.
                      Exactly. So you using a spammer busted for FRAUD has NOTHING to do with 2257.

                      Specifically, three individuals ? Jennifer R. Clason, 32, formerly of Tempe, Arizona; Jeffrey A. Kilbride, 39, of Venice, California; and James R. Schaffer, 39, of Paradise Valley, Arizona ? were indicted on two counts of fraud and related activity in connection with electronic mail under the CCAN-SPAM Act of 2003 and one count of criminal conspiracy.
                      You clearly stated:

                      So, who here thinks the 2257 laws can't take a bite out of their ass? This guy is facing a bigger legal bill than any of you gangsta's could ever afford.
                      Fraud and spamming has nothing to do with 2257 or running a site and keeping model recordds.

                      Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                      Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                      Comment

                      • 2257-Ben
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jun 2005
                        • 633

                        #12
                        Sorry to disagree with you here Fletch...

                        If you're busted for fraud and spamming and the DOJ investigators find as a result of their investigation that you do not have 2257 records, they can (and apparently will) charge you with 2257 record keeping violations, especially if they think they may have a weak case for the fraud or spamming. It's gonna be much harder for people to weasel out of the record keeping requirements charges and even if they don't get convictions on the fraud or spamming charges for some reason, they'll have a pretty solid case for non-compliance to 2257 regulations.
                        2257-Ben
                        www.2257ware.com
                        The BEST, most compliant 2257 record-keeping software available. Period.

                        Comment

                        • YankBro
                          Registered User
                          • Feb 2005
                          • 81

                          #13
                          The fact is that the feds are willing to throw in 2257 charges that in the past would have just been spam & fraud violations. Consider also they offer a deal to the spammer to testify against the 'legit' site that he has been promoting with non-compliant content. Even if he's totally lying his ass off that you knew you still have to spend at least a hundred k in attorney fees to fight charges off effectively at a federal level. 2257 is still a real threat.

                          There are a 1000 reasons the cops can decide to look into an adult webmasters business affairs. It just takes one nosey investigator with a hard-on to turn your life and business to shit. Your jealous girlfriend could turn you in saying you had child porn (even if you didn't), the UPS guy whose daughter goes to school with your kids may notice the volume of adult materials being shipped in and out of your home business, some one may break into your business while you're gone and the cops enter before you do, etc....just little, completely unavoidable things like this can start off years of a very well-publicised hell. Now go and fight a federal 2257 charge (even if it's bullshit) while you're at it. Fun, Fun.

                          Comment

                          Working...