Originally Posted by dig420

No, there is only one side to the story. I read a lot of these a long time ago, and mostly what they do is claim they're 'debunking' Moore's film, but when you read the actual text of what they say all they do is cry about the 'cheap shots' Moore takes. Such as the Wolfowitz comb-licking thing. You see a lot of lines like '(Moore) Defends the factual accuracy of the segment, which no one has ever disputed... but it was in bad taste'.

Face it: Bush is an incompetent spoiled rich boy from Connecticut who failed at everything he ever tried to do except misleading ignorant conservatives. Apparently it's easier to become President by pandering to the lowest common denominators in our society than it is to run a successful business.