The masterblogger asked me for my help in setting up a poll for him, so I kindly said yes...
Should the pedo be banned?
Should the pedo be banned?
-
124Yes0%112No0%12 -
Now remember pedo, if the gfy community votes you off the island you must leave gfy forever! -
Comment
-
You know it was so long ago that I forget why everyone calls him that.
What did he do again?Comment
-
Fuck yes...... he at one time posted his site that had cp on it... we all know the history... I don't give a fuck if it's not there anymore. He is not right in the fucking head.......icq 1904905Comment
-
CD Smith's prediction:
Yes (ban the pedo):
397 (99.24%)
No (Let the pedo stay):
3 (0.66%)
PA-LACE YOUR BETSSS!!Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!
ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634Comment
-
You needed to be around at the time to undertsand how difficult it was to make him see why posting CP and marketing a site to pedos AND kids was wrong. It was very, very disturbing.Originally posted by iceicebaby
Fuck yes...... he at one time posted his site that had cp on it... we all know the history... I don't give a fuck if it's not there anymore. He is not right in the fucking head.......
Is there any reason this will be any more effective than any of the other 100 polls asking if he should be banned?Ignorance is never bliss.
Comment
-
he should be banned!!!!Comment
-
I don't know who you are talking about ...]Originally posted by Tipsy
You needed to be around at the time to undertsand how difficult it was to make him see why posting CP and marketing a site to pedos AND kids was wrong. It was very, very disturbing.
Is there any reason this will be any more effective than any of the other 100 polls asking if he should be banned?
I'm not a pedo ..
but I can relate to this post in the learning process of "risk management" as I have often said learned right here on GFY ..
I voted YES - we should ban all "pedo's".Comment
-
ooops ... I just voted for myself.Comment
-
I was around at the time and thats why I say he isn't right in the head.... he doesn't understand right from wrong.Originally posted by Tipsy
You needed to be around at the time to undertsand how difficult it was to make him see why posting CP and marketing a site to pedos AND kids was wrong. It was very, very disturbing.
Is there any reason this will be any more effective than any of the other 100 polls asking if he should be banned?icq 1904905Comment
-
Originally posted by sexeducation
I voted YES - we should ban all "pedo's".
I just voted for myself.
If that's not a confession, I don't know what is.Comment
-
Originally posted by MattO
If that's not a confession, I don't know what is.I don't use ICQ anymore.Comment
-
but there's no proof right icy?Originally posted by iceicebaby
I was around at the time and thats why I say he isn't right in the head.... he doesn't understand right from wrong.
just like I have asked soooo sooo often to post a SINGLE LINK to the proof that vaginal orgasm exists ...
what you get is - insults ...
what ...
but NEVER credible proof ...
I believe that GFY is one of this worlds MOST UNIQUE communities where webmasters like myself DO NOT LINK general audience websites to an ADULT ONLY FORUM ... and if they do THAT IS WRONG ...
so post your ADULT ONLY PROOF ...Comment
-
haha, i think we all know the answer to your questionComment
-
hahaha, we all the know who the 1 vote came fromComment
-
I voted ban all pedo's as I didn't immediately see the (sexeducation) text.Originally posted by JaceXXX
hahaha, we all the know who the 1 vote came from
I did NOT vote no - I voted yes.Comment
-
I am so fucking SICK of these 'ban the PEDO polls.' Not because I sympathize with the PEDO, but because they are a fucking daily occurance on GFY. Shit, people. If you don't want to read the guy's threads or posts, PUT THE FUCKER ON IGNORE.Comment
-
yep ...Originally posted by boobmaster
I am so fucking SICK of these 'ban the PEDO polls.' Not because I sympathize with the PEDO, but because they are a fucking daily occurance on GFY. Shit, people. If you don't want to read the guy's threads or posts, PUT THE FUCKER ON IGNORE.
now to bump the real reason I post on GFY ...
I want to know if Adult.com and Playboy.com are going to allow me the opportunity to "push buttons" - yes controversial shit - while I rebuild my website into a profitable adventure.Comment
-
Actually it's already 4 votes.Originally posted by JaceXXX
hahaha, we all the know who the 1 vote came fromI don't use ICQ anymore.Comment
-
*nod* - it was more for the many that weren't. Disturbing thing is I think it's not just as simple as knowing right from wrong. The guy has shown countless times that although he often can't differentiate right from wrong, he also has a genuine fascination with children and sex and more importantly sex involving children. However he does genuinely fail to see it and as you say, fails to see how it's wrong.Originally posted by iceicebaby
I was around at the time and thats why I say he isn't right in the head.... he doesn't understand right from wrong.
That disturbs me hugely. Left to his own devices the guy really does seem damaged enough to cause a lot of harm to kids and not just mentally. Through his 'articles' and 'advice' on his site using the pedo 'dad' alias he can do, and probably has done, a lot of damage.
The one good thing about all the crap on GFY I suppose is that at least he hasn't been able to go about this undetected and for the abuse, be it written or otherwise, to get any worse. I'd imagine the guy is being watched carefully (and least I would hope this is true). This being the biggest porn board around it's almost certainly monitored and combined with non-internet complaints about him the guy must be under scrutiny. Were it not for GFY the scrutiny may not have been so intense.
That said this really is no place for someone like that. The industry has enough troubles caused for the most part by itself without individuals like him adding to them. It remains a huge shame that the line between profit and social conscience really has vanished here for the most part.
Sadly this poll is unlikely to change anything either. Even a banning is pretty useless unless it's also applied to other names as and when he registers them, which no longer seems to happen here.Last edited by Tipsy; 09-16-2004, 01:46 PM.Ignorance is never bliss.
Comment
-
When the shit started going down months ago... I wen't to your site and saw the fucking CP on there. You were trying to defend it saying it was only one picture, blah, blah, blah. We all told you it didn't matter if it was one pic or not... it still wasn't right....Originally posted by sexeducation
but there's no proof right icy?
just like I have asked soooo sooo often to post a SINGLE LINK to the proof that vaginal orgasm exists ...
what you get is - insults ...
what ...
but NEVER credible proof ...
I believe that GFY is one of this worlds MOST UNIQUE communities where webmasters like myself DO NOT LINK general audience websites to an ADULT ONLY FORUM ... and if they do THAT IS WRONG ...
so post your ADULT ONLY PROOF ...
Seek help.... your idea of reality is fucked up man.icq 1904905Comment
-
And you needed 4500 posts for it?Originally posted by sexeducation
yep ...
now to bump the real reason I post on GFY ...
I want to know if Adult.com and Playboy.com are going to allow me the opportunity to "push buttons" - yes controversial shit - while I rebuild my website into a profitable adventure.I don't use ICQ anymore.Comment
-
YOUR WEBSITE WILL NEVER BE A PROFITABLE VENTURE. GIVE UP AND GO KILL YOURSELF.Originally posted by sexeducation
yep ...
now to bump the real reason I post on GFY ...
I want to know if Adult.com and Playboy.com are going to allow me the opportunity to "push buttons" - yes controversial shit - while I rebuild my website into a profitable adventure.Comment
-
Yes of course ...Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
And you needed 4500 posts for it?
answer yes or no ...
Do you agree ...that there ...should be ...
"No aroused genitals or reproductive fluids on any directly accessed domain name" Dad@.
yes or no ??Comment
-
Whether someone should be banned and whether someone will be banned are 2 entirely different matters. I don't think petitions will do anything to change one to the other.
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!
Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training
"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."Comment
-
Yes.Comment
-
I think my kak_azn ban petition was succesfull. :D:D:DOriginally posted by CET
Whether someone should be banned and whether someone will be banned are 2 entirely different matters. I don't think petitions will do anything to change one to the other.
I don't use ICQ anymore.Comment
-
Originally posted by boobmaster
I am so fucking SICK of these 'ban the PEDO polls.' Not because I sympathize with the PEDO, but because they are a fucking daily occurance on GFY. Shit, people. If you don't want to read the guy's threads or posts, PUT THE FUCKER ON IGNORE.
He's on ignore here. if people wouldn't reply he would go away.
Comment
-
see you aroundwant to buy this spot for cheap? it is of course for sale. long term deals are always the best bet. brand0n/ at/ a o l dot commies.Comment
-
Your countries TLD may no longer be allowed in Canada and the United States if you continue to avoid the question...Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
I think my kak_azn ban petition was succesfull. :D:D:D
Yes or NO ...
Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name?
Answer the question coward ...Comment
-
Originally posted by sexeducation
Your countries TLD may no longer be allowed in Canada and the United States if you continue to avoid the question...
Yes or NO ...
Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name?
Answer the question coward ...
Another post from you that made so LITTLE sense it gives me a headache.
Moron!
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
You requested anonymity ... I gave it to you and your firm.Originally posted by BradM
Another post from you that made so LITTLE sense it gives me a headache.
Moron!
However, you chose to enter this thread...
Answer the question ...
"Should aroused genital or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name" - yes or no?Comment
-
too bad he wont stay awayOriginally posted by polish_aristocrat
I think my kak_azn ban petition was succesfull. :D:D:D
even if sexed gets banned he will still come back too
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-Darth VaderComment
-
Comment
-
As usual just insults from MasterBlogger wannabe's ...Originally posted by NoCarrier
answer the question ...
"Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name?"
Answer the question ...
I say the Unites States Webmaster have begun VOLUNTARILY to comply according to western COMMUNITY STANDARDS and we should BANN ALL THOSE EU countries that do not comply to the reasonable access to the information age that minors deserve.
CYA - rogue nations.
I've won a ten year battle.Comment
-
Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!
ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634Comment
-
Originally posted by CDSmith
Print it and market it, I swear to God, I'll wear it.
Comment
-
Gets some guts little boy ...Originally posted by CDSmith
it's only GFY ..
"Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be show on any directly accessed domain name" - yes or no?
So let's wake up the answer is no - that current legislation and cc changes (regardless of my rants) have made this a reality.
Why the FUCK are we allowing Russian and EU communities to do what we don't accept - ban all their TLD's.Comment
-
Now this is a VERY good post and everything you've said is true. I truly believe that one class of individual's who can't be rehab'ed or helped is "pedophile's". There is a very good reason that the reoffense rate is so high for them....and that is their psychological make up. They see nothing wrong with harming children and in their own sick, twisted minds, it is "OK" to act on their urges and harm kid's. They are able to justify their actions in their minds and that is all that matter's to them.Originally posted by Tipsy
*nod* - it was more for the many that weren't. Disturbing thing is I think it's not just as simple as knowing right from wrong. The guy has shown countless times that although he often can't differentiate right from wrong, he also has a genuine fascination with children and sex and more importantly sex involving children. However he does genuinely fail to see it and as you say, fails to see how it's wrong.
That disturbs me hugely. Left to his own devices the guy really does seem damaged enough to cause a lot of harm to kids and not just mentally. Through his 'articles' and 'advice' on his site using the pedo 'dad' alias he can do, and probably has done, a lot of damage.
The one good thing about all the crap on GFY I suppose is that at least he hasn't been able to go about this undetected and for the abuse, be it written or otherwise, to get any worse. I'd imagine the guy is being watched carefully (and least I would hope this is true). This being the biggest porn board around it's almost certainly monitored and combined with non-internet complaints about him the guy must be under scrutiny. Were it not for GFY the scrutiny may not have been so intense.
That said this really is no place for someone like that. The industry has enough troubles caused for the most part by itself without individuals like him adding to them. It remains a huge shame that the line between profit and social conscience really has vanished here for the most part.
Sadly this poll is unlikely to change anything either. Even a banning is pretty useless unless it's also applied to other names as and when he registers them, which no longer seems to happen here.
Luckily, this board is monitored and reports are being made. All a person can hope for is that justice will prevail and those offenders will face the legal consequences of their actions.No sig for you!Comment
-
Originally posted by NoCarrier
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tipsy
*nod* - it was more for the many that weren't. Disturbing thing is I think it's not just as simple as knowing right from wrong. The guy has shown countless times that although he often can't differentiate right from wrong, he also has a genuine fascination with children and sex and more importantly sex involving children. However he does genuinely fail to see it and as you say, fails to see how it's wrong.
That disturbs me hugely. Left to his own devices the guy really does seem damaged enough to cause a lot of harm to kids and not just mentally. Through his 'articles' and 'advice' on his site using the pedo 'dad' alias he can do, and probably has done, a lot of damage.
The one good thing about all the crap on GFY I suppose is that at least he hasn't been able to go about this undetected and for the abuse, be it written or otherwise, to get any worse. I'd imagine the guy is being watched carefully (and least I would hope this is true). This being the biggest porn board around it's almost certainly monitored and combined with non-internet complaints about him the guy must be under scrutiny. Were it not for GFY the scrutiny may not have been so intense.
That said this really is no place for someone like that. The industry has enough troubles caused for the most part by itself without individuals like him adding to them. It remains a huge shame that the line between profit and social conscience really has vanished here for the most part.
Sadly this poll is unlikely to change anything either. Even a banning is pretty useless unless it's also applied to other names as and when he registers them, which no longer seems to happen here.
Outright ban his IP, and all his nicks, this industry doesn't need this kind of webmaster making all of our lives worse than it already is.Comment
-
I change my defence of you Juicy ...Originally posted by juicylinks
they are right on anything important you only post "smilies" ...
Get off the fucking fence and join an actual discussion for once.Comment
-
Say why ... you coward ...Originally posted by erehwon
Outright ban his IP, and all his nicks, this industry doesn't need this kind of webmaster making all of our lives worse than it already is.
OMG am I tired of the sig whores on this board that only insult ...
state you reasons ...
make a logical arguement ..Comment
-
Hmm, it looks like the pedo has 6 nicksComment
-
Or 5 other pedos who voted for him that do not want to lose access to the private CP area on sexeducation.com.Originally posted by MattO
Hmm, it looks like the pedo has 6 nicks
Last edited by NoCarrier; 09-16-2004, 02:24 PM.
Comment
-
No MattO ...
just six people with the guts ...
maybe which do not agree with me - but can at least see my point of reference and are not GFY sheep ...
whoever you are ... thank youComment
-
Originally posted by sexeducation
As usual just insults from MasterBlogger wannabe's ...
answer the question ...
"Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name?"
Answer the question ...
Gee, I thought this campaign was "officially over"? Well, according to this, you said it was...........
(stand by)
"Our old campaign ("No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name") is now officially over........."
And here is the url, just in case you've forgotten about it...
http://livehomepage.blogspot.com/
So, have you officially reactivated this campaign, or is this just another way to take the spotlight off the real issues? Or is this just another lie? Or is this how MasterBlogger's do shit?No sig for you!Comment
Comment