Webby ??
Why are you guys talking about me ?
I am a nobody ...
Yea.. true - you are a nobody.
That's why "nobody" has bothered about you so far - but even when "nobodies" run child porn sites - "somebody" eventually gets round to dealing with "nobodies" like you...
Originally posted by brizzad as much as i dont like you.. im curious to hear your whole rags to riches story, so post it
I'm not rich ...
there is no story ...
except I WILL NOT POST ANYTHING EXCEPT WHAT HAS BEEN PROVEN TO ME OR HAS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF THE SCIENTIFIC SEXUAL TRUTH ...
That's why "nobody" has bothered about you so far - but even when "nobodies" run child porn sites - "somebody" eventually gets round to dealing with "nobodies" like you...
That's the good news I had today
yes - true.
I am a nobody - just a Father.
And the most recognized handle on the worlds busiest adult webmaster board. ; )
Your only luck so far is not getting arrested. But don't worry. We are working on it. I talked to some people.. Expect some news in the next couple of days.
"And the most recognized handle on the worlds busiest adult webmaster board. "
BTW.. Why do you have a sig about 2257 - a law that does not have any meaning in your country and never stopped you violating it when you ran hosting from a US server with child porn??
Originally posted by NoCarrier Your only luck so far is not getting arrested. But don't worry. We are working on it. I talked to some people.. Expect some news in the next couple of days.
Oh fuck NoCarrier ...
do be a LM groupie ...
and in the next couple days - will you apologize?
if this doesn't come true?
Originally posted by Webby These delusions are getting to you...
"And the most recognized handle on the worlds busiest adult webmaster board. "
BTW.. Why do you have a sig about 2257 - a law that does not have any meaning in your country and never stopped you violating it when you ran hosting from a US server with child porn??
Na.. don't bother replying...
Don't ask a question if you don't want the answer.
I purposely host my server in the United States because it has the worlds toughest laws regarding CP and the protection of adult models (OLD 2257). Just not in agreement with newest 2257 changes where the private information of the models need to be posted and where noone on the world's busiest adult webmaster board can answer ...
...if my server is physically located in the United States, and I personally ONLY have graphics supplied by Adult.com and Playboy.com (3 graphics) physically located on that server - Do I need to receive the original sources documents from Adult.com and Playboy.com regarding those models - or can I not just link to their 2257 website statements?
I have more then enough skills to move my domains to any country I choose.
Originally posted by WarChild And yet the complexity of the search feature continues to elude you. Fascinating.
Yep post a link ...
OR answer the question ...
why do I need 2257 original documentation and why would I make public the models information on a website that for over 10 years I have defended 100% anonymity with ...
like I am really lost - teach me ....
you know I will not back down on the fact that SexEducation.com MUST MUST remain 100% anonymous in a world where women can be stoned to death for showing their ankles.
Originally posted by sexeducation Yep post a link ...
OR answer the question ...
why do I need 2257 original documentation and why would I make public the models information on a website that for over 10 years I have defended 100% anonymity with ...
like I am really lost - teach me ....
you know I will not back down on the fact that SexEducation.com MUST MUST remain 100% anonymous in a world where women can be stoned to death for showing their ankles.
If I post a link to let you search, will you forever bow to me as the master searcher?
As for your 2257 question, feel free to go hire a lawyer and figure it out. I might be willing to post a search link but there's no chance I'm going to do your research for you.
Originally posted by WarChild If I post a link to let you search, will you forever bow to me as the master searcher?
As for your 2257 question, feel free to go hire a lawyer and figure it out. I might be willing to post a search link but there's no chance I'm going to do your research for you.
Yes - I will forever bow to you as the master searcher.
Originally posted by sexeducation Yes - I will forever bow to you as the master searcher.
How about do me one better. If I give you the search URL, so you can see all the posts you've posted in .. You stop posting for the day. You can come back tomorrow, but give us the day off. Deal?
Originally posted by Webby It's the concern about the "women showing their ankles" that bothers me.
I know anonimity matters when Pedo is dealing in child porn...
The enormous "good", righteousness and concern for the people of this world is oozing outta every pore of this little pedo shitbag...
but some call that crass hypocracy - reckon they are right
Additonally his site reaks of a disturbed mind. He writes about and for children at the same time using graphic sexual descriptions.
You'll notice the "DAD@..." bit .. Dad, familiar of Father. Now you'll notice he isn't using "A Dad" or "A Father". The familiar use is a subtle way of trying to establish trust with children. You would never call yourself "Dad" amongst a group of adults. You would amongst children.
There may be no cold, hard evidence against this guy. I don't know enough about him. The little I do know gives me chills though.
Additonally his site reaks of a disturbed mind. He writes about and for children at the same time using graphic sexual descriptions.
You'll notice the "DAD@..." bit .. Dad, familiar of Father. Now you'll notice he isn't using "A Dad" or "A Father". The familiar use is a subtle way of trying to establish trust with children. You would never call yourself "Dad" amongst a group of adults. You would amongst children.
There may be no cold, hard evidence against this guy. I don't know enough about him. The little I do know gives me chills though.
He is disturbed. There is loads of "evidence" about "John" - his "sites" have been recorded and contained oral sex stuff with kids etc. Won't say any more here, but rest assured, he was known about almost two years ago :-)
Some crap to do with him was mixed up in other stuff in real life, and was far more serious shit than "just child porn", but that seems cleared now and opens the way to "deal" with this.
Originally posted by WarChild How about do me one better. If I give you the search URL, so you can see all the posts you've posted in .. You stop posting for the day. You can come back tomorrow, but give us the day off. Deal?
Yes ...
if the link for the search function you provide to past GFY posts works ...
I will give you 24 hours effective immediately ...
Comment