Originally posted by sexeducation NP ...
I will post a public appology if you can post ONE SINGLE LINK to it's scientific proof.
I've been asking for over 5 years now ...
and not a single adult webmaster has ever posted a single link to the proof that vaginal orgasm exists.
next ...
Have you ever fucked ? and gave pleasure to your parthner ?
Originally posted by rayadp05
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Originally posted by sexeducation I've have never been even suspected of being a "pedo".
Can you stop being a GFY Sheep or a "sig whore"?
It must be one of the two - right?
next
Hrmm at least 90 % of the people here suspect you of beeing a pedo ...
Originally posted by rayadp05
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Originally posted by sexeducation It's only the "sig whores" that post anything negative about me now...
Anybody who happens to think you're a Pedo is not automatically a sig whore. No matter how much you'd like it to be true.
And because they're showing they are really showing their true colors - I no longer have to worry about my rep.
Oh really? I've never seen a single person speak on your behalf. Will somebody now come out and say you have a good rep? Open your eyes. You have a terrible rep.
A sig whore doesn't have to have a sig ... ding dong ...the lights are one but noone is home.
Just his handle.
What the FUCK are you talking about? You know what a signature is, right? You know what the word "whore" means, right? If I'm not selling anything in my signature at all, how can I be a signature whore? Seriously. I'd love to have this explained.
Try me ...
Is there a TLD that needs to be shut down?
Perhaps ".TO" that CP exporting country?
What do you think of the Masters and Johnson tests that confirmed the g spot and vaginal orgasm? Do you not believe in it because you've never been able to bring your wife to a vaginal orgasm?
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..
Originally posted by WarChild Anybody who happens to think you're a Pedo is not automatically a sig whore. No matter how much you'd like it to be true.
no ...
I said "sig whores" or "GFY sheep" ...
Lensmans bring back the GFY sheep banner ...It's the best banner of all time ....
Oh really? I've never seen a single person speak on your behalf. Will somebody now come out and say you have a good rep? Open your eyes. You have a terrible rep.
I don't think so ...
a little to early for that ...
five years from now maybe ...
It's still very profitable to show "aroused genitals and reproductive fluids" on a directly accessed domain name.
CC companies are catching up ... legislation is catching up ...
but I piss off many on this board by stating exactly what I have learned ..
What the FUCK are you talking about? You know what a signature is, right? You know what the word "whore" means, right? If I'm not selling anything in my signature at all, how can I be a signature whore? Seriously. I'd love to have this explained.
Sig whores are truly out for branding of their "handle" on a particular board.
The sig changes - the handle if they are branding it as a sig whore does not. follow?
Yeah get .ru shutdown. You can't shut down anything. You're a Masterpedo, nothing else.
.RU would be a tough one ... and you are right probably not that one as it is Russia ... but I could cause some serious political pressure.
On the other countries purposely allowing CP exportation for the imported dollars ...fuck u ...
Originally posted by lazycash What do you think of the Masters and Johnson tests that confirmed the g spot and vaginal orgasm? Do you not believe in it because you've never been able to bring your wife to a vaginal orgasm?
Master and Johnson has never confirmed the "vaginal orgasm" provide a link.
No-one can provide their wife a "vaginal orgasm" ...
if the posts don't continue to fast - I will provide a link to where Masters and Johnson actually says the opposite of what you are "fake" posting they are claiming ...
Originally posted by lazycash What do you think of the Masters and Johnson tests that confirmed the g spot and vaginal orgasm? Do you not believe in it because you've never been able to bring your wife to a vaginal orgasm?
"In 1981, The Hite Report revealed that 26% of the three thousand women who participated in the study experienced orgasm regularly during vaginal intercourse, when there was no accompanying manual stimulation of their clitoris. While this study is nearly twenty years old, I have not seen any evidence that would indicate this number has changed drastically during that time period. The study also found that: 19% of the participating women rarely experienced orgasm during intercourse, 16% did so if there was manual stimulation of their clitoris at the same time, and 24% did not experience orgasm during intercourse at any time. In addition, 12% of the women had never experienced orgasm under any condition, and 3% had never engaged in intercourse. That means roughly eight out of every ten women did not experience orgasm as the result of vaginal stimulation alone. "
The Hite report was commissioned by Masters and Johnson???
unsure
Originally posted by sexeducation no ...
I said "sig whores" or "GFY sheep" ...
Lensmans bring back the GFY sheep banner ...It's the best banner of all time ....
I post what I want about whatever topic I want. I don't follow anybody. If you want to just toss out stupid terms randomly to hope one will stick: Knock it off Newb.
I don't think so ...
a little to early for that ...
five years from now maybe ...
It's still very profitable to show "aroused genitals and reproductive fluids" on a directly accessed domain name.
CC companies are catching up ... legislation is catching up ...
but I piss off many on this board by stating exactly what I have learned ..
Everyone of my domains has aroused genitals and reporudtive fluids on a directly accessed domain name. Come get me Pedo. Shut me down. Get my sponsors to throw me out. Send the police!
Sig whores are truly out for branding of their "handle" on a particular board.
The sig changes - the handle if they are branding it as a sig whore does not. follow?
If I were interested in branding a handle, I'd have mustered more energy than 1600 posts over 2 years. Please.
My signature hasn't changed. It was empty in 2002 and it's empty now. How am I sig whoring?
.RU would be a tough one ... and you are right probably not that one as it is Russia ... but I could cause some serious political pressure.
On the other countries purposely allowing CP exportation for the imported dollars ...fuck u ...
I could initiate the "dominoe affect".
You can't cause any serious political pressure. You can't cause any domino effect. You can't affect anything. Wake up.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by WarChild I post what I want about whatever topic I want. I don't follow anybody. If you want to just toss out stupid terms randomly to hope one will stick: Knock it off Newb.
just 4000 posts ...
I bectha your search function still works for GFY right?
I break board records everywhere I go.
newbie.
Everyone of my domains has aroused genitals and reporudtive fluids on a directly accessed domain name. Come get me Pedo. Shut me down. Get my sponsors to throw me out. Send the police!
I will not report you.
Nor will I harass you.
The 100% annonymity of SexEducation.com is more important.
But - I will warn you as a result - like Lensman says - there is probably only one way to keep your ass out of jail.
[looking for that link again]
If I were interested in branding a handle, I'd have mustered more energy than 1600 posts over 2 years. Please.
My signature hasn't changed. It was empty in 2002 and it's empty now. How am I sig whoring?
yep - when you act like other GFY sheep ...
yep
You can't cause any serious political pressure. You can't cause any domino effect. You can't affect anything. Wake up. [/B]
I'm doing it now.
Or do you not think that the police watch this board?
"No aroused genitals or reproductive fluids on any directly accessed domain name."
Originally posted by sexeducation "In 1981, The Hite Report revealed that 26% of the three thousand women who participated in the study experienced orgasm regularly during vaginal intercourse, when there was no accompanying manual stimulation of their clitoris. While this study is nearly twenty years old, I have not seen any evidence that would indicate this number has changed drastically during that time period. The study also found that: 19% of the participating women rarely experienced orgasm during intercourse, 16% did so if there was manual stimulation of their clitoris at the same time, and 24% did not experience orgasm during intercourse at any time. In addition, 12% of the women had never experienced orgasm under any condition, and 3% had never engaged in intercourse. That means roughly eight out of every ten women did not experience orgasm as the result of vaginal stimulation alone. "
The Hite report was commissioned by Masters and Johnson???
unsure
next
Nope, the Hite report is completely independent of Masters and Johnson, also read the Hite report again as well as what you just posted and tell me where it discounts the notion of the vaginal orgasm.
The Hite Report revealed that 26% of the three thousand women who participated in the study experienced orgasm regularly during vaginal intercourse, when there was no accompanying manual stimulation of their clitoris.
Did you even read it? There was no accompanying stimulation of their clitoris yet 26% of them experience orgasm.
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..
Originally posted by lazycash Nope, the Hite report is completely independent of Masters and Johnson, also read the Hite report again as well as what you just posted and tell me where it discounts the notion of the vaginal orgasm.
The Hite Report revealed that 26% of the three thousand women who participated in the study experienced orgasm regularly during vaginal intercourse, when there was no accompanying manual stimulation of their clitoris.
Did you even read it? There was no accompanying stimulation of their clitoris yet 26% of them experience orgasm.
Very good ...
a good blogger always post ammunition for the "enemy" to make another post.
You're right - I disagree with the report - and wish to ignite intercouse about it.
I feel - that the root of the report is wrong.
I feel that women have been TOLD what they should have and therefore made it up - because they should be having "vaginal orgasms" when in fact it is not true.
The clitoris-glans of both genders are homologous.
Originally posted by sexeducation Pinned eh ? again eh?
So where did Headless hide?
Pinned? What are you talking about? You don't make any sense. You clearly have delusions of grandeur. I won't be able to make you see the light. If I continue to argue with you I only perpetuate the problem. I don't want to be a part of your fantasy anymore. Don't mistake that for you having somehow proved a point. You haven't. You can't.
What does Headless have to do with anything? I don't speak for him. He doesn't speak for me.
Originally posted by WarChild Pinned? What are you talking about? You don't make any sense. You clearly have delusions of grandeur. I won't be able to make you see the light. If I continue to argue with you I only perpetuate the problem. I don't want to be a part of your fantasy anymore. Don't mistake that for you having somehow proved a point. You haven't. You can't.
What does Headless have to do with anything? I don't speak for him. He doesn't speak for me.
My "Headless" post was to "Headless" ...
I can hold more then one conversation at the same time.
a good blogger always post ammunition for the "enemy" to make another post.
You're right - I disagree with the report - and wish to ignite intercouse about it.
I feel - that the root of the report is wrong.
I feel that women have been TOLD what they should have and therefore made it up - because they should be having "vaginal orgasms" when in fact it is not true.
The clitoris-glans of both genders are homologous.
Post a
Lol, so you claim that the vaginal orgasm is a myth, yet you post proof to the contrary and only refute it when I show you that the report backs up the validity of the vaginal orgasm. This is hilarious, I could post dozens of reports backing up the vaginal orgasm, yet you posted one of the best for me already, lol. Go buy a clue and learn to interpret the data before you. Fact, the women were told nothing before the report and they had no preconcieved notions about the test, wake up and admit the proof before you.
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..
Originally posted by lazycash Lol, so you claim that the vaginal orgasm is a myth, yet you post proof to the contrary and only refute it when I show you that the report backs up the validity of the vaginal orgasm. This is hilarious, I could post dozens of reports backing up the vaginal orgasm, yet you posted one of the best for me already, lol. Go buy a clue and learn to interpret the data before you. Fact, the women were told nothing before the report and they had no preconcieved notions about the test, wake up and admit the proof before you.
Then post dozens ...
but you can't and will make up some reason why you can't.
I posted a flawed report that best supported your side to ignite chat about it.
Originally posted by sexeducation Go search if for yourself.
Vaginal orgasm is a lie.
There is no scientific evidence to support it.
POST A LINK.
ps: oh - I own "vaginal orgasm is a lie .com"...
does that piss you off too?
aaaah ...
Where is that GFY sheep banner? grrr
Lol, at pinned, you already proved my point with the report you posted. I already referred to the Masters and Johnson reports, let me guess you are refuting those also. What's the point in posting reports if all your going to do is just say "I refute those", its like talking to a wall. What's your take on the Cosmopolitan survey of two years ago where 50k women were surveyed and 37% said they could orgasm during intercourse with no clitoral stimulation. Thousands of women report being able to achieve orgasm without the clit coming into play, whats your reponse to all of them? Do you just call them liars and refute their claims? Give me an hour with your wife and I will gladly show you that the vaginal orgasm exists, you'll have to believe your wife.
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..
Originally posted by lazycash Lol, at pinned, you already proved my point with the report you posted. I already referred to the Masters and Johnson reports, let me guess you are refuting those also. What's the point in posting reports if all your going to do is just say "I refute those", its like talking to a wall. What's your take on the Cosmopolitan survey of two years ago where 50k women were surveyed and 37% said they could orgasm during intercourse with no clitoral stimulation. Thousands of women report being able to achieve orgasm without the clit coming into play, whats your reponse to all of them? Do you just call them liars and refute their claims? Give me an hour with your wife and I will gladly show you that the vaginal orgasm exists, you'll have to believe your wife.
Lazy ...
as I started off ...
I have six pack of beer ...
now I have a beer buzz ...
Originally posted by sexeducation Lazy ...
as I started off ...
I have six pack of beer ...
now I have a beer buzz ...
It's simple oh little mind with no substance.
POST THE FUCKING LINK ...
POST ONE FUCKING LINK ...
otherwise drop it - I have.
Now I know this whole charade of yours is just a joke. I've cited three major studies and reports done in this area. If you were the expert you claimed you would already know about these and would not need a link to comment on them. Don't waste my time next time with this little game of yours. If you want to throw out wild unsubstantiated claims, at least have some knowledge in the field you are referring to. If I can't engage in an intelligent conversation with you without you even knowing about any of the major studies done in this area without you yapping "link" then this is pointless.
Do your research before you open your mouth and at least learn about the most major and obvious studies done in this area. It's obvious that you have struggled all your life to give a woman a vaginal orgasm and this is the driving force behind your claims. Just for your knowledge, its much harder to give a woman a vaginal orgasm when you are working a four inch cock.
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..
Comment