Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Connor
That's not entirely an inappropriate opinion... I can see how you might feel that way. There was a period of time when I too questioned the FSC's dedication to helping the online industry. I do believe, however, that things have changed. And regarding what you are saying about being proactive rather than reactive, I think you should chat with Michelle, the relatively new Executive Director of the FSC. She feels exactly the same way, as do I. The FSC is the industry's best shot at defending itself, both proactively and reactively.  |
Great. Then they probably should hire me as a spokesperson, 'cause they sure as hell do a fucking shitty job at informing people about what they're doing. Honest, aside from the latest 2257 thingy, I've NEVER heard of the FSC do ANYTHING for this industry. I think Larry Flynt's done a thing here and there, but the FSC? Sorry, can't think of a single thing.
EDIT: In fact, I think that if the FSC would be smart enough, then they'd ride the waves of their recent success in battling 2257 in order to rally more support for supporting the industry. Thing is, who the fuck represents THEM?