Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
I see the difference by indexing and stealing. Do you? If its in the library for free anyway, whats the big deal?
|
I dont see a difference.. If i publish a book, i wan't it read in a certain way , its art , it would be like reproducing andy warhol on pabst beer labels..
Can i "index" my monthly issue of playboy ? I think not...
As i said initially you didnt read far enough , its an opt-out approach meaning publishers/authors have no choice unless they contact google..
Would it be all right for me to reproduce playboy/hustler/time magazine/people etc every month, for "indexing" ..
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
From the article on yahoo (which is their competitor) they make it sound that this is not good for the publishers and that they will not pay them. Thats cheap propaganda. Now do some research, instead of believing all thats written on the web:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/...r-to-find.html
Google themself write; " ..direct potential buyers to your website, provide ongoing reports about user interest in your books, and your books will also earn revenue from contextual advertising"
 |
So yahoo is "cheap propoganda" then you quote google writing propoganda for itself.. ?.
I posted the yahoo link for a reason , this is gfy , if i had posted 50 indy news links nobody would have read past the first line.