Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blazin
No need to create a list. Bush is the only one that has threatened violence and regime change.
Everyone else wants to pursue this via diplomacy, including my own countries Prime Minister Tony Blair. The EU3 has NOT threatened them with violence but they have offered economic incentives for complying.
|
Look I hate Bush as much as anyone here.. However that doesn't stop me from seeing what needs to happen. If it would have been up to me and I was running the war on Terror. Personally I would have bombed the Saud's because everyone knows that where the issue really comes from.
Do I think America should be in the nation building business? Nope I sure as hell don't because we suck ass at it and history has proven that. However as I posted above there are certain countries that do not need to have nukes and Iran is defiantly one of them.
Support for this has nothing to do with supporting Bush and co.. It has to do with keeping a rogue nation from having nukes. North Korea already has them, do we really need another country like that to have them? I think not.
You speak of diplomacy what are you going to do sit and sip tea with them and they tell you to fuck off anyway? Hell even Russia offered to build them a reactor and they would keep control of it, but Iran even turned that down.
Iran isn't interested in diplomacy anymore than Bush is.. In fact I'm betting Iran is looking at how North Korea dealt with Bush and I bet they think they can do the same. Unfortunately for them that won't be the case, as it was too late to do anything about North Korea, but it's not too late to stop Iran..