Quote:
|
Originally Posted by media
LOL... This has no significant meaning. The company is doing great and has a boatload of funding, just ask those that we've been paying multiple thousands of dollars to for the overhaul of the program.
If you want to try and pull off some stupid shit like this then bring in more factual data like bounced checks, forclosures shit like that.. That little blurb has NOTHING to do with the current financial status of the program and what/whose money is being spent.
If you have doubts about our status, come talk to me, my contact details are on the support page, I'd be more than happy to enlighten you.
|
It's not THAT funny. It may mean nothing in terms of being able to conduct day-to-day operations, but one has to wonder why a company with "boatload of funding" somehow forgets to pay a silly amount to make sure there is a current list of officers, as required by law.. Or does someone doesn't want the list to be made public?
Not suggesting anything, just bringing up this issue.