Paco, of Large Cash.

eroswebmaster;

man alive did I have you pegged incorrectly.

Many throw that word out (TERRORIST), usually devoid of meaning. I see it for what it is: a last line of defense, used by the unfettered lambs of an obsolete outdated and WAY out of context set of social standards, edited and reedited, simply to fit various prophets fancy: [I]He did so ?I mean it, God (or the bastard known as Jesus) spoke to me, while I was eating blue-green mushrooms, behind the tent..


Terror
violence (as bombing) committed by groups in order to intimidate a population or government into granting their demands <insurrection and revolutionary terror>

that's the cherry of a typical GFY reply: If you were to take five and G00g that shit so to familiarize yourself with FUCKING HISTORY, you maybe would have provided a valid response, not 'you a doo-doo head' - one of pure ignorance (without knowledge) - but that quality of retort was expected.

Care to explain what makes me a terrorist ? ?

Alternatively, maybe I touch a little too close to the religious home base.

Or, did yah merely pick the wrong word?

What do you even KNOW about religions; and the history of?

The Muslims and Christians have been at it for nearly one-dmillennia (but you knew that ... right), and they will continue to do this so long as they remain.

And the fucking Papacy (as with the Muslims and other Christians) had one purist intention, CONVERT OR DESTROY.

Don?t even get me started on the sainted Christian ? half the motherfuckers are murders! Just like the Muslims: from murder to martyr.

Simple research would have provided a valid response.

So now, I ask you ... do you even know the definition of terrorism (?) ... or was the typical backed-into-a-corner-come-out-swinging-cause-I-have-no-real-defense type of response? (Most likely.)