Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BlueDesignStudios
But hold on Lee, you posted this:
If you want paying for the design work i ordered from you almost 2 years ago, post a sample of the 'design' work you supposedly did for me and also make a statement that it is the same quality as work in your regular design portfolio.
Let GFY decide if the work passes the 'quality test', the ball is in your court
Post the work, if it is of a good quality, as voted for by GFY'ers you'll get paid, if it doesnt meet the quality of the other sites in your portfolio, you are shit out of luck, i have nothing to lose here, do you?
That was only yesterday - you said you would pay based on GFY decides - so what's your excuse now??
|
Indeed i did.
Did you post the samples? No.
Did GFY agree that the quality was your usual standard? No.
I dont see where the problem is.
Just to be sure you read GFY'ers opinions though, here is a brief recap for you..
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dalai lama
banners & main.html looks like it could use more work 
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrthumbs
I agree.. woudlnt accept that work either
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brujah
I agree with you about the banners, and main. Doesn't look like the usual BDS quality I've seen in their portfolio and when others have posted samples.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Doctor Dre
I have to agree that this isn't what I'd call "outstanding work".
The ideas aren't so bad ... but it seems like the guy who did the job isn't a pro and very experienced graphists ... did a lot of mistakes a lot of new graphists do .
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
The sites dont look like his other design examples
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Relish XXX
I will agree that the main page and banners need work.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gunni
not the best design from them for sure
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheDoc
I'm not sure why people here though are bitching that you did something wrong by not paying them. If "you" aren't happy with the work and you didn't publish the work then you shouldn't pay for the work until you are happy with the work. Period..
I don't pay for designs unless I'm happy with the work. I don't pay an electrician for work if I'm not satisfied with his job. I don't pay the cleaning lady if she does a shitty job, I make her ass come back and then I pay her once the job is done correctly. This is how the world works, not the other way around.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Godsmack
I agree, does not look like their quality standard.. maybe it was outsourced? :-)
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cherrylula
it looks stripped down.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rezdesign
looks like crap to me
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chazer
It's not all that great design
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MickeyG
I wouldn't pay for that shit either
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Matt 26z
LOL What total bullshit.
Webmasters choose a designer based on their portfolio.
If the end result isn't of the same quality level that their portfolio implies they are capable of, then it's a bait and switch.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BiggleJones
I really hate to say it, but I think Lee has a legit point about the quality of the design. I dont think the quality is up there with the rest BDS sites.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by basschick
so they didn't use the colors you required, and we can see how grainy things are.
i dunno - i don't expect to pay for designs i don't like. plenty of designers have managed to meet my requirements, but if you make a design in a totally other color scheme, you can 100% expect that i won't be buying it.
i don't know the guy at blue, but i wouldn't have been thrilled with these.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net
banner and main layout not that hot
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net
By looking at the navigation bar.. it seems outsourced... 
|
Regards,
Lee