Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
What you learn from watching Fox News:
Bill Clinton put the U.S. military at risk by getting a blowjob.
George W. Bush did not put the U.S. military at risk by lying about reasons for sending the U.S. military to war with a country who did not attack America.
 |
How times do i have to say this The blowjob is irrelevant, lying about it to his wife/friends is irrelevant it using government resources to cover up the affair that is the problem (covering up her security risk, giving her the job, calling in favors to get her good jobs to cover up the affair)
As to arguing that bush lied there isn't one single fact anywhere that supports that accusation in fact the report you keep pointing to as proof that he lied (han blix report)
states
"While UNMOVIC has been preparing its own list of current ?unresolved disarmament issues? and ?key remaining disarmament tasks? in response to requirements in resolution 1284 (1999), we find the issues listed in the two reports as unresolved, professionally justified. These reports do not contend that weapons of mass destruction remain in Iraq, but nor do they exclude that possibility. They point to lack of evidence and inconsistencies, which raise question marks, which must be straightened out, if weapons dossiers are to be closed and confidence is to arise. "
The fact is if report proved what you guys keep claiming it proved that would not only be an abuse of power (impeachable offence) but a violation of the Geneva convention (tried for war crimes) and they could have forced Bush to appear before congress to testify, just like they forced Regan.
Hell they don't need proof they all they need it to be is a reasonable possiblity that what he did was wrong and they could call him before congress and force him to testify under oath (just like they did with reagan).