View Single Post
Old 07-14-2005, 12:43 AM  
Alky
Confirmed User
 
Alky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasDreams
I prefer my humble looking 2004 Mustang V-6. The car is dirt cheap in cost, upkeep, and insurance. Couple that with decent driving and tuning skills, and you can laugh at those that spent 5-times as much to still get blown away. Now THAT is Pimpin in Style!!!

you're saying head to head a mustang gt will take a m5?

stock 2005 ford mustang gt: Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 5.2 (source: Car&Driver)

stock 2005 bmw m5: Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 4.7

hell...
2004 bmw m3: Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 4.8

m series would eat a mustang alive. period.
Alky is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote