Question about 2257

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • UnclePecker
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jun 2004
    • 266

    #1

    Question about 2257

    Sup...

    I'm unclear about something. Under the new regulations do secondary producers only need copies of the photo ID's of the models or also copies of the model releases? I ask because several content suppliers have only sent
    me scans of the photo ID cards but some have sent me both ID's and model release forms.

    Thanks
  • Paul Waters
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2003
    • 4402

    #2
    You only need photo IDs.

    You do not need the model's address. Ontario health cards are perfect ID for 2257!



    Paul

    Comment

    • TheWylders
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2004
      • 623

      #3
      As far as the regs go, you don't need a release only a photo ID. A model release is a good idea to have just to cover your ass, but as far as 2257 is concerned just the Id is required.

      Comment

      • Paul Waters
        Confirmed User
        • Mar 2003
        • 4402

        #4
        You should also get a detailed receipt from the producer, and that receipt should state, among other things, that a commercial model release is on file, and that you have permission to use the images.


        Paul

        Comment

        • NaughtyRob
          Two fresh affiliate progs
          • Nov 2004
          • 29602

          #5
          Originally posted by TheWylders
          As far as the regs go, you don't need a release only a photo ID. A model release is a good idea to have just to cover your ass, but as far as 2257 is concerned just the Id is required.
          You also need to prove "date of production."
          [email protected]
          Skype: 17026955414
          Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

          Comment

          • Azlord
            Confirmed User
            • Dec 2003
            • 2651

            #6
            what about the list of URLs where the model is located? and all the names ever used by them? heh what a joke

            Comment

            • 2257-Ben
              Confirmed User
              • Jun 2005
              • 633

              #7
              As a matter of fact, having the releases in your 2257 information could make you subject to criminal prosecution... The photo id is all that is required.
              2257-Ben
              www.2257ware.com
              The BEST, most compliant 2257 record-keeping software available. Period.

              Comment

              • 2257-Ben
                Confirmed User
                • Jun 2005
                • 633

                #8
                Originally posted by Azlord
                what about the list of URLs where the model is located? and all the names ever used by them? heh what a joke
                The model has to provide you with the AKAs... as far as the URLs, keep watching our progress with the software at http://www.2257ware.com I've been working my ass off on some really cool technology to allow you to not only catalog the site but automatically build the list of URLs for the productions.
                2257-Ben
                www.2257ware.com
                The BEST, most compliant 2257 record-keeping software available. Period.

                Comment

                • BrainCash JF
                  Registered User
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 81

                  #9
                  Originally posted by UnclePecker
                  Sup...

                  I'm unclear about something. Under the new regulations do secondary producers only need copies of the photo ID's of the models or also copies of the model releases? I ask because several content suppliers have only sent
                  me scans of the photo ID cards but some have sent me both ID's and model release forms.

                  Thanks

                  I stongly recommand you get the model release...what's good an ID without the production date ? how can you tell that a model was 18 and over when she shot the scene ....

                  ...Finally, claimed these commenters, the term date of
                  production is also vague in that it is not clear how a producer should
                  date a film made over several days. The Department declines to adopt
                  this comment. Given the statute's purpose of protecting minors against
                  sexual exploitation, with respect to primary producers, clearly the
                  date of production is the most pertinent because it will reflect the
                  youngest age of the performer involved. Secondary producers should list
                  whichever date or dates are relevant to their conduct. Moreover, this
                  requirement already existed before the proposed rule was published, and
                  therefore, this comment does not pertain to the proposed rule. See 28
                  CFR 75.6(a)(2) (2003).....

                  I don't see what is better than the model release as a legal document that shows date of production and legal name of the model
                  SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                  Comment

                  Working...