View Single Post
Old 06-25-2005, 10:37 AM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Basic_man
I think so. I wouldn't take the chance..

the vagueness in definitions is understandable, especially if MILF type content is being asked to provide 2257 documenation

so while you could argue with the DOJ inspectors that the model is clearly over 18, the law does allow for inspection of ANY model records that are "sexuallly explicit".

So even having granny models that are sticking things into them, you still have to have 2257 documentation, and still have to answer their inquiries.



Fight the granny imagery!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote