Originally posted by quiet
i won't bother getting into some bs argument over cars. read this article (just one of many, many i can pull up):
http://caranddriver.com/article.asp?...&page_number=1
the S2000 is a pure, raw sports car. The 350Z is not. not that this has anything to do with why you should buy one car vs the other (you can buy a civic and spend a couple K and the car will destroy most any exotic) but the S2000 is quicker to 60, and the quarter mile in ever review i've read. i can also pull up those links if you like... having said that, i think the 350Z is a great car.
i won't bother getting into some bs argument over cars. read this article (just one of many, many i can pull up):
http://caranddriver.com/article.asp?...&page_number=1
the S2000 is a pure, raw sports car. The 350Z is not. not that this has anything to do with why you should buy one car vs the other (you can buy a civic and spend a couple K and the car will destroy most any exotic) but the S2000 is quicker to 60, and the quarter mile in ever review i've read. i can also pull up those links if you like... having said that, i think the 350Z is a great car.
What it comes down to when you have a class of car that is so close is the ability of the driver in a given condition.
From the link you gave me I would own any of the cars mentioned...
Audi TT Quattro
BMW Z4 3.0
Honda S2000
Nissan 350Z Touring
Porsche Boxster
But I would take an Audi A4 before a TT


Get the ferrari


Yes, I've heard rumors.




Comment