Are You On The DOJ's Newly Aquired 'Target' List?

**Giorgio_Xo** · 06-23-2005, 09:39 AM

Fake drama. It is a major violation of Federal law for FSC to hand over its member list to the DOJ. You are talking out of your ass.

**European Lee** · 06-23-2005, 09:41 AM

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo

Fake drama. It is a major violation of Federal law for FSC to hand over its member list to the DOJ. You are talking out of your ass.

So how can the FSC give their members protection under this agreement they have made without the US government knowing WHO their members are? Think about it Sparky

Regards,

Lee

**dopeman** · 06-23-2005, 09:42 AM

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo

Fake drama. It is a major violation of Federal law for FSC to hand over its member list to the DOJ. You are talking out of your ass.

so how do the feds know who they can or can't go after?

**Giorgio_Xo** · 06-23-2005, 09:42 AM

Originally posted by European Lee

So how can the FSC give their members protection under this agreement they have made without the US government knowing WHO their members are? Think about it Sparky

Regards,

Lee

All a member would need to do is state membership at the moment of inspection. The DOJ is still free to inspect, they just can't act on it if the injunction is filed in favor. The government could theoretically assemble a list by visiting each and every webmaster, but they don't have the resources to do so.

**Giorgio_Xo** · 06-23-2005, 09:45 AM

Originally posted by dopeman

so how do the feds know who they can or can't go after?

They don't.

**tranza** · 06-23-2005, 09:45 AM

That would piss off lot's of the big sponsors around...

**dopeman** · 06-23-2005, 09:46 AM

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo

All a member would need to do is state membership at the moment of inspection. The DOJ is still free to inspect, they just can't act on it if the injunction is filed in favor. The government could theoretically assemble a list by visiting each and every webmaster, but they don't have the resources to do so.

have you read the specific deal they cut? not being a smart ass, but do you know something we don't about what the feds can or can't do right now?

**BoogieCFZ** · 06-23-2005, 09:53 AM

Not to go agree'ing with lee left and right here but...

yup.

**Mr.Fiction** · 06-23-2005, 10:00 AM

If you write your legal expenses off on your taxes, the government already has that information.

The Bush administration is not Acacia. They have already shown they are willing to break laws to get what they want. I doubt they care about the FSC mailing list.

**Janet Reno** · 06-23-2005, 10:05 AM

Originally posted by European Lee

So how can the FSC give their members protection under this agreement they have made without the US government knowing WHO their members are? Think about it Sparky

Regards,

Lee

Which is why being a member will not protect you. If they succeed in getting a TRO, the laws will not be enforced for anyone, not just members of the FSC.

**Mrs. Lenny2** · 06-23-2005, 10:09 AM

acquired

**Centurion** · 06-23-2005, 10:13 AM

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo

Fake drama. It is a major violation of Federal law for FSC to hand over its member list to the DOJ. You are talking out of your ass.

Then how will the DOJ know if you are a member of the FSC coalition and free from prosecution then?

**Centurion** · 06-23-2005, 10:14 AM

Originally posted by Giorgio_Xo

All a member would need to do is state membership at the moment of inspection. The DOJ is still free to inspect, they just can't act on it if the injunction is filed in favor.

No..they would NOT be able to "still inspect" under the injunction. Part of the injunction is "no unreasonable search and seizure."

Are You On The DOJ's Newly Aquired 'Target' List?

Are You On The DOJ's Newly Aquired 'Target' List?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment