Originally posted by boobmaster
It is no different than sucking the blood off a finger or foot. You assign a sexual purpose to it simply because it involves a sexual organ. But to have a sexual purpose, there must be sexual intent. THERE CLEARLY WAS NO SEXUAL INTENT. If you think the rabbi is a sex pervert, you are a complete moron. You people are the only ones thinking sex here. Thus, you are the perverts, not the rabbi. The fact that a disease was spread in this case makes it all the easier to bitch. I agree that they should have taken greater precautions, but I do not consider this child molestation in any sense.
It is no different than sucking the blood off a finger or foot. You assign a sexual purpose to it simply because it involves a sexual organ. But to have a sexual purpose, there must be sexual intent. THERE CLEARLY WAS NO SEXUAL INTENT. If you think the rabbi is a sex pervert, you are a complete moron. You people are the only ones thinking sex here. Thus, you are the perverts, not the rabbi. The fact that a disease was spread in this case makes it all the easier to bitch. I agree that they should have taken greater precautions, but I do not consider this child molestation in any sense.
Just because something is religious or traditional does not make it right.


:: 





Comment