06-17-2005, 01:04 AM
|
|
|
Tube groupie.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: LoScandalous, CA
Posts: 13,482
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chadglni
XXXJay, why has a judge already ruled on the secondary producer aspect of 2257? Was this in a recent case or from someone trying to label a website owner a producer before the new regs were proposed?
|
http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=229097 |
|
|