Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scooby doo as scooby does
The first one is not normal. The second one kinda is, although sometimes it's predicated by some form of 'in the event of misuse or illegal content, spam, abuse of AUP or something.'
I would not host with any company who gave themselves the right to alter the contract like that, it leaves you open to all kinds of possible problems.
I should clarify this by saying 'in my experience', which basically means unmanaged dedicateds.
|
The second one initially states that they have the right in the event of misuse, but then it's followed by we "have the right to refuse service and/or access to its servers to anyone."
Regarding the first one, I think they should adjust it to state what they say they mean, as in that their listed prices can change, but that it wouldn't affect what current clients pay; as in, the rate they initially pay is a fixed rate.
Is that not standard?
Matt