comusthumbs vs autogallery sql

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bllott
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2004
    • 2368

    #1

    comusthumbs vs autogallery sql

    I noticed they are pretty similar, one costs way more than the other. I would like to know what the differences are and which one is better for thumbs tgps and why

    thanks in advance
  • fireorange
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2005
    • 1648

    #2
    They're not similar at all.
    Comus has more advanced features.
    AutoGallery SQL is prefered by beginners and is easy to use & install.

    Comment

    • fireorange
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2005
      • 1648

      #3
      If you're new to Thumb sites I recommend AutoGallery SQL if you're gonna be accepting gallery submissions or TGP Rotator if you're gonna be 100% FHG.

      Comment

      • bllott
        Confirmed User
        • Mar 2004
        • 2368

        #4
        Originally posted by fireorange
        They're not similar at all.
        Comus has more advanced features.
        AutoGallery SQL is prefered by beginners and is easy to use & install.
        ok so the trial comus has all the features from what i read but skims at 2% and has ads, that's the difference between full and trial comus?

        Comment

        • DamageX
          Marketing & Strategy
          • Jun 2001
          • 14293

          #5
          Originally posted by bllott
          ok so the trial comus has all the features from what i read but skims at 2% and has ads, that's the difference between full and trial comus?
          It doesn't have ads.
          Whitehat is for chumps

          If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!

          Comment

          Working...