Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jonesy
I agree with your assesment, it was definitly discussed and was part of the equation but was not the primary reason for settling.
100 million in 1993? dont think so but Jackson at that time had the money to prove his innocence and woudve done so.
You have a minor who described what jacksons cock looked like, there are pictures of jacksons cock as evidence and they match the descriptions so you sure as fuck dont go to trial you settle.
And being that Johhny Cochran was Jacksons lawyer, he sure as fuck wasnt going to defend a case that was going to lose.
|
The 100 million was just a figure in my head but that would include ( at the time ) the future loss of revenue due to the bad publicity win or lose from the orginal case not just the court cost..
As far as the penis thing goes, theres hundreds of reasonable explanations for that ( besides him just being a freak ).
In everyday reality land theres no reason a small boy should know of a birthmark on jacksons ballsack. BUT is there a reasonable explanation to how he could have known that ... yes
Most of it i blame on the parents for leaving the kids with him.. It would be like leaving your 8 year old daughter with paris hilton.. .. notlikely