Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dopeman
the government is saying that secondary producers should have had them the entire time. they shouldn't have posted those thumbnails or AVS sites without the model IDs.
|
yes, i understand this. even more so then. the studios and content producers didn't disseminate records for that exact reason, i am sure of it. and secondary producer was vaguely defined and that was the gray area. what was the interpretation of "secondary producer". basically i feel they are more at fault now, because they have had the opportunity now to adjust this law to a more "spirit of the law" approach, instead of a "letter of the law" approach. they have drastically blown it by requiring companies to give out their information to comply.
i am pretty sure that they know that most agreements made by the content producers dont have the stipulation that the id's can be passed on to secondary producers, as in the case of a program like Extreme Paychecks who has always had it in their agreements.
im up to about $80.00 in
posts on 2257 and about 100 bucks worth on COPA when it was the issue.
