View Single Post
Old 06-05-2005, 03:43 PM  
NaughtyRob
Two fresh affiliate progs
 
NaughtyRob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Inside teen pussy
Posts: 29,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by chase
No the DOJ specifically declined "sanitized" copies.

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...5/05-10107.htm
[[Page 29615]] (it's about half-way down the page says:
"Another commenter proposed that secondary producers be required to
store sanitized (i.e., without personal information such as home
address) hard or digital copies of performers' identification documents
along with a notarized affidavit from the primary producer stating the
location of the complete records. The Department declines to adopt this
comment. Although the Department understands the commenter's desire to
protect private information about performers from being too widely
disseminated, it believes that the suggested plan would be overly
burdensome on primary producers and add an unnecessary layer of
complexity to the record-keeping process. Primary producers would be
required first to sanitize the identification documents and then to
draft, sign, and pay for a notarized affidavit. It is simpler and less
burdensome simply to have primary producers transfer a copy of the
records to secondary producers."

This is the exact part that I find ridiculous. What if we dont think it is burdensome. What do they think we are fucking lazy?
NaughtyRob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote