2257 remark....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paraskass
    Confirmed User
    • May 2002
    • 5829

    #1

    2257 remark....

    If 2257 affects secondary distributors of sexual material, such as webmasters using thumbs to link to hosted galleries, wouldn't it also mean that video stores (be it rental places or purchase points) along with corner stores that sell erotic magazines all fall under the same category and also become secondary distributors, requiring places such as 7/11 to be able to provide access to 2257 documents for the models featured in the magazines they sell?
  • hwood
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2004
    • 332

    #2
    chuuuch...
    http://www.nastywhitehoes.com
    http://www.bootytrade.com
    Check out My Black XXX sites

    Comment

    • gornyhuy
      Chafed.
      • May 2002
      • 18041

      #3
      Only if they print the pictures on their walls?
      Technically you can't look at the skin mags until after you buy and leave the store.

      But what the fuck do I know. This whole thing has me spinning.

      icq:159548293

      Comment

      • Paraskass
        Confirmed User
        • May 2002
        • 5829

        #4
        Originally posted by gornyhuy
        Only if they print the pictures on their walls?
        Technically you can't look at the skin mags until after you buy and leave the store.

        But what the fuck do I know. This whole thing has me spinning.
        You can enter a video store that sells XXX movies and look at the pictures on the back of the box. (in a rental place or in a shop).

        Correct me if I am wrong.

        If it doesn't apply to video stores, it then couldn't possibly apply to a TGP with non-nude thumbs linking to content because only AFTER you click the thumb do you see the content.

        no?

        Comment

        • Lycanthrope
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2004
          • 4517

          #5
          It says nothing about secondary distribution, it is secondary production that is mentioned.

          Video / book stores are not producing anything, they are merely distributing it.

          However, let's say they ripped this month's hottest DVD to make a commercial out of it to play on monitors throughout the store... then, (copyright laws aside), they would need to have the docs, as they have now (re-)produced something and are secondary producers.

          Putting a text link up on your site = distribution
          Putting a linked image up on your site = reproduction

          Comment

          • Paraskass
            Confirmed User
            • May 2002
            • 5829

            #6
            Originally posted by Lycanthrope
            It says nothing about secondary distribution, it is secondary production that is mentioned.

            Video / book stores are not producing anything, they are merely distributing it.

            However, let's say they ripped this month's hottest DVD to make a commercial out of it to play on monitors throughout the store... then, (copyright laws aside), they would need to have the docs, as they have now (re-)produced something and are secondary producers.

            Putting a text link up on your site = distribution
            Putting a linked image up on your site = reproduction
            So you are saying text TGP's would be immune to 2257 laws?

            There goes the hun, growing again.

            Comment

            • Lycanthrope
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2004
              • 4517

              #7
              Originally posted by Paraskass
              You can enter a video store that sells XXX movies and look at the pictures on the back of the box. (in a rental place or in a shop).

              Correct me if I am wrong.

              If it doesn't apply to video stores, it then couldn't possibly apply to a TGP with non-nude thumbs linking to content because only AFTER you click the thumb do you see the content.

              no?
              Use non nude thumbs, like face only shots, (to be real safe, you could even shy away from "moaning" type pics), and you will be fine. You are now no more offending, hell, even less so, than a JC Penny's catalog.

              The law pertains to images on your server, not to what you are linked to.

              Comment

              • Paraskass
                Confirmed User
                • May 2002
                • 5829

                #8
                Originally posted by Lycanthrope
                Use non nude thumbs, like face only shots, (to be real safe, you could even shy away from "moaning" type pics), and you will be fine. You are now no more offending, hell, even less so, than a JC Penny's catalog.

                The law pertains to images on your server, not to what you are linked to.
                excellent news, if this is true.

                Comment

                • Lycanthrope
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 4517

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Paraskass
                  So you are saying text TGP's would be immune to 2257 laws?

                  There goes the hun, growing again.
                  They aren't immune, what I'm saying is that if they themselves are not displaying images, they have no 2257 issues at hand.

                  Edit:

                  You should / probably will still be required to have a 2257 statement listing your reasons for exception.
                  Last edited by Lycanthrope; 07-25-2004, 06:12 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Veterans Day
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 8403

                    #10
                    text links rock for more than one reason
                    Build a Massive Traffic Network, Hands FREE, Totally Automated

                    Comment

                    • bllott
                      Confirmed User
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 2368

                      #11
                      so does this mean that a regular tgp needs to have the actual links to each site's 2257 compliance listed somewhere on the site?

                      Comment

                      • Paraskass
                        Confirmed User
                        • May 2002
                        • 5829

                        #12
                        Originally posted by bllott
                        so does this mean that a regular tgp needs to have the actual links to each site's 2257 compliance listed somewhere on the site?
                        This is what I am wondering, possibly not, if the thumbs and pics on the TGP do not show nudity or sexual poses?

                        Comment

                        • Veterans Day
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 8403

                          #13
                          Originally posted by bllott
                          so does this mean that a regular tgp needs to have the actual links to each site's 2257 compliance listed somewhere on the site?
                          no it means if you have sexually explicit thumbs YOU need to have the 2257 docs on file at YOUR office for those thumbs that belong to the other site Ludicrous I tell ya, ludicrous
                          Build a Massive Traffic Network, Hands FREE, Totally Automated

                          Comment

                          • Paraskass
                            Confirmed User
                            • May 2002
                            • 5829

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Veterans Day
                            no it means if you have sexually explicit thumbs YOU need to have the 2257 docs on file at YOUR office for those thumbs that belong to the other site Ludicrous I tell ya, ludicrous
                            so if they are NOT nude, you are safe, as long as you are linking to a gallery NOT on your server.

                            Comment

                            • Lycanthrope
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 4517

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Paraskass
                              so if they are NOT nude, you are safe, as long as you are linking to a gallery NOT on your server.
                              As I, and a competent attorney who owes me some favors understand / interpret it, yes.

                              Remember though, under the new revisions, banners are subject to compliance as well, not just "content" images.

                              Comment

                              • Paraskass
                                Confirmed User
                                • May 2002
                                • 5829

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Lycanthrope
                                As I, and a competent attorney who owes me some favors understand / interpret it, yes.

                                Remember though, under the new revisions, banners are subject to compliance as well, not just "content" images.
                                I use no banners.
                                I hope all this is clarified before the law is voted.

                                When is it supposed to be voted, and if it is acceptted it goes live August 24th right?

                                Comment

                                • bllott
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Mar 2004
                                  • 2368

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Paraskass
                                  I use no banners.
                                  I hope all this is clarified before the law is voted.

                                  When is it supposed to be voted, and if it is acceptted it goes live August 24th right?
                                  that's what i want to know.. and how does it apply to canada-based webmasters?

                                  Comment

                                  • xxxjay
                                    Tube groupie.
                                    • Aug 2002
                                    • 13482

                                    #18
                                    As I understand it - if you have a thumb displayed in your site - even if hot-linked...you need 2257.
                                    http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

                                    Comment

                                    Working...