SEO 302 question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zester
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2003
    • 5344

    #1

    SEO 302 question

    I have a link dump with about 1500 out going links.
    following my friend who advised me a bit about SEO and how much I should lessen outgoing links to PR 0 page I am using a certain "jump" page as a redirection, something like:
    http://mydomain.com/jump.php?url=http://otherdomain.com/page.html

    this is the jump.php
    Code:
    $url=$_REQUEST["url"];
    header("HTTP/1.0 302 bounce");
    header("Location: $url");
    header("Connection: close");
    will this get me into trouble with google? lower my PR?

    here is some good info for ya on the subject (someone may find this interesting as I did):
    http://clsc.net/research/google-302-page-hijack.htm
    * Mainstream ? $65 per sale
    * new male contraception
  • Trax
    [----------------------]
    • Aug 2001
    • 14486

    #2
    it will affect http://otherdomain.com/page.htm not mydomain.com
    302 redirects suck

    Comment

    • Terry
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2002
      • 1604

      #3
      Ggrrrrrrrr 302 !!!!
      TengaCash
      ICQ: 6776764

      Comment

      • Zester
        Confirmed User
        • Jul 2003
        • 5344

        #4
        hmmmm..... ok... 302 is not good... didn't mean to fuck anybody....
        if I change all the out links in my link dump from 302 to 301, will that not kill my SERP ? 1500 out going links to zero page ranked pages?
        * Mainstream ? $65 per sale
        * new male contraception

        Comment

        • Kevsh
          Confirmed User
          • Dec 2004
          • 8619

          #5
          Why not just use the PHP to redirect (w/o writing the 302 portion of the header)? That way, any PR leak will come from the actual PHP script, not the original page the link is on.

          Code:
          $url=$_REQUEST["url"];
          header("Location: $url");

          Comment

          • FilthyRob
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2004
            • 6741

            #6
            I use a 302 redirect in a php script
            AKA - Clubsexy

            Comment

            • alias
              aliasx
              • Apr 2001
              • 19010

              #7
              can you 0 iframe the redirect and or nofollow it in robots.
              ?
              https://porncorporation.com

              Comment

              • swedguy
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2002
                • 7981

                #8
                Originally posted by Kevsh
                Why not just use the PHP to redirect (w/o writing the 302 portion of the header)? That way, any PR leak will come from the actual PHP script, not the original page the link is on.

                Code:
                $url=$_REQUEST["url"];
                header("Location: $url");
                That is a 302 redirect.

                Comment

                • fireorange
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 1648

                  #9
                  Stop wasting your time, stick to gallery submitting.

                  Comment

                  • swedguy
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2002
                    • 7981

                    #10
                    To be honest, I don't really understand why 302 is so bad. 99% of all scripts or sites that has some type of redirect, uses 302. To the regular Joe, he have no clue what the difference is between 301 and 302, the only thing he knows is that he want the surfer to go from A to B.

                    Are Search Engines out to fuck people over or do they actually have common sense? I know what I think.

                    I even had 20-25 single keywords as #1 for a long time and Google had the 302 page listed (it just redirected to a page within the same folder).
                    I have a whole bunch of other legit examples where 302 has been used, without any problems.

                    http://www.google.com/search?num=30&...rn&btnG=Search
                    Pichunter is #1 for free porn.

                    How many 302 redirects do you think he has pointing to him? LOTS. All the trade scripts are 302 redirects. Do you think he would be #1 if 302's are so bad?

                    Comment

                    • fireorange
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jan 2005
                      • 1648

                      #11
                      It's all about META TAGS baby

                      Comment

                      • Zester
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 5344

                        #12
                        Originally posted by swedguy
                        That is a 302 redirect.
                        some info I read (mentioned here already):
                        1) any redirection like:
                        header (location: something);

                        gives a 302 unless specified otherwise

                        2) most trading scripts today use 302
                        * Mainstream ? $65 per sale
                        * new male contraception

                        Comment

                        • TheJimmy
                          ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0
                          • Jan 2001
                          • 10747

                          #13
                          Originally posted by fireorange
                          It's all about META TAGS baby
                          yes, this is true, it's ALLLLLLL about the meta tags...

                          I'm glad to see some people are catching on...


                          Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.

                          Comment

                          • Zester
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jul 2003
                            • 5344

                            #14
                            here are my questions (more accurately) again in case someone actually would like to answer them:

                            1) will a site (site 1) using a 302 to link to another site (site 2) be harmed in any way SEO speaking? (PR penalty, google ban etc.)

                            2) will a link from a certain site (site 1) to another (site 2) using 302 method (e.g: http://site1.com/jump.php?url=site2 be counted as a backlink to site2 ?

                            3) will a link from a certain site (site 1) to another (site 2) using 301 method (e.g: http://site1.com/jump.php?url=site2 be counted as a backlink to site2 ?
                            Last edited by Zester; 06-03-2005, 10:42 AM.
                            * Mainstream ? $65 per sale
                            * new male contraception

                            Comment

                            • monkeysnap
                              Confirmed User
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 604

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Zester
                              some info I read (mentioned here already):
                              1) any redirection like:
                              header (location: something);

                              gives a 302 unless specified otherwise

                              2) most trading scripts today use 302
                              In the scripts I code for my sites I use the following:

                              header("Refresh: 0; URL=http://blahblahblah");

                              That prevents a 302.


                              .
                              I make sex games and you might also know me as 'orange'.

                              Comment

                              • cambaby
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 3141

                                #16
                                Yes it will get you in trouble

                                Comment

                                • fireorange
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jan 2005
                                  • 1648

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Zester
                                  here are my questions (more accurately) again in case someone actually would like to answer them:

                                  1) will a site (site 1) using a 302 to link to another site (site 2) be harmed in any way SEO speaking? (PR penalty, google ban etc.)

                                  2) will a link from a certain site (site 1) to another (site 2) using 302 method (e.g: http://site1.com/jump.php?url=site2 be counted as a backlink to site2 ?

                                  3) will a link from a certain site (site 1) to another (site 2) using 301 method (e.g: http://site1.com/jump.php?url=site2 be counted as a backlink to site2 ?
                                  1) META TAGS
                                  2) Google Priority ID
                                  3) There's no money in SEO

                                  Hope that helps.

                                  Comment

                                  • Zester
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jul 2003
                                    • 5344

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by monkeysnap
                                    In the scripts I code for my sites I use the following:

                                    header("Refresh: 0; URL=http://blahblahblah");

                                    That prevents a 302.


                                    .
                                    isn't that the same as redirection?
                                    i think the result in that case is a 302 as well
                                    * Mainstream ? $65 per sale
                                    * new male contraception

                                    Comment

                                    • xenigo
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Jan 2001
                                      • 8067

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by TheJimmy
                                      yes, this is true, it's ALLLLLLL about the meta tags...

                                      I'm glad to see some people are catching on...


                                      Last time I checked, it's all about content. Better go re-read your SEO handbook.

                                      Comment

                                      • Zester
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jul 2003
                                        • 5344

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by xenigo
                                        Last time I checked, it's all about content. Better go re-read your SEO handbook.
                                        i think he was joking, meta tags are ignored by most search engines today
                                        * Mainstream ? $65 per sale
                                        * new male contraception

                                        Comment

                                        • swedguy
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jan 2002
                                          • 7981

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Zester
                                          isn't that the same as redirection?
                                          i think the result in that case is a 302 as well
                                          HTTP/1.1 200 OK
                                          Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 11:25:13 GMT
                                          Server: Apache/1.3.29 (Unix) PHP/4.3.6
                                          X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.6
                                          Refresh: 0; URL=http://blahblahblah
                                          Content-Type: text/html


                                          Never seen that way before.

                                          Comment

                                          • Zester
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Jul 2003
                                            • 5344

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by swedguy
                                            HTTP/1.1 200 OK
                                            Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 11:25:13 GMT
                                            Server: Apache/1.3.29 (Unix) PHP/4.3.6
                                            X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.6
                                            Refresh: 0; URL=http://blahblahblah
                                            Content-Type: text/html


                                            Never seen that way before.
                                            this is getting interesting
                                            now the quesiton is how will google see this? is this a backlink to "http://blahblahblah" ? there is no hijack here is there?
                                            * Mainstream ? $65 per sale
                                            * new male contraception

                                            Comment

                                            • Zester
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Jul 2003
                                              • 5344

                                              #23
                                              bump.................
                                              * Mainstream ? $65 per sale
                                              * new male contraception

                                              Comment

                                              Working...