GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

swedguy · 06-03-2005, 10:53 AM

To be honest, I don't really understand why 302 is so bad. 99% of all scripts or sites that has some type of redirect, uses 302. To the regular Joe, he have no clue what the difference is between 301 and 302, the only thing he knows is that he want the surfer to go from A to B.

Are Search Engines out to fuck people over or do they actually have common sense? I know what I think.

I even had 20-25 single keywords as #1 for a long time and Google had the 302 page listed (it just redirected to a page within the same folder).
I have a whole bunch of other legit examples where 302 has been used, without any problems.

http://www.google.com/search?num=30&...rn&btnG=Search
Pichunter is #1 for free porn.

How many 302 redirects do you think he has pointing to him? LOTS. All the trade scripts are 302 redirects. Do you think he would be #1 if 302's are so bad?

06-03-2005, 10:53 AM
swedguy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 7,981	To be honest, I don't really understand why 302 is so bad. 99% of all scripts or sites that has some type of redirect, uses 302. To the regular Joe, he have no clue what the difference is between 301 and 302, the only thing he knows is that he want the surfer to go from A to B. Are Search Engines out to fuck people over or do they actually have common sense? I know what I think. I even had 20-25 single keywords as #1 for a long time and Google had the 302 page listed (it just redirected to a page within the same folder). I have a whole bunch of other legit examples where 302 has been used, without any problems. http://www.google.com/search?num=30&...rn&btnG=Search Pichunter is #1 for free porn. How many 302 redirects do you think he has pointing to him? LOTS. All the trade scripts are 302 redirects. Do you think he would be #1 if 302's are so bad?