Can someone explain the new proposed changes in PLAIN ENGLISH?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • iwantchixx
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Oct 2002
    • 12860

    #1

    Can someone explain the new proposed changes in PLAIN ENGLISH?

    I can never wrap my head around legal jargon, fuckign talking in circles is all they do with ref to this ref to that and ref back to something I read 10 mins ago that is contradicting to itself.
  • Jace
    FBOP Class Of 2013
    • Jan 2004
    • 35562

    #2
    they aren't proposed changes, they are definite changes that will go into effect on the 24th of august

    basically, if you run a server and have naked images on the server for the people to view, you have to have full 2257 docs on that model...and each pic has to be cross referenced in a database

    this includes banner ads, pics, videos, etc....ANY naked picture must have documentation to go with it

    Comment

    • polish_aristocrat
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Jul 2002
      • 40377

      #3
      Pay me $100 per domain and you can put my polish whois info there and i will answer all cals :D
      I don't use ICQ anymore.

      Comment

      • Jace
        FBOP Class Of 2013
        • Jan 2004
        • 35562

        #4
        Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
        Pay me $100 per domain and you can put my polish whois info there and i will answer all cals :D
        all that will get you is polish whois, it won't get you exemption from the law

        Comment

        • iwantchixx
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Oct 2002
          • 12860

          #5
          Originally posted by JaceXXX
          they aren't proposed changes, they are definite changes that will go into effect on the 24th of august

          basically, if you run a server and have naked images on the server for the people to view, you have to have full 2257 docs on that model...and each pic has to be cross referenced in a database

          this includes banner ads, pics, videos, etc....ANY naked picture must have documentation to go with it
          so basically I have to keep a central page that contains all information on that model as she appears on my own server and link to it from every page that model appears on right? What if jonny on another server uses the same model? Does he have to link to that same page of mine from his? Or is it totally seperate? What happens if it's old pages that cannot be deleted or changed due to TGP and link list bannings? This severely sucks.

          Comment

          • iwantchixx
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Oct 2002
            • 12860

            #6
            someone deleted their post, I saw it 3 mins ago, dude, don't hide from your coments, they are justified and your own opinion and you have every right to say them, even f it is about a "playa"

            Comment

            • polish_aristocrat
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Jul 2002
              • 40377

              #7
              Originally posted by iwantchixx
              someone deleted their post, I saw it 3 mins ago, dude, don't hide from your coments, they are justified and your own opinion and you have every right to say them, even f it is about a "playa"
              what did he say?
              I don't use ICQ anymore.

              Comment

              • iwantchixx
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Oct 2002
                • 12860

                #8
                Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
                what did he say?
                Nothing that wasen't already said by Jace really. it was a small thing he said that made me think he deleted it for a reason, he just deleted it cause it was easier than editing what he already said.

                Comment

                • 80smetal
                  Registered User
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 505

                  #9
                  naked or sexually explicit content?

                  Comment

                  • Jace
                    FBOP Class Of 2013
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 35562

                    #10
                    Originally posted by iwantchixx
                    so basically I have to keep a central page that contains all information on that model as she appears on my own server and link to it from every page that model appears on right? What if jonny on another server uses the same model? Does he have to link to that same page of mine from his? Or is it totally seperate? What happens if it's old pages that cannot be deleted or changed due to TGP and link list bannings? This severely sucks.
                    jonny has nothing to do with you man

                    you are on your own 100% to do your own docs, nobody else can have your and you can't have anyone elses

                    if you have a naked image for people to see, you have to have the docs on that model, jonny has nothing to do with you

                    Comment

                    • Jace
                      FBOP Class Of 2013
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 35562

                      #11
                      Originally posted by iwantchixx
                      someone deleted their post, I saw it 3 mins ago, dude, don't hide from your coments, they are justified and your own opinion and you have every right to say them, even f it is about a "playa"
                      yeah, that was wierd

                      i went to quote him and it was gone by the time I had the chance

                      Comment

                      • Jace
                        FBOP Class Of 2013
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 35562

                        #12
                        Originally posted by iwantchixx
                        so basically I have to keep a central page that contains all information on that model as she appears on my own server and link to it from every page that model appears on right? What if jonny on another server uses the same model? Does he have to link to that same page of mine from his? Or is it totally seperate? What happens if it's old pages that cannot be deleted or changed due to TGP and link list bannings? This severely sucks.
                        and this isn't a page on the web you keep, this is a local database file you keep on your computer....NEVER make it on the web, 2257 docs contain models info, don't chance that being made public

                        Comment

                        • 80smetal
                          Registered User
                          • Jun 2004
                          • 505

                          #13
                          I run about 50 rate my pic sites, are we talking nude as in tits showing or we talking fucking here, I thought i read somewhere were it was sexually explicit content onlly?

                          Comment

                          • iwantchixx
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 12860

                            #14
                            Originally posted by JaceXXX
                            and this isn't a page on the web you keep, this is a local database file you keep on your computer....NEVER make it on the web, 2257 docs contain models info, don't chance that being made public

                            aaaaaah. So no linking needed. Awesome. I was under impression from others on the board freaking out that we now had to have a publicly viewable 2257 page with information.

                            Comment

                            • iwantchixx
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Oct 2002
                              • 12860

                              #15
                              Originally posted by 80smetal
                              I run about 50 rate my pic sites, are we talking nude as in tits showing or we talking fucking here, I thought i read somewhere were it was sexually explicit content onlly?
                              as far as I know, anything which implies sexual explicit acts and/or nudity

                              Comment

                              • Jace
                                FBOP Class Of 2013
                                • Jan 2004
                                • 35562

                                #16
                                SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONDUCT - Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.

                                Comment

                                • 80smetal
                                  Registered User
                                  • Jun 2004
                                  • 505

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by JaceXXX
                                  they aren't proposed changes, they are definite changes that will go into effect on the 24th of august

                                  basically, if you run a server and have naked images on the server for the people to view, you have to have full 2257 docs on that model...and each pic has to be cross referenced in a database

                                  this includes banner ads, pics, videos, etc....ANY naked picture must have documentation to go with it
                                  (c) Producer means any person, including any individual, corporation, or other organization, who is a primary producer or a secondary producer.
                                  (1) A primary producer is any person who actually films, videotapes, photographs, or creates a computer-generated image, digital image, or picture of, or digitizes an image of, a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct.

                                  (2) A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles, manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, a computer-generated image, digital image, or picture, or other matter intended for commercial distribution that contains a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the content of a computer site or service [JDO: No "commercial" purpose included here.] that contains a visual depiction of, actual sexually explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract, agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.

                                  NOT naked sexually explicit?

                                  Comment

                                  • Jace
                                    FBOP Class Of 2013
                                    • Jan 2004
                                    • 35562

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by iwantchixx
                                    aaaaaah. So no linking needed. Awesome. I was under impression from others on the board freaking out that we now had to have a publicly viewable 2257 page with information.
                                    no, you need to have a page on your site that shows you business address, and it has to be a physical address, not a po box

                                    ALL adult sites HAVE to now have a 2257 page, so when they wanna come and check you out, they know where to knock

                                    Comment

                                    • iwantchixx
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • Oct 2002
                                      • 12860

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by JaceXXX
                                      no, you need to have a page on your site that shows you business address, and it has to be a physical address, not a po box

                                      ALL adult sites HAVE to now have a 2257 page, so when they wanna come and check you out, they know where to knock
                                      gotcha. So any psycho surfer who is offended by the word "teen" can now easier than ever find out where I live and murder my gf and I in our sleep? nice

                                      Comment

                                      • Theo
                                        HAL 9000
                                        • May 2001
                                        • 34515

                                        #20
                                        i don't plan to comply. First i'll have to see few people getting jailed to be bothered

                                        Comment

                                        • Jace
                                          FBOP Class Of 2013
                                          • Jan 2004
                                          • 35562

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by iwantchixx
                                          gotcha. So any psycho surfer who is offended by the word "teen" can now easier than ever find out where I live and murder my gf and I in our sleep? nice
                                          yup...nice, huh?

                                          welcome to the land of Asscrack

                                          Comment

                                          • iwantchixx
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • Oct 2002
                                            • 12860

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by JaceXXX
                                            yup...nice, huh?

                                            welcome to the land of Asscrack

                                            can't we protect ourselves somehow from this? Don't they realize how dangerous this is? fuck

                                            Comment

                                            • Jace
                                              FBOP Class Of 2013
                                              • Jan 2004
                                              • 35562

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by iwantchixx
                                              can't we protect ourselves somehow from this? Don't they realize how dangerous this is? fuck

                                              submit comments here:

                                              and make it professional, and make fucking sense...the better we sounds doing this to more likely they are to listen

                                              http://www.regulations.gov/

                                              do a keyword search on
                                              2723-2004 and then scroll down the page for "Submit a Comment on this Regulation" [comments have to be in by August 24th].

                                              Comment

                                              • iwantchixx
                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                • Oct 2002
                                                • 12860

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by JaceXXX
                                                submit comments here:

                                                and make it professional, and make fucking sense...the better we sounds doing this to more likely they are to listen

                                                http://www.regulations.gov/

                                                do a keyword search on
                                                2723-2004 and then scroll down the page for "Submit a Comment on this Regulation" [comments have to be in by August 24th].

                                                Will do. I think everyone should comment about this. This is what bothers me the most now about all this. It's bad enough that I get death threats in my email amost daily, now all I need is people comming to my door about it.

                                                Comment

                                                • TheJimmy
                                                  ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0
                                                  • Jan 2001
                                                  • 10747

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by JaceXXX

                                                  quote:
                                                  SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONDUCT - Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.




                                                  pretty clear to me that it means


                                                  tits ok (unless the titty bearer is wacking it)

                                                  everything else = bad






                                                  PS:

                                                  take from this page: http://www.regulations.gov/freddocs/04-13792.htm


                                                  "Sec. 75.7 Exemption statement.

                                                  (a) Any producer of any book, magazine, periodical, film,
                                                  videotape, computer-generated image, digital image, picture, or other
                                                  matter may cause to be affixed to every copy of the matter a statement
                                                  attesting that the matter is not covered by the record-keeping
                                                  requirements of 18 U.S.C. 2257(a)-(c) and of this part if:
                                                  (1) The matter contains only visual depictions of actual sexually
                                                  explicit conduct made before November 1, 1990, or is produced,
                                                  manufactured, published, duplicated, reproduced, or reissued before May
                                                  26, 1992;
                                                  (2) The matter contains only visual depictions of simulated
                                                  sexually explicit conduct; or,

                                                  (3) The matter contains only some combination of the visual
                                                  depictions described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section.
                                                  (b) If the primary producer and the secondary producer are
                                                  different entities, the primary producer may certify to the secondary
                                                  producer that the visual depictions in the matter satisfy the standards
                                                  under paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section. The secondary
                                                  producer may then cause to be affixed to every copy of the matter a
                                                  statement attesting that the matter is not covered by the record-
                                                  keeping requirements of 18 U.S.C. 2257(a)-(c) and of this part."
                                                  Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • erehwon
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Nov 2003
                                                    • 3759

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by iwantchixx
                                                    gotcha. So any psycho surfer who is offended by the word "teen" can now easier than ever find out where I live and murder my gf and I in our sleep? nice
                                                    GREAT...

                                                    I think I agree with everyone else, I'll wait for a few prosecutions, buy a better shotgun, and then comply with the regs.
                                                    Money NEVER $leep$...

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Paparazzi
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Mar 2002
                                                      • 3488

                                                      #27
                                                      what if I only use sponsor content...just to link to the sponsors 2257 page from my galleries, free sites etc?

                                                      Pure Level(3) Premium Bandwidth
                                                      When Quality Counts

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Jace
                                                        FBOP Class Of 2013
                                                        • Jan 2004
                                                        • 35562

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by Paparazzi
                                                        what if I only use sponsor content...just to link to the sponsors 2257 page from my galleries, free sites etc?
                                                        dude, ONCE AGAIN

                                                        IF YOU HAVE NAKED IMAGES ON YOUR SERVER YOU HAVE TO COMPLY, YOU CAN NOT POINT TO WHERE THE DOCS MIGHT BE...YOU HAVE TO HAVE THEM PERSONALLY IN YOUR OWN FILING SYSTEM

                                                        Comment

                                                        • latinasojourn
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Oct 2003
                                                          • 3191

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by JaceXXX


                                                          this includes banner ads, pics, videos, etc....ANY naked picture must have documentation to go with it [/B]

                                                          LOTS of misinformation being spewed in these threads.

                                                          only certain types of content are relevant to 2257, go read the law.

                                                          and if you can't read get out of the biz.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Project-Shadow
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Feb 2003
                                                            • 7340

                                                            #30
                                                            Ok I actually have a serious question.
                                                            Do these rules apply to residents of the U.S only?

                                                            I reside in the U.K, but as far as I know my hosts are inside the U.S would this make me exempt from this law, or would I have to make all my sites 2257 complient?

                                                            Fucking pain in the ass this is.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Jace
                                                              FBOP Class Of 2013
                                                              • Jan 2004
                                                              • 35562

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by latinasojourn
                                                              LOTS of misinformation being spewed in these threads.

                                                              only certain types of content are relevant to 2257, go read the law.

                                                              and if you can't read get out of the biz.
                                                              other matter that contains one or more visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct made after November 1, 1990
                                                              um...a banner ad has depictions of sexual conduct

                                                              Comment

                                                              • 80smetal
                                                                Registered User
                                                                • Jun 2004
                                                                • 505

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by JaceXXX
                                                                um...a banner ad has depictions of sexual conduct
                                                                tons and tons of banners do NOT show sexually explicit content. Pff I use text links anyway with better ctr.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Jace
                                                                  FBOP Class Of 2013
                                                                  • Jan 2004
                                                                  • 35562

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by 80smetal
                                                                  tons and tons of banners do NOT show sexually explicit content. Pff I use text links anyway with better ctr.
                                                                  oh no shit, really? but that isn't what we are talking about is it? we are talking about things that affected by the new 2257, and things that don't have sexually explicit content on them aren't in this convo

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • 80smetal
                                                                    Registered User
                                                                    • Jun 2004
                                                                    • 505

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by JaceXXX


                                                                    basically, if you run a server and have naked images on the server for the people to view, you have to have full 2257 docs on that model...and each pic has to be cross referenced in a database

                                                                    this includes banner ads, pics, videos, etc....ANY naked picture must have documentation to go with it
                                                                    explain this comment then, its so wrong its not even funny, what does naked have to do with 2257? Naked in no way means sexually explicit by definition

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Yngwie
                                                                      I am an Alien from space
                                                                      • May 2003
                                                                      • 11118

                                                                      #35
                                                                      would pics of a chick masturbating be deemed EXPLICIT?

                                                                      a naked chick posing normally?

                                                                      or is it only for actual hardcore sex (blowjobs, fucking and all that shit)

                                                                      I need to be 100% sure on all of this.
                                                                      ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Yngwie
                                                                        I am an Alien from space
                                                                        • May 2003
                                                                        • 11118

                                                                        #36
                                                                        I'm guessing that yes, it's deemed explicit but as I said, I want to be 100% sure
                                                                        ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • NoCarrier
                                                                          We need more free porn
                                                                          • Mar 2002
                                                                          • 16356

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by Yngwie
                                                                          would pics of a chick masturbating be deemed EXPLICIT?

                                                                          a naked chick posing normally?

                                                                          or is it only for actual hardcore sex (blowjobs, fucking and all that shit)

                                                                          I need to be 100% sure on all of this.
                                                                          SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONDUCT - Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Yngwie
                                                                            I am an Alien from space
                                                                            • May 2003
                                                                            • 11118

                                                                            #38
                                                                            yes, I read that but wanted to be 100% sure.
                                                                            ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Aquarius
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • May 2004
                                                                              • 4754

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by Project-Shadow
                                                                              Ok I actually have a serious question.
                                                                              Do these rules apply to residents of the U.S only?

                                                                              I reside in the U.K, but as far as I know my hosts are inside the U.S would this make me exempt from this law, or would I have to make all my sites 2257 complient?

                                                                              Fucking pain in the ass this is.
                                                                              I was wondering the same thing.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • Project-Shadow
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Feb 2003
                                                                                • 7340

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Well to semi-answer my own question.

                                                                                http://www.adultwebmasters.co.uk/cha...d=1&post=17863

                                                                                It seems a bit iffy though.. e.g.

                                                                                You have a Brit girls site, but host it in the U.S, the only identification that would be acceptable is from what i've read is an ID card... something that only U.S citizens are issued with.

                                                                                Maybe I need to phone asskroft and ask him myself. -_-''

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • DrewKole
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Jul 2001
                                                                                  • 5193

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by JaceXXX
                                                                                  yeah, that was wierd

                                                                                  i went to quote him and it was gone by the time I had the chance
                                                                                  Sorry it was me... Im mad lazy =)

                                                                                  Plus you gave the jist of it in your post, minus the playa comments about Aaron.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • jonesy
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Jan 2003
                                                                                    • 6688

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by TheJimmy
                                                                                    pretty clear to me that it means

                                                                                    tits ok (unless the titty bearer is wacking it)
                                                                                    no. tits not ok.
                                                                                    .
                                                                                    Shooting Bikini Girls

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • jonesy
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Jan 2003
                                                                                      • 6688

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by Project-Shadow
                                                                                      Well to semi-answer my own question.

                                                                                      http://www.adultwebmasters.co.uk/cha...d=1&post=17863

                                                                                      It seems a bit iffy though.. e.g.

                                                                                      You have a Brit girls site, but host it in the U.S, the only identification that would be acceptable is from what i've read is an ID card... something that only U.S citizens are issued with.

                                                                                      Maybe I need to phone asskroft and ask him myself. -_-''
                                                                                      Sec. 75.1 Definitions.

                                                                                      b) Picture identification card means a document issued by the
                                                                                      United States, a State government or a political subdivision thereof, or a United States territory that bears the photograph and the name of the individual identified, and provides sufficient specific information that it can be accessed from the issuing authority, e.g., a passport issued by the United States or a foreign country, driver's license issued by a State or the District of Columbia, or identification card issued by a State or the District of Columbia.
                                                                                      .
                                                                                      Shooting Bikini Girls

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • iwantchixx
                                                                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                        • Oct 2002
                                                                                        • 12860

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        I'm still smoking mad about having to show my home address where myself, my girlfirnd and our soon to be born baby reside. This is NOT safe practice.

                                                                                        I wonder if a person could use a c/o address? Or we should band together as local as possible and pay a piss poor price to rent some piss poor rat infested office somewhere for shit like this.

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Project-Shadow
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Feb 2003
                                                                                          • 7340

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by jonesy
                                                                                          Sec. 75.1 Definitions.

                                                                                          b) Picture identification card means a document issued by the
                                                                                          United States, a State government or a political subdivision thereof, or a United States territory that bears the photograph and the name of the individual identified, and provides sufficient specific information that it can be accessed from the issuing authority, e.g., a passport issued by the United States or a foreign country, driver's license issued by a State or the District of Columbia, or identification card issued by a State or the District of Columbia.
                                                                                          Cheers...
                                                                                          But how many people honestly take scans of a passport?
                                                                                          I know if I shot my own content I wouldnt be scanning passports... This law is retarded -_-'

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • KRL
                                                                                            Entrepreneur
                                                                                            • Oct 2002
                                                                                            • 31429

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            I love all these people on this board giving legal advice who aren't attorneys.

                                                                                            If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
                                                                                            from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!

                                                                                            *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
                                                                                            Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • KRL
                                                                                              Entrepreneur
                                                                                              • Oct 2002
                                                                                              • 31429

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by iwantchixx
                                                                                              I can never wrap my head around legal jargon, fuckign talking in circles is all they do with ref to this ref to that and ref back to something I read 10 mins ago that is contradicting to itself.
                                                                                              This is why we have attorneys.

                                                                                              This is why attorneys write the laws so you won't be able to understand them in plain english and will have to pay them to explain it to you for $300 an hour.

                                                                                              This is why lawyers like becoming politicians so they can write more laws for their law firms to confuse the legal system with and make money from.

                                                                                              This is why lobbyists who are usually lawyers too are paid by other lawyers to get more laws passed that nobody will understand except the lawyers.

                                                                                              This is why our country's legal system is so fucked up, because the lawyers have injected so many conflicting and deliberately confusing laws into the system that now they don't even know what the law is any more.

                                                                                              Welcome to the legal system, you may enter the maze here, there is no exit, only loopholes to sneak your way out. Good luck and bring your checkbook with you.

                                                                                              Last edited by KRL; 07-25-2004, 08:55 AM.
                                                                                              If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
                                                                                              from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!

                                                                                              *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
                                                                                              Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • iwantchixx
                                                                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                • Oct 2002
                                                                                                • 12860

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by KRL
                                                                                                This is why we have attorneys.

                                                                                                This is why attorneys write the laws so you won't be able to understand them in plain english and will have to pay them to explain it to you for $300 an hour.

                                                                                                This is why lawyers like becoming politicians so they can write more laws for their law firms to confuse the legal system with and make money from.

                                                                                                This is why lobbyists who are usually lawyers too are paid by other lawyers to get more laws passed that nobody will understand except the lawyers.

                                                                                                This is why our country's legal system is so fucked up, because the lawyers have injected so many conflicting and deliberately confusing laws into the system that now they don't even know what the law is any more.

                                                                                                Welcome to the legal system, you may enter the maze here, there is no exit, only loopholes to sneak your way out. Good luck and bring your checkbook with you.


                                                                                                Holy fuck, so true haha

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • xxxjay
                                                                                                  Tube groupie.
                                                                                                  • Aug 2002
                                                                                                  • 13482

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Originally posted by KRL
                                                                                                  I love all these people on this board giving legal advice who aren't attorneys.

                                                                                                  I've spoken with three decent lawyers that specialize in internet law and 2257 and their answers are as varied as what the non-lawyers have said in this thread.
                                                                                                  http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  Working...