View Single Post
Old 06-01-2005, 06:15 PM  
jonesy
Confirmed User
 
jonesy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio
I wouldn't go that far. It's still an image that can be accessed on the internet that shows explicit content. I would think that no matter if it's tangible or not, it still must have docs if you are going to display it freely.
a designer is not a purveyor of porn.

im not disagreeing with you that designers may fall under 2257 but i agree with this part of lady mischiefs post

designers would fall into the same category as film processors etc.. we are providing a service, but we don't profit off the final product aside from the fee for our services

so by your estimation, any website wether adult or not, that has a porn pic must have a 2257?


2 questions for you nick

what industry is 2257 intended for and who do you think the goverment is going to look at first in regards to violations?

sure as fuck isnt gonna be a website designer.
__________________
.
Shooting Bikini Girls

Last edited by jonesy; 06-01-2005 at 06:17 PM..
jonesy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote