I'm sick of you ignorant fuckers and your 2257 questions.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • freeadultcontent
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2002
    • 9976

    #51
    Originally posted by AaronM
    If people would read the proposed regulations then they would not have to ask most of these questions. It's not my fault if their reading comprehension is so low that they are not able to grasp what is being said. If that is the case then perhaps they would be better off working the mop bucket at the mall instead of pushing porn on the web.
    Que sera sera

    Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

    Comment

    • Praguer
      Confirmed User
      • Dec 2002
      • 991

      #52
      "....Then we have the little matter of record keeping and this is where it really impacts on individual webmasters. Webmasters will be expected to keep a record of each photo used and a note of the URL that it appears on and that will have to be cross referenced with a list of the names of the models that appear on each website.

      Failure to keep accurate records is punishable by imprisonment."

      High Quality-High Definition Adult Content
      ICQ: 348740763

      Comment

      • Praguer
        Confirmed User
        • Dec 2002
        • 991

        #53
        "......Of course there are those who are saying that none of this will ever pass through Congress but they forget one major thing. These changes are being made to regulations and they don?t need to be passed by Congress"

        High Quality-High Definition Adult Content
        ICQ: 348740763

        Comment

        • AaronM
          GFY Royality ;)
          • Oct 2001
          • 46917

          #54
          Originally posted by Praguer
          "....Then we have the little matter of record keeping and this is where it really impacts on individual webmasters. Webmasters will be expected to keep a record of each photo used and a note of the URL that it appears on and that will have to be cross referenced with a list of the names of the models that appear on each website.

          Failure to keep accurate records is punishable by imprisonment."
          Originally posted by Praguer
          "......Of course there are those who are saying that none of this will ever pass through Congress but they forget one major thing. These changes are being made to regulations and they don?t need to be passed by Congress"

          Comment

          • boobmaster
            So Fucking Banned
            • Jul 2003
            • 6185

            #55
            Originally posted by Praguer
            "....Then we have the little matter of record keeping and this is where it really impacts on individual webmasters. Webmasters will be expected to keep a record of each photo used and a note of the URL that it appears on and that will have to be cross referenced with a list of the names of the models that appear on each website.

            Failure to keep accurate records is punishable by imprisonment."
            Each PHOTO? ...... and for not doing this they can put you in jail?

            There is already a HUGE overcrowding problem in US prisions. They let killers out before they serve their full sentences because of overcrowding. How are they gonna make room for people who forget to include a photo of some naked check in their 2257 records?

            Comment

            • baddog
              So Fucking Banned
              • Apr 2001
              • 107089

              #56
              Originally posted by CamChicks


              The law should be clear. The rules should be clear.
              have you ever read a law?

              Comment

              • jayeff
                Confirmed User
                • May 2001
                • 2944

                #57
                Originally posted by AaronM
                Hire a fucking Adult Internet Attorney or get the fuck out of this industry NOW!

                All your bullshit posts and inaccurate info are really starting to piss me right the fuck off.

                If your attorney does not belong to the First Amendment Lawyers Association then it's time to find an attorney or law firm that is.

                I wouldn't expect anything but excellent advice from one of the pillars of our industry. Over the next few months, hundreds of smart webmasters will each pay lawyers to ask them the exact same questions about 2257.

                "It will depend on case law. That will be $500."

                And those are the smart webmasters...

                Comment

                Working...