Check out www.RealityCheckNetwork.com for Netherlands based fully managed hosting solutions -- ICQ me for more info
Reality Check Network Corp.
1213 Ave Z Suite #D38
Brooklyn, NY 11235
What exactly does Netherlands based mean? Will servers physically be in Nl? Is the company legally a Dutch one? Are the corporate offices in the Netherlands?
Reality Check Network Corp.
1213 Ave Z Suite #D38
Brooklyn, NY 11235
What exactly does Netherlands based mean? Will servers physically be in Nl? Is the company legally a Dutch one? Are the corporate offices in the Netherlands?
We have a second data center in the Netherlands, and yes our current data center is in NY. Reality Check Network is registered in NY, and we are contemplating opening a European based company to manage the assets in NL, however since most laws govern webmasters and not hosts it would seem that a US held hosting company based in the Netherlands should suffice.
Yes, chilihost has just setup a full offshore hosting solution running out of Amsterdam. We have signed up with an established, quality data center in the Netherlands who have been online since 1997 and maintain a 99.99% availability.
We are offering fully managed, maintained and monitored dedicated servers for about the same price as US-based servers. Check out our new website http://www.chilihost.nl to see what we offer, or if you need larger servers or more bandwidth then email us on [email protected] and I will provide a custom quote.
What are your bandwidth requirements? and what are you looking at from an offshore host, ie what are you planning to do on the server.
This is important as I guess you're moving the servers abroad for legal or tax reasons and there are alot of differing laws regarding content/whether a server constitutes a taxable prescense in the host country/etc.
with what im readiong on 2257 i dont think its going to make a fifference where its hosted i have my lawyers reading it int deeper but have a look at this
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=8941
=
seems like you will not be safe anywhere give it a month or so and we'll see how more accurately how the new 2257 regs will play out
i dont see how hosting offshore would hosting would make a difference, if you're a us resident then you're a bound by US laws regardless of where you have your stuff hosted at, for example elitetorrents was hosted in the netherlands and the feds had no problem confiscating the server even though it was in NL
i dont see how hosting offshore would hosting would make a difference, if you're a us resident then you're a bound by US laws regardless of where you have your stuff hosted at, for example elitetorrents was hosted in the netherlands and the feds had no problem confiscating the server even though it was in NL
with what im readiong on 2257 i dont think its going to make a fifference where its hosted i have my lawyers reading it int deeper but have a look at this
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=8941
=
seems like you will not be safe anywhere give it a month or so and we'll see how more accurately how the new 2257 regs will play out
what exactly does the Patriot Act have to do with 2257?
i dont see how hosting offshore would hosting would make a difference, if you're a us resident then you're a bound by US laws regardless of where you have your stuff hosted at, for example elitetorrents was hosted in the netherlands and the feds had no problem confiscating the server even though it was in NL
Dunno about the owners/operators of elitetorrents, but that domain was not "confiscated" by any officer of the US Govt. They have no legal authority in the Netherlands to do this. The domain was terminated because it violated the laws of Holland.
read the article posted link, then if you really ask again, you are not in the adult biz ( maybe just the pills biz )....
an article about the Patriot Act and ISP's turning information over to investigative agencies under its authority has nothing to do with 2257 as they are unrelated completely.
not only that... you fucking twit, but had you read the article at all you would know that the government was unsuccessful in making this happen as the courts have barred them from obtaining such info in this manner.
an article about the Patriot Act and ISP's turning information over to investigative agencies under its authority has nothing to do with 2257 as they are unrelated completely.
not only that... you fucking twit, but had you read the article at all you would know that the government was unsuccessful in making this happen as the courts have barred them from obtaining such info in this manner.
You are right... USA RULES...
Please leave all your servers there... There is no way that the gov could ask your ISP for info...or if so, you would be informed ... or at least the gov will need a warrant ... and never would they seize and unplug the box ... how in hell could they explain that ... We unplugged the server of a suspected child abuser and ppossibily a terrorist ....
I will not resort to your low defense of name calling ... continue to walk your eyes closed .,.
and if you ar eable to comprehend the first 2 paragraphs:
WASHINGTON ? The Bush Administration on Friday filed a motion in federal appeals court seeking the power to force Internet service providers to hand over information on customers ? and barring them from telling customers they have done so.
Under the U.S. Patriot Act of 2001, investigative agencies were granted the ability to secretly demand customer data records from ISPs.
They were turned down... but you should know they wont take that as an answer ....
Last edited by directfiesta; 05-31-2005, 07:33 PM.
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Again,... the Patriot Act and 2257 have nothing to do with each other. The courts already ruled against them and they are appealing the decision. Nothing abnormal about that... its how the legal system works. Its funny in a typically you and mildy retarded way, that you use an arguement that shows the legal system and system of checks and balances working perfectly to prove they are both broken.
Even in your deluded state of mind where you been apparently been reduced to nothing more than repetitive, unrelenting and persistent "i hate the USA", "i hate Bush" ranting, you should be able to understand that CP, Porn, 2257 and Terrorism have nothing to do with each other.
Again,... the Patriot Act and 2257 have nothing to do with each other. The courts already ruled against them and they are appealing the decision. Nothing abnormal about that... its how the legal system works. Its funny in a typically you and mildy retarded way, that you use an arguement that shows the legal system and system of checks and balances working perfectly to prove they are both broken.
Even in your deluded state of mind where you been apparently been reduced to nothing more than repetitive, unrelenting and persistent "i hate the USA", "i hate Bush" ranting, you should be able to understand that CP, Porn, 2257 and Terrorism have nothing to do with each other.
Mmmm... Yes, you are correct, they are two different acts, one is called USC 2257 and the other the "Patriot Act" and both are pieces of legislation instigated for enforcement within US jurisdiction.
I think what df is saying is that both these acts, plus a load of other stuff where DNA samples and documentation are required - don't make it a raving appeal to operate a business within US territory, - especially a business which is adult in nature.
Right now... apart from around six countries in the world, the US is now the most unappealing location for the operation of a web biz in the adult field. That has nothing to do with your stuff about "US hating" (cos I don't!) - it's just a fact of life.
Comment