Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GatorB
Because stalkers don't have jobs where they can come into contact with women personal info ????Hmmmmm. You'd think those be the very type of jobs they'd get.
I'm tired of this "You're a pornographer so your're a stalker" crap. A model is 10,000 times more likely to get stalked by some dude working at McDonald's than pornographer.
|
Hear what you are saying Gator and ya got a point!
But.. consider this, you got a friend who happens to be a model and she did a shoot sometime last year and where the usual photo ID and model release was signed.
Then... unknown to her, and contrary to any "normal" model release terms, some producer (current holder of rights), sends out her home address to anyone that needs it.
Personally... if I were a model and I ended up with some perv hounding me and found out it he established my home address via 2257 docs - there would be several court cases. Not only for the webmaster, but all up that tree and applications for destruction of all content which was, in effect, distributed contrary to the terms originally established.
If you think you would treat a friend that way, that's fine. But no friggin way am I gonna be releasing model's home addresses to anyone - nevermind any asshole "just doing his job" from the US govt.