Designers and 2257 - Does it apply to you? - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

jonesy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 6688
Share

Post
#1

Designers and 2257 - Does it apply to you?

05-31-2005, 01:18 PM

web designers, template/tgp/gallery designers, graphic designers, ect

wether youre

in house

free lance

outsource

design firm

do you think 2257 applies to you?

.
Shooting Bikini Girls
Tags: None
who

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 19593
Share

Post
#2

05-31-2005, 01:20 PM

but why>?
Comment
pornpf69

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 15782
Share

Post
#3

05-31-2005, 01:22 PM

I dont get the question...

Delight Toys Store!
Cumming Sooooon
MY ICQ# 169833797
Comment
BlueWire

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 4628
Share

Post
#4

05-31-2005, 01:23 PM

I believe the question is...if we use pics within our design...are we responsible, or is the customer responsible?
Comment
machinegunkelly

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 3304
Share

Post
#5

05-31-2005, 01:25 PM

The more I read , the more I think yes ,
I didn't think it would apply to me at first so I never really paid attention ,

The way I see it basically if you have the images up , you need the papers ...

Lucky for me I'm in canada so I'll just be changing some hosting around and everything should be cool for now

dead.
Comment
machinegunkelly

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 3304
Share

Post
#6

05-31-2005, 01:25 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

I believe the question is...if we use pics within our design...are we responsible, or is the customer responsible?

I think he may mean posting the work in your portfolio ?

dead.
Comment
GatorB

The Demon & 12clicks

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 18208
Share

Post
#7

05-31-2005, 01:27 PM

Originally posted by jonesy

web designers, template/tgp/gallery designers, graphic designers, ect

wether youre

in house

free lance

outsource

design firm

do you think 2257 applies to you?

read the regs.
Comment
jonesy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 6688
Share

Post
#8

05-31-2005, 01:30 PM

a company hires you to design and build one or all of the following

1 - a website, full tour and members area

2 - a tgp

3 - a movie gallery

your given content

you render content for the website and deliver the product

you sometimes upload it

do you as a designer fall under the laws of 2257?

Last edited by jonesy; 05-31-2005, 01:32 PM.

.
Shooting Bikini Girls
Comment
GoodStuff

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 511
Share

Post
#9

05-31-2005, 01:36 PM

As long as it is on our servers, yes.
Comment
jonesy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 6688
Share

Post
#10

05-31-2005, 05:24 PM

Originally posted by GoodStuff

As long as it is on our servers, yes.

........?

.
Shooting Bikini Girls
Comment
buboy

Registered User

Join Date: May 2005

Posts: 18
Share

Post
#11

06-01-2005, 05:08 AM

Originally posted by jonesy

web designers, template/tgp/gallery designers, graphic designers, ect

wether youre

in house

free lance

outsource

design firm

do you think 2257 applies to you?

Just Have An Idea...regarding 2257 and its about child protection against exploitation...bu havent read the whole article...any link...thanks
Comment
Roald

SecretFriends.com

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 27910
Share

Post
#12

06-01-2005, 05:24 AM

As far as I heard yes it does apply for us designers in some cases.

WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME

ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT

Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr
Comment
NickPapageorgio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 8323
Share

Post
#13

06-01-2005, 05:33 AM

The only way I would think it applies to me is if I have explicit samples listed on my portfolio site. Otherwise, as long as the content that I am building the site/creative with is owned by the client, I can't see where I am responsible for it at all. Now, if I am going to show that design in my portfolio online, then it's another story. That's how I would see that.
Comment
Roald

SecretFriends.com

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 27910
Share

Post
#14

06-01-2005, 05:33 AM

Originally posted by NickPapageorgio

....Now, if I am going to show that design in my portfolio online, then it's another story. That's how I would see that.

Thats the point of this thread I think.

WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME

ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT

Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr
Comment
WebTitan

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 5114
Share

Post
#15

06-01-2005, 05:47 AM

Originally posted by NickPapageorgio

The only way I would think it applies to me is if I have explicit samples listed on my portfolio site. Otherwise, as long as the content that I am building the site/creative with is owned by the client, I can't see where I am responsible for it at all. Now, if I am going to show that design in my portfolio online, then it's another story. That's how I would see that.

this is how i read it myself
Comment
Audrey

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 343
Share

Post
#16

06-01-2005, 06:06 AM

I'm hosting in canada

Cash Prog. & Solo Sites : Lemonade Cash Cali Logan
Niche Sites : Kickass-Girlz KnockoutGirlz
Content: 66clicks
Comment
s9ann0

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2001

Posts: 4873
Share

Post
#17

06-01-2005, 06:15 AM

2257 is the end of adult internet design!
Comment
jacked

sperm tail

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 11019
Share

Post
#18

06-01-2005, 06:28 AM

i can see where this can be a problem especially with our portfolios because 9 out of 10 times their is a few nude images built into the design, and it's just as accessible to anyone who wanted to view it.

i'm guessing were gonna get fucked into having to keep all the documents for the content we incorporate into the designs

Got Cam Models?
icq: 361-607-616
Comment
Roald

SecretFriends.com

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 27910
Share

Post
#19

06-01-2005, 06:33 AM

Originally posted by jacked

i can see where this can be a problem especially with our portfolios because 9 out of 10 times their is a few nude images built into the design, and it's just as accessible to anyone who wanted to view it.

i'm guessing were gonna get fucked into having to keep all the documents for the content we incorporate into the designs

just take down the portfolio

WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME

ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT

Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr
Comment
LadyMischief

Orgasms N Such!

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 18135
Share

Post
#20

06-01-2005, 06:47 AM

Actually if you read the regulations closely, designers would fall into the same category as film processors etc.. we are providing a service, but we don't profit off the final product aside from the fee for our services.. The only time it would be applicable is for the content in our portfolios

ICQ 3522039
Content Manager - orgasm.com
[email protected]
Comment
LadyMischief

Orgasms N Such!

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 18135
Share

Post
#21

06-01-2005, 06:48 AM

Originally posted by Audrey

I'm hosting in canada

How the hell does that change anything?>

ICQ 3522039
Content Manager - orgasm.com
[email protected]
Comment
Platinumpimp

Logos and such.

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 10214
Share

Post
#22

06-01-2005, 06:53 AM

Most of the work I do are vectors and custom drawn by me.

I design logo's.
Comment
Platinumpimp

Logos and such.

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 10214
Share

Post
#23

06-01-2005, 06:54 AM

Originally posted by QuaShe

just take down the portfolio

LOL

I design logo's.
Comment
jonesy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 6688
Share

Post
#24

06-01-2005, 04:17 PM

Originally posted by LadyMischief

Actually if you read the regulations closely, designers would fall into the same category as film processors etc.. we are providing a service, but we don't profit off the final product aside from the fee for our services.. The only time it would be applicable is for the content in our portfolios

agreed

i would even doubt that 2257 would apply to an artists portfolio because the images in the portfolio arent for sale as a tangible item, ie a book video ect - just an example of a designers skills.

but thats not to say its not worth getting a professional opinion either.

Last edited by jonesy; 06-01-2005, 04:19 PM.

.
Shooting Bikini Girls
Comment
NickPapageorgio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 8323
Share

Post
#25

06-01-2005, 04:20 PM

Originally posted by jonesy

agreed

i would even doubt that 2257 would apply to an artists portfolio because the images in the portfolio arent for sale as a tangible item, ie a book video ect - just an example of a designers skills.

but thats not to say its not worth getting a professional opinion either.

I wouldn't go that far. It's still an image that can be accessed on the internet that shows explicit content. I would think that no matter if it's tangible or not, it still must have docs if you are going to display it freely.
Comment
zentz

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 8062
Share

Post
#26

06-01-2005, 04:24 PM

2257 sucks

Programs that owe me money ---- Epassporte.com ~ $2700 | Protraffic.com ~ $2600 | XonDemand.com ~ $3000

Email: [email protected]
Comment
jonesy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 6688
Share

Post
#27

06-01-2005, 05:15 PM

Originally posted by NickPapageorgio

I wouldn't go that far. It's still an image that can be accessed on the internet that shows explicit content. I would think that no matter if it's tangible or not, it still must have docs if you are going to display it freely.

a designer is not a purveyor of porn.

im not disagreeing with you that designers may fall under 2257 but i agree with this part of lady mischiefs post

designers would fall into the same category as film processors etc.. we are providing a service, but we don't profit off the final product aside from the fee for our services

so by your estimation, any website wether adult or not, that has a porn pic must have a 2257?

2 questions for you nick

what industry is 2257 intended for and who do you think the goverment is going to look at first in regards to violations?

sure as fuck isnt gonna be a website designer.

Last edited by jonesy; 06-01-2005, 05:17 PM.

.
Shooting Bikini Girls
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...