Will 2257 Kill all US based Voyeur sites?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Machete_
    WINNING!
    • Oct 2002
    • 14579
    #1

    Will 2257 Kill all US based Voyeur sites?

    ..what will you do? Sneak a Picture on you cam, and then ask ""uhhhmm.. can I get you name, cause I need to post this on my site"
    Tags: None
    • AaronM
      GFY Royality ;)
      • Oct 2001
      • 46923
      #2
      Originally posted by ebus_dk
      ..what will you do? Sneak a Picture on you cam, and then ask ""uhhhmm.. can I get you name, cause I need to post this on my site"

      This is why people who don't know shit about 2257 should not post about 2257.

      This is also why I have been ignoring most 2257 threads over the last few days.

        Comment

        • Machete_
          WINNING!
          • Oct 2002
          • 14579
          #3
          if I knew shit about 2257, would I then ask?

            Comment

            • fireorange
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2005
              • 1648
              #4
              Originally posted by ebus_dk
              if I knew shit about 2257, would I then ask?

                Comment

                • Terenzo
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2002
                  • 971
                  #5
                  hahaha!!
                  Signature Spot - USD 5000 / month

                    Comment

                    • AaronM
                      GFY Royality ;)
                      • Oct 2001
                      • 46923
                      #6
                      Originally posted by ebus_dk
                      if I knew shit about 2257, would I then ask?

                      This tells me that you are not compliant with 2257 now... Why would you care about it in the future?

                      "Sneak a Picture on you cam, and then ask ""uhhhmm.. can I get you name, cause I need to post this on my site""

                      Your question is worded as if it is addressing the new regulations....BUT...This scenario is not an issue with either the present or the new laws.

                        Comment

                        • xxxice
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2002
                          • 5042
                          #7
                          Meeting with attorney scheduled

                            Comment

                            • Machete_
                              WINNING!
                              • Oct 2002
                              • 14579
                              #8
                              Originally posted by AaronM
                              This tells me that you are not compliant with 2257 now... Why would you care about it in the future?

                              "Sneak a Picture on you cam, and then ask ""uhhhmm.. can I get you name, cause I need to post this on my site""

                              Your question is worded as if it is addressing the new regulations....BUT...This scenario is not an issue with either the present or the new laws.
                              .. so in other words, the answer to my question would be "no"?

                              It is correct that im not compliant with 2257.
                              The reason is that I ONLY build danish sites, hosted in danmark, marketed in denmark and sweden... So why would I be interrested?
                              My legal advisor told me not to waste my time with that issus, since it dont cover my area...

                                Comment

                                • crockett
                                  in a van by the river
                                  • May 2003
                                  • 76818
                                  #9
                                  Originally posted by ebus_dk
                                  ..what will you do? Sneak a Picture on you cam, and then ask ""uhhhmm.. can I get you name, cause I need to post this on my site"

                                  ummm no but the 2004 Anti Voyeurism Law did.. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133144,00.html well at least it made it illegal on federal lands.
                                  In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                    Comment

                                    • Violetta
                                      Affiliate
                                      • Jul 2004
                                      • 28735
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by AaronM
                                      This is why people who don't know shit about 2257 should not post about 2257.

                                      This is also why I have been ignoring most 2257 threads over the last few days.
                                      do you always have a bad day or what?
                                      M&A Queen

                                        Comment

                                        • PantieZ
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jan 2001
                                          • 1441
                                          #11
                                          Originally posted by AaronM
                                          This is why people who don't know shit about 2257 should not post about 2257.

                                          This is also why I have been ignoring most 2257 threads over the last few days.
                                          why do you reply then ??

                                            Comment

                                            • mardigras
                                              Bon temps!
                                              • Feb 2003
                                              • 14194
                                              #12
                                              Depends on what you call a voyer site. Hidden cams and real unaware "upskirts" are illegal anyway. Footage of public nudity in a large gathering, I.E. spring break (or Mardi Gras ) has been ruled in the cases brought so far as reporting or documenting a public event. The cases that have been lost so far are those that used a single person in promotion (ie, box covers) without their permission. I'm not a lawyer so my opinion should not be taken as any legal advice. If you run such sites I wouldn't recommend posting anyone who looks questionable.
                                              .

                                                Comment

                                                • s9ann0
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Sep 2001
                                                  • 4873
                                                  #13
                                                  2257 will end the entire adult internet forever!

                                                    Comment

                                                    • PantieZ
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Jan 2001
                                                      • 1441
                                                      #14
                                                      Originally posted by spanno
                                                      2257 will end the entire adult internet forever!
                                                      Internet is not USA ...

                                                        Comment

                                                        Previous template Next
                                                        Working...