50% stock loss
Acacia stock down over 50% now.
Collapse
X
-
Lol, Hell yeah!Originally posted by Dagwolf
One greedy lawsuit-happy corporation down... One extremist right-wing government administration to go.
Comment
-
I'm not saying that I am taking credit for the latest plunge, but just after the Forbes article was released (http://www.forbes.com/enterprisetech...720acacia.html) where Berman, General Counsel for the publically traded Acacia company, singled my out to take a potshot, the stock took a nose dive.Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
it's looking better,day after day
It gave me the opportunity fire away with comments on my website and the yahoo board.
I guess I must be agitating them with the truth.
Fight the Spin!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
Great press Brandon!
Is Lensman's pleadings aginast Acacia available online? Would be interested in reading them.
When Lens owns Acacia. then P1mpdog will have to send his *$300* a month to adult.com...Comment
-
it's sad when a companies only purpose is to buy unused patents and try to sue in order to make money. The patent office made a huge mistake when they decided to allow people the ability to patent an idea.Originally posted by candyflip
They still haven't learned their lesson though. They just acquired yet ANOTHER patent to try and license.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040721/215181_1.html
Patent's IMO should only be given to something that is useable, or if it's for an Idea then it should have a very limited life. If the idea is not used then the patent should be killed within a certian amount of time like say 5 years.In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.Comment
-
Oh those mother fuckers! Acacia and Lodgenet conspiring...
As I recall Lodgenet was one of the first to settle the other patent in question.Comment
-
Time for me to place another short sale on them. Thanks for the heads up Lensman!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lensman
It dipped below $3 yesterday, down over 50% from last week!
And their market cap is currently 60M, and I know they had over $50 Million in cash. So it seems the stock is close to LIQUIDATION value.
What's gonna happen to stockholders when I win my countersuit against them?
Let's hope you win your Counter before they go broke, so they can Pay you!Comment
-
Oh I wish that would happen!Originally posted by pussyluver
When Lens owns Acacia. then P1mpdog will have to send his *$300* a month to adult.com...
Comment
-
Originally posted by crockett
The patent office made a huge mistake when they decided to allow people the ability to patent an idea.
That is so true, it is obscene
It's not like before there were software patents you could go copy Excel and claim it is yours. There was the copyright law, and still is.
If there had been patents on software and concepts 15 years ago, we would be all writing on "Word" today and nothing else. (O.k. we actually do tehe)
You bet the concept of "moving words around and re-organizing them in a way that..." would be granted a healthy 20 patents & the nobel prize today.
Europe is doing the exact same thing. European parliament is strictly against patenting software, models and concepts, but the European Comissions who has the final say wants to push it through nonetheless
(Not) suprisingly, most politicans over here, especially the leftist ones, think that patents actually HELP the smaller companies and individual developers. At least they say so. But I fear they really believe it this time. I shit you not. They act like they're doing a good thing to help out the poor. Because, you can protect your work then, and the big evil companies cannot take it away from you anymore.
The fact that more rules ALWAYS help the rich is something they do not (want to) understand. The more rules, the more lawyers/money needed to enforce/defend them. Rules = ALWAYS good for the big guys.
But when reading interviews with the politicans pushing software patents (including Germany's chancellors Schroeder, who is all for it) they are always like: "uh, but if something wents wrong, you can always challenge the patent."
The main point here is most politican's interesting ignorance regarding the ASTRONOMICAL COSTS of patent law issues. Even a little trademark issue costs me $10,000 easily. Patent trouble is 2 leagues upstairs. Instead of just ONE single term, you need your lawyer to turn upside down 10,000's of words.
GO LENSMAN GO
Comment
-
Nice to know what your principles are.Originally posted by p1mpdogg
hope it happens.. that way we only wasted a few k and not 10's of thousands on a lawsuit
But you only win if the patent is made invalid in court, if Acaia pull out you continue to pay and showing your true colours has also hurt you in looking for affiliates. Let's face it who wants to sign up to someone who might give their information to Acacia?Comment
-
hey Brandon, definitely you are one of the main contributors to the fight against Acacia. Me along with the rest webmasters we owe you a big thank you for your time, money and resources you keep offering.Originally posted by FightThisPatent
I'm not saying that I am taking credit for the latest plunge, but just after the Forbes article was released (http://www.forbes.com/enterprisetech...720acacia.html) where Berman, General Counsel for the publically traded Acacia company, singled my out to take a potshot, the stock took a nose dive.
It gave me the opportunity fire away with comments on my website and the yahoo board.
I guess I must be agitating them with the truth.
Fight the Spin!Comment
-
I feel delighted for all those ***** who made "Wise business descisions" by paying cash to this bunch of scum...Comment
-
Oh but they will get a refund.....lolOriginally posted by HarlotCash Dyker
I feel delighted for all those ***** who made "Wise business descisions" by paying cash to this bunch of scum...We are what we repeatedly do.-AristotleComment
-
-
sometimes its best to cut your losses...Originally posted by pornguy
If you have stock in them, and you have already lost money because of the drop. DO NOT SELL.
Hold them and when the company goes out of business, or the stock is removed from trading you can us that as a write off for 100% loss of investment.Comment
-
Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
it's looking better,day after day
rssEVOLUTION : Produce a FULL website with ANY RSS feed(s) in seconds.
contentSOLUTION : Allowing you to automatically grab articles from article directories,
import as many text files as you want at once, grab ANY content from ANY RSS feed, and scrape search engines, instantly.Comment



Acacia ....



Comment