In US this is porn, but there is no 2257

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Sexzity
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2002
    • 1329
    #1

    In US this is porn, but there is no 2257

    http://www.spicyparis.com/paris.html
    How do i get her private info like homeadress and phone no

    Click play on the movie
    Tags: None
    • Adam-EB
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2004
      • 393
      #2
      You didn't read the new regs? Paris is exempt from any 2257 laws.
      SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

        Comment

        • Doc911
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2004
          • 3695
          #3
          How is that Porn?


          For PHP/MySQL scripts ICQ 161480555 or email [email protected]

            Comment

            • Nicky
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Mar 2003
              • 30071
              #4
              where is da porn??

              gfynicky @ gmail.com

                Comment

                • sumphatpimp
                  Confirmed User
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 5235
                  #5
                  has no fucking clue!

                    Comment

                    • Sexzity
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2002
                      • 1329
                      #6
                      Originally posted by Doc911
                      How is that Porn?
                      http://www.parentstv.org/

                        Comment

                        • Jaeger
                          Confirmed User
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 567
                          #7
                          its porn according to the new laws cause they would deem it "sexually explicit". Where is the 2257 for that!!!! ffs
                          been in this industry since 2002.. gettin' too old for this shit..

                            Comment

                            • AaronM
                              GFY Royality ;)
                              • Oct 2001
                              • 46917
                              #8
                              Originally posted by Jaeger
                              its porn according to the new laws cause they would deem it "sexually explicit". Where is the 2257 for that!!!! ffs

                              This is why you should send all your Paris traffic to www.xpays.com and avoid sites who do not have her 2257 docs.

                                Comment

                                • AaronM
                                  GFY Royality ;)
                                  • Oct 2001
                                  • 46917
                                  #9
                                  So I just watched that video for the first time.

                                  If anybody here seriously thinks that the DOJ considers that to be sexually explicit then you are smoking WAY too much crack.

                                    Comment

                                    • TheDoc
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • Jul 2001
                                      • 13827
                                      #10
                                      That is far from sexually explicit..

                                      Sexual, yes, but it shows no nudity of any kind so it isn't explicit.
                                      ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                                      It's all disambiguation

                                        Comment

                                        • mardigras
                                          Bon temps!
                                          • Feb 2003
                                          • 14194
                                          #11
                                          Just because the site says it is too hot for TV doesn't mean it couldn't run on TV
                                          .

                                            Comment

                                            • Doc911
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Feb 2004
                                              • 3695
                                              #12
                                              no where did I see I cock shoved in her mouth. At no time was she jumping up and down on a penis. she's fully clothed and never pinched her nipples or fingered her snatch.

                                              Thats a fucking hamburger comercial. Its not Porn and needs no 2257


                                              For PHP/MySQL scripts ICQ 161480555 or email [email protected]

                                                Comment

                                                • ytcracker
                                                  stc is the greatest
                                                  • Dec 2002
                                                  • 12403
                                                  #13
                                                  Originally posted by Doc911
                                                  no where did I see I cock shoved in her mouth.
                                                  i have a vivid imagination
                                                  www.ytcracker.com | www.digitalgangster.com
                                                  i love you

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Jaeger
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Sep 2003
                                                      • 567
                                                      #14
                                                      you guys miss the point... it *could* be considered sexually explicit, depending on a judge's descretion, under 2257, im trying to point out how fucked 2257 could be.
                                                      been in this industry since 2002.. gettin' too old for this shit..

                                                        Comment

                                                        • reynold
                                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                          • Oct 2002
                                                          • 51271
                                                          #15
                                                          Fuck this adulterated and contaminated government who's trying to play clean!

                                                            Comment

                                                            Previous template Next
                                                            Working...