In the UK I dont think you would be allowed to give out personal details of 'staff' home addresses etc. Technically the performers are freelance staff.
-
-
see that is the issue, good point -
I can see the headlines now
"Porn star murdered by obssessive fan"
Then everyone in the country knows their info will be available on the web if they pose for porn, just like the big "A" stitched into their clothes for adulterer we all read about as children.
They hope it will make women think twice before posing in the united states.
2257 has a whole myriad of reasons for being in existence, & none of them have anything to do with protecting childrenComment
-
So then, after one is murdered, the govt comes in & says, ok, the info should only be available to the feds & the DOJ....so if you produce pornography, go ahead & sign up at "X" site, & provide us with a username & password.
Now they have a new registry of pornographers on hand so they can start other witchhunts, including their new favorite "obscenity"Comment
-
Then as far as I could tell according to the DOJ, you don't do business in or with the US.Comment
-
In Europe this would never have got past. It violates the data protection act in a manner that can endanger lives.
Comment
-
Hi Relish XXX... Yea.. little doubt it does!Originally posted by Relish XXX
Tho 2257 is not an act that is relevant to any non-US citizen and living outside the US or have servers within US territory.
Gotta be some changes of hosts going on soon!!
XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Seems that way doesnt it. The DOJ seems to be helping to fuck up the US economy just as well as George Bush!Originally posted by WebbyHi Relish XXX... Yea.. little doubt it does!
Tho 2257 is not an act that is relevant to any non-US citizen and living outside the US or have servers within US territory.
Gotta be some changes of hosts going on soon!!
Comment
-
I should open up a hosting company in Canada
Comment
-
seriously people dont' care about pornstars or pornographers, it's simple as that...
but let's hope those lawyers can kick a little ass in the courts, they've done it in the past, they can do it again....
.Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
yea.. just wait unrtil some hurts one of my girls.. it is lawsuit time.. even throw I know I am not going to get money out of it..Comment
-
Agree! It's getting harder to find stuff that is not a fuckup in some way :-)Originally posted by Relish XXX
This is gonna be fun if this act is enforced - we'll have the rest of the world purveying porn and the US sitting on some religeous shitpile trying to be righteous :-)
There are other implications.. not just 2257, where it smells like there is going to be a move to other countries - in fact, it has already started. Unless the EU does a similar screwup, - I think more activity will start there.
PS.. Don't really think this ammendment to 2257 has anything to do with the protection of children. They already have laws in place to cover that.Last edited by Webby; 05-24-2005, 10:29 PM.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
The DOJ directry address my question on this which I put forth during the Comment Period
One commenter also commented that the proposed rule may force
foreign primary producers to violate foreign laws regarding protection
of information. If primary producers in foreign countries decide to
comply with their home privacy laws and not provide materials to U.S.
entities, the regulation will chill the availability of materials and
speech to U.S. citizens. The Department declines to adopt this comment.
The rule is no different from other forms of labeling requirements
imposed on foreign producers of, e.g., alcohol, tobacco, or food items
that are imported into the United States. In order to sell in the U.S.
market, foreign producers must comply with U.S. laws. This rule applies
equally to any sexually explicit material introduced into the stream of
commerce in the United States no matter where it was produced. Foreign
producers have the option of not complying with the rule, but then
their access to the U.S. market is justly and lawfully prohibited.SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
That is an illustration as to how stupid this 2257 amendment is. Foreign producers, at least in the vast majority, already comply with their own country's laws as regards the protection of children and even this amendment does not enhance the protection of children.Originally posted by Imageauction
Insanity must be a disease in the air...XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
Comment