Does Anybody Actually Have A Definition Of 'Sexually Explicit Depiction'?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Mutt
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Sep 2002
    • 34431
    #1

    Does Anybody Actually Have A Definition Of 'Sexually Explicit Depiction'?

    Wouldn't it be helpful if the DOJ actually defined what 'sexually explicit' is before basing an incredibly burdensome legal requirement that could send people to jail on the term? You could ask 1000 people what 'sexually explicit' means and you'd get a ton of different opinions. To me it means intercourse, fellatio, cunnilingus, masturbation. It sure doesn't mean simple nudity to me or a bunch of other types of adult photography/videography. Simulated sexually explicit activity is exempt from 2257. If nobody knows exactly what sexually explicit is then there's no way to know what simulated
    sexually explicit is either.
    I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!
    Tags: None
    • After Shock Media
      It's coming look busy
      • Mar 2001
      • 35299
      #2
      Not you too mutt.
      TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 110 > ยง 2256

      For the purposes of this chapter, the term?
      (1) ?minor? means any person under the age of eighteen years;
      (2) ?sexually explicit conduct? means actual or simulated?
      (A) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
      (B) bestiality;
      (C) masturbation;
      (D) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
      (E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

      [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

        Comment

        • kernelpanic
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jan 2005
          • 2961
          #3
          Just do as Bush and his DOJ do, ask yourself: "Does Jesus approve"


          ZangoCash - Turn Your Traffic Into Ca$h.
          $.40 Per Install - No Tier

            Comment

            • Mutt
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Sep 2002
              • 34431
              #4
              hey - thanks. i knew it must be defined somewhere. now to read it.
              I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

                Comment

                • reynold
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 51271
                  #5
                  Any lawyers and knowledgeable ones out there?

                    Comment

                    • Mutt
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 34431
                      #6
                      um........... the sky really is falling. if this was the stock market I'd be long on NN, softcore single girl sites, softcore glamour, art nude sites.
                      I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

                        Comment

                        • slapass
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Nov 2002
                          • 14625
                          #7
                          Why does this make any sense? Minors cannot show tits on a porn site. So why is that one act not covered by the above definition? I am assuming the DOJ does not call tits, genitals.

                            Comment

                            Previous template Next
                            Working...