View Single Post
Old 05-19-2005, 04:53 PM  
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
Im not a lawyer, but in that case it makes sense that textlinking makes you an advertiser, but not publisher. If the model is 18+, and the sponsor is not fully 2257 compliant, the sponsor might risk punishment alone.
How is that any different than before the new 2257 rules?

If you advertise any illegal product or service (especially child porn) you can get in trouble. 2257 has nothing to do with that.
__________________
Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote