well?
-
41FAT320%2NTFS0%39 -
NTFS is much better then fat32 since ntfs is the New Technology file system that Microsoft have developed it is faster, has much more security features and allows to apply security settings per file which is not possible on fat32.
TrafficCashGold Paying Webmasters Since 1996!
Awesome Conversions! Fast Weekly Payments! Over 125 Tours! -
absolutely agree.. NTFS da rulezOriginally posted by Adultnet
NTFS is much better then fat32 since ntfs is the New Technology file system that Microsoft have developed it is faster, has much more security features and allows to apply security settings per file which is not possible on fat32.Comment
-
Last time I installed my XP I did Fat32 and my PC ran like utter shit after a few weeks ,
NTFS seems more stable on this install .Comment
-
NTFS is much more stable then fat anyways if you have windows xp and want to convert a hard drive from ntfs to fat you can use the convert command at msdos.Originally posted by machinegunkelly
Last time I installed my XP I did Fat32 and my PC ran like utter shit after a few weeks ,
NTFS seems more stable on this install .
TrafficCashGold Paying Webmasters Since 1996!
Awesome Conversions! Fast Weekly Payments! Over 125 Tours!Comment
-
I guess NTFS is better. I use it!GayPay X2 -- #1in the niche! $35 per sign! Up to 70% revenue share! http://www.gaypay.comComment
-
you would have to be an idiot to install fat32.Need WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]Comment
-
NTFS is better because you can decide how big you want your hard drive sectors to be. This can give you a lot more usable space on your hard drive versus FAT16 and FAT32.SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
agreeOriginally posted by Adultnet
NTFS is much better then fat32 since ntfs is the New Technology file system that Microsoft have developed it is faster, has much more security features and allows to apply security settings per file which is not possible on fat32.
Comment
-
NTFS is phatComment
-
Weird last time i installed it never gave me the fat32 optionSpam link hereComment
-
Or misinformed .Originally posted by sandman!
you would have to be an idiot to install fat32.
Not everyone is an MSCE ya know ;)Comment
-
Yeah, NTFS is better. The only problem is that I keep my windoze installation kit on my hard drive (I hate installing it from a CD), so if there's a problem and I have to reinstall windoze, I have to do this within a MSDOS session, and MSDOS don't recognize NTFS, so I'm in deep shit. That happened to me a couple of times, and from then on FAT32 is the anwer for me... Pretty dumb, huh?Comment
-
NTFS will save more space, but if you plan on installing an OS like win98 then you need fat32.Comment
-
I'm pretty sure that FAT 32 doesn't handle files over 4 (or 5??) GB.Comment
-
Fat32 can handle large files ...Originally posted by mattyboy
I'm pretty sure that FAT 32 doesn't handle files over 4 (or 5??) GB.
TrafficCashGold Paying Webmasters Since 1996!
Awesome Conversions! Fast Weekly Payments! Over 125 Tours!Comment
-
F the microcrap stuff and go with the penguin, linux is a much better os and works well on the desktop if you have the time to make it all work. Otherwise NTFS cant be beatComment
-
Thats is the dumbest reason i can think of for using fat32.Originally posted by fishy
Yeah, NTFS is better. The only problem is that I keep my windoze installation kit on my hard drive (I hate installing it from a CD), so if there's a problem and I have to reinstall windoze, I have to do this within a MSDOS session, and MSDOS don't recognize NTFS, so I'm in deep shit. That happened to me a couple of times, and from then on FAT32 is the anwer for me... Pretty dumb, huh?
There is no reason not to install windows from a CDNeed WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]Comment
-
lolOriginally posted by sandman!
Thats is the dumbest reason i can think of for using fat32.
There is no reason not to install windows from a CD
TrafficCashGold Paying Webmasters Since 1996!
Awesome Conversions! Fast Weekly Payments! Over 125 Tours!Comment
-
I am the fat32 vote btw.
I never go with the flow.
Comment
-
Care to say why? I've had it with Fat32.. recently changed to NTFS.. shouldn't of been so stubbornOriginally posted by NickPapageorgio
I am the fat32 vote btw.
I never go with the flow.
Comment
-
Keep the drive FAT! if you want to repartician the drive later you will have problems with NTFSComment
-
Cause everyone else voted NTFS and I am fat too so I can kind of relate more to fat32.Originally posted by Project-Shadow
Care to say why? I've had it with Fat32.. recently changed to NTFS.. shouldn't of been so stubborn
**Please nominate this post for stupidest response of the day, thank you.**Comment
-
I'm not sure about that.Originally posted by Adultnet
Fat32 can handle large files ...
I had to do some DVD ripping and the output files were a couple gigs big
I was told i had to use NTFS
but then my windows98 couldn't do that, so i had to upgrade to XPSpank me
Dude, where's my traffic?Comment
-
Uhm.. NTFS! I didn't even need to think about it.
www.ogrish.comComment
Comment