View Single Post
Old 06-10-2002, 01:56 AM  
codecrawler
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: wolfshade's basement
Posts: 297
:stoned

My circlejerking projects? By all means I always ran CJ's and probably will untill the day I die

If you like to discuss em here I am buddy Watcha need trading tips?

As for your other remarks funny how you ignore the facts I posted allong with my accusations.

As for being off topic listen it's your idea and you proposed it here, I think before people go along with it (or not as in my case) they should know who they will be working with. so while not the topic itself it has a close relation with it.

And once again I backed everything I mentioned with proof Hun or do you deny bringing Shane's server down?

To get on topic:

It's funny how bad informed you are on copyright laws( well sad actually I can however recommend a good lawyer)

Let it be said that I'm no fan of APIC but some info on their site is very usefull. You should read it sometime it might change your opinion on what you posted in your reply.

In fact how can somebody this ill informed weed out cheaters with stolen content anyway? When running a freehosting service I dealt with copyright issues every day I know exactly what you legally can and can't do. And what you do is illegal!

After 10 years of running the Yellow Pages you really should know better.

But to help you out:

Fact 1: There is no such thing as public domain

Fact 2 99.9 % of celeb content is illegal. and that 0.1% is pornstar content often posted by the pornstar herself *LOL*

If you don't believe me try to buy some!

So my final input on this topic is:

I am against it because:

1 I have no faith in the one working on it due to reasons I posted all over this thread.

2 The display of information on legalities is way to poor to ever hope to get an effective system in place.

3 It only benefits the TGP siteowner and only makes it harder for the gallerybuilder

4 Using a CC as verification is not acceptable because:

- Using a CC online is still wayy to risky IMHO
- To easy to fake
- To many people without one to be fair

5 I think it's a money scheme

A final thought on the matter:

People,

Weeding out cheaters is an honourable goal, however the means as proposed here are not the way IMHO a system like that I think will work for a very short period and then cheaters will have a way around it. The result you're back to square 1 only now you have a better educated and more experienced cheater on your hands.

My solution use the scipts and reviewers to sort it out, use bots to check links daily but most of all let every TGP do this by themselves in any way they see fit. It is the TGP siteowners choice to run a TGP and therefor his/her responsibility to weed out the bad seeds. No system should govern it only the TGP owner him/herself, no matter who runs it.

How's that for on topic?

Cheers!
CC
__________________


WE ARE TGP2 RESISTANCE IS FUTILE YOU WILL BE CONVERTED!!!
codecrawler is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote