I'm sure this has been posted before, but I just saw it for the first time. It must be a fake:
http://themaxx.com/offensive/pages/p......ooh.jpg.php
http://themaxx.com/offensive/pages/p......ooh.jpg.php
-
Last edited by Donny; 07-11-2004, 09:06 AM. -
Hahah nice hotlink image
-
looks real to me
LOL
Comment
-
Fuck, even posting the link didn't work. Here it is:
Comment
-
lolOriginally posted by sumphatpimp
looks real to me
LOL
Comment
-
I didnt need to see thatYour leader for Adult SEO Services
19+ Years Serving the Adult/SEO Industry
ICQ: 610-814
Skype: xratedseoComment
-
Darn , sure looks real.Comment
-
No fucking way. Has to be a fake. If not time to squeeze one off.█ joesmut (a) gmail Dot com
█ Full Stack DeveloperComment
-
Originally posted by PussyMan
Darn , sure looks real
If it was a fake, it was a REALLY GOOD JOB!Comment
-
fake for sure..
Comment
-
Why, because the idea of it being real is too good to be true?Originally posted by quantum-x
fake for sure..
Comment
-
Either it's a fake, or there's a 95% chance that you posted a picture of underage pussy. Good going, sparky./(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Any idea where this was taken?Comment
-
Originally posted by punkworld
Either it's a fake, or there's a 95% chance that you posted a picture of underage pussy. Good going, sparky.the hun gets revenue from pre-paid gallery placements on the top 15 spaces and banners.
the rest of thegalleries are free placements.Comment
-
If it is a fake then it is a mighty good one. Also notice the pink tank-top she is wearing, she isn't wearing a bra and you can make out her nipples too.Comment
-
Originally posted by punkworld
Either it's a fake, or there's a 95% chance that you posted a picture of underage pussy. Good going, sparky.
**IF** that were true, it's not a pornographic photo, and therefore not illegal. Ever heard of Jock Sturges? No? You can get his books on Amazon.com or at Barnes and Noble. His subjects are all under 18 and are all nude, but no pornographic. Don't believe me? Look in the photography section the next time you're in Barnes and Noble. Or just look here on Amazon.com :
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...881270-6631866Last edited by Donny; 07-11-2004, 09:26 AM.Comment
-
Legs have too much meat on them to belong to either Olsen twin....Comment
-
-
looks good to me
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.Comment
-
when you sit the back of your leg gets flattened and the "meat" gets pushed out making it appear largerOriginally posted by mardigras
Legs have too much meat on them to belong to either Olsen twin...
Comment
-
The higher up her skirt the lighter it gets. Now the photographer took this pic standing higher than her. The upskirt part looks like a flash is taken from below. A flash from above (this is the case here) wouldve been partly blocked by the skirt and instead of getting lighter there it shouldve gotten darker.Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
Fuck, even posting the link didn't work. Here it is:
Comment
-
Who said anything about it being illegal?Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
**IF** that were true, it's not a pornographic photo, and therefore not illegal. Ever heard of Jock Sturges? No? You can get his books on Amazon.com or at Barnes and Noble. His subjects are all under 18 and are all nude, but no pornographic. Don't believe me? Look in the photography section the next time you're in Barnes and Noble. Or just look here on Amazon.com :
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/se...881270-6631866
However, would you consider it a good idea to post artistic nudes of underage girls on the world's leading porn webmaster board in terms of PR, good taste, etc?
Underage pussy, whether legal or illegal, does not belong on industry-related boards. Simple as that./(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
And the one on the left looks fucking scary. Fuck these chicks look weird, yuck.Comment
-
If it is fake I'd still like to see the original.
no sigComment
-
Originally posted by punkworld
Who said anything about it being illegal?
However, would you consider it a good idea to post artistic nudes of underage girls on the world's leading porn webmaster board in terms of PR, good taste, etc?
Underage pussy, whether legal or illegal, does not belong on industry-related boards. Simple as that.
If you're offended by this photo, which may or may not have been taken after the girls turned 18, move along. Seriously. Who knows when this photo was taken. I'm saying it was taken after they turned 18. You may fantasize that it was before if you wish.Comment
-
My guess is the whole bottom part is fake. I dont think those are her legs. The skin color looks totally different than the rest of her body.
Maybe im wrong tho.Comment
-
I'm not offended by it, I just think it's kinda dumb to post it here.Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
If you're offended by this photo, which may or may not have been taken after the girls turned 18, move along. Seriously. Who knows when this photo was taken. I'm saying it was taken after they turned 18. You may fantasize that it was before if you wish.
Aside from that... don't you shoot content? Always nice to hear people who create content say sensible stuff like "Who knows when this photo was taken. I'm saying it was taken after they turned 18.".
/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Originally posted by punkworld
I'm not offended by it, I just think it's kinda dumb to post it here.
Aside from that... don't you shoot content? Always nice to hear people who create content say sensible stuff like "Who knows when this photo was taken. I'm saying it was taken after they turned 18.".
You're grasping at straws, asshole. These are celebrities we're talking about here. These are shots that would likely have been taken by the papperazzi, if real. These are photos that will not be subject to 2257 laws. These girls are 18 years old, but it doesn't really matter in a situation like this... stop trying to stir shit. Is that all you're good for?Comment
-
You see from a mile away that it is fake.Comment
-
Its a fake for sure.
Looks like they are on the subway.
Now ask yourself, why would 2 chicks who are worth bout 300,000,000 dollars be on the subway?Comment
-
-
That's a weak argument. There are a million different ways to explain such a thing.Originally posted by Za Ha
Its a fake for sure.
Looks like they are on the subway.
Now ask yourself, why would 2 chicks who are worth bout 300,000,000 dollars be on the subway?Comment
-
Please explain.Originally posted by spunky1
So fake it's funnyComment
-
Sometimes it amazes me how utterly devoid of intelligence some people are. You are one of those people, as you have quite aptly proven in this thread.Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
You're grasping at straws, asshole. These are celebrities we're talking about here. These are shots that would likely have been taken by the papperazzi, if real. These are photos that will not be subject to 2257 laws. These girls are 18 years old, but it doesn't really matter in a situation like this... stop trying to stir shit. Is that all you're good for?
Like I already said, this is not about the law. This is about how "on the biggest adult webmaster board in the world people post pictures of underage nudity" will sound to the average consumer/voter being rallied up against the porn industry by some Asshahahahaha-like asshole.
And no, "but it's ok, they're celebrities!" does not make it sound better. Neither does "but they're pictures of fake underage nudity!". And, not too surprisingly, "I have no clue but I say they're 18+ in that picture" doesn't make it much better either.
The porn industry needs to keep as far away as possible from possible minors. If not because of the law, at least because of PR. Anyone with half a brain should realize that.
Moron./(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
looks like a really good fake, her legs are too thick and tanner than the rest of her body.Comment
-
Originally posted by punkworld
Sometimes it amazes me how utterly devoid of intelligence some people are... blah blah blah blah.... ramble ramble ramble ramble...
Give it up, dumb fuck. You're just being argumentative.Comment
-
punkworld, man you're reaching way to far .... there is nothing illegal about that pic if it is real.In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.Comment
-
NO shit its fake! Those girls legs are going to be skinny as shitComment
-
So yeah, lunch on me fellas. Why can't we all just be friends?Originally posted by punkworld
Sometimes it amazes me how utterly devoid of intelligence some people are. You are one of those people, as you have quite aptly proven in this thread.
Like I already said, this is not about the law. This is about how "on the biggest adult webmaster board in the world people post pictures of underage nudity" will sound to the average consumer/voter being rallied up against the porn industry by some Asshahahahaha-like asshole.
And no, "but it's ok, they're celebrities!" does not make it sound better. Neither does "but they're pictures of fake underage nudity!". And, not too surprisingly, "I have no clue but I say they're 18+ in that picture" doesn't make it much better either.
The porn industry needs to keep as far away as possible from possible minors. If not because of the law, at least because of PR. Anyone with half a brain should realize that.
Moron.
Comment
-
Actually, in this case I'm not. I'm just annoyed by the fact that some people don't seem to see how a public webmaster board is different than a surfer board in that it also acts as a representation of the entire industry.Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
Give it up, dumb fuck. You're just being argumentative.
Anything you say here can and will be used by those fighting against the industry. Staying away from borderline stuff is always a good idea in such situations./(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Originally posted by serious
looks like a really good fake, her legs are too thick and tanner than the rest of her body.
but her hands kinda look dark... and if you're good with photoshop, which this guy is, it would have been a given to make her legs lighter....
btw.. she also got the see-thru shirt..Comment
-
fakeComment
-
Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
Fuck, even posting the link didn't work. Here it is:
i just noticed we can see a little bit of her nipple through her shirt!
Chaturbate Affiliate Support: [email protected]Comment
-
-
i think its a fake
there heads are so huge
and they look like they are posing
and you wouldnt pose , sitting like this if you arent wearing any undies
NichePay - $30 on all trials - Killer Ratios
..................................................
Female Ejaculation - Hairy - Shemale
Puffy Nipples - Huge Clits - And More!
..................................................Comment
-
I think it is probably fake, but they did a great job
Comment
-
-
Fake.Comment
-
-
49 Olsen Upskirts...
Comment
Comment