Surprise: U.S. Mulling How to Delay Nov. Vote in Case of Attack

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • directfiesta
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Oct 2002
    • 30203

    #1

    Surprise: U.S. Mulling How to Delay Nov. Vote in Case of Attack

    I don't know why this doesn't surprise me...
    Maybe the risks of attack will rise in rapport to the polls showing Bush going down....


    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. counterterrorism officials are looking at an emergency proposal on the legal steps needed to postpone the November presidential election in case of an attack by al Qaeda, Newsweek reported on Sunday.



    Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge warned last week that Osama bin Laden (news - web sites)'s al Qaeda network may attack within the United States to try to disrupt the election.


    The magazine cited unnamed sources who told it that the Department of Homeland Security asked the Justice Department (news - web sites) last week to review what legal steps would be needed to delay the election if an attack occurred on the day before or the day of the election.


    The department was asked to review a letter to Ridge from DeForest Soaries, who is the chairman of the new U.S. Election Assistance Commission, the magazine said.


    The commission was created in 2002 to provide funds to the states to the replace punch card voting systems and provide other assistance in conducting federal elections.

    In his letter, Soaries pointed out that while New York's Board of Elections suspended primary elections in New York on the day of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, "the federal government has no agency that has the statutory authority to cancel and reschedule a federal election."

    Soaries wants Ridge to ask Congress to pass legislation giving the government such power, Newsweek reported in its latest issue that hits the newsstands on Monday.

    Homeland Security Department spokesman Brian Rochrkasse told the magazine the agency is reviewing the matter "to determine what steps need to be taken to secure the election."
    Or will election in America be similar to the one in Baghdad: one candidate only ...

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...tion_terror_dc
    I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

    But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
  • The Bootyologist
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jun 2004
    • 2912

    #2
    Third time I've read essentially the smae story. When will this trickle out to mainstream media? It's scary as all hell

    Comment

    • David!
      By the wrath of Agamemnon
      • Apr 2004
      • 6501

      #3
      I don't think it would be wise to go ahead with elections if we suffer a major attack like it's being talked about.
      And considering they plan on taking out 1 or both candidates
      .

      Comment

      • MasterBlogger
        So Fucking Banned
        • Jan 2004
        • 1635

        #4
        Originally posted by directfiesta
        I don't know why this doesn't surprise me...
        Maybe the risks of attack will rise in rapport to the polls showing Bush going down....

        Your statement has historical roots - unfortunately.

        Comment

        • Elli
          Reach for those stars!
          • Apr 2003
          • 17991

          #5
          hahhahahhahahha

          omg they can't pull this one off, can they?

          How do you stay in power longer than you should? You declare a State of Emergency. That's how Hitler made himself King Dictator or whatever the hell he made himself.

          So they wait until they "win" the war and they sway the people back to their side, THEN they let them vote. How diabolically evil. You can't write a story this good.

          Try reading this in a new light:
          "Homeland Security Department spokesman Brian Rochrkasse told the magazine the agency is reviewing the matter "to determine what steps need to be taken to secure the election." "

          Secure may not mean to make the election safe, it may mean WINNING the election..
          Last edited by Elli; 07-11-2004, 09:06 AM.
          email: [email protected]

          Comment

          • Roger
            Confirmed User
            • Jul 2003
            • 3181

            #6
            Funny how much power Al-Qaeda have all of a sudden. Now they can actually delay US elections.

            Comment

            • Paul Waters
              Confirmed User
              • Mar 2003
              • 4402

              #7
              Can we say that Osama Bin Laden is Bush's number one fan, and he will go to any steps necessary to ensure that Bush is re-elected?

              See today's post I made about Doonesbury.



              Paul

              Comment

              • Elli
                Reach for those stars!
                • Apr 2003
                • 17991

                #8
                Originally posted by Paul Waters
                Can we say that Osama Bin Laden is Bush's number one fan, and he will go to any steps necessary to ensure that Bush is re-elected?

                See today's post I made about Doonesbury.

                Nice
                email: [email protected]

                Comment

                • crockett
                  in a van by the river
                  • May 2003
                  • 76818

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Roger
                  Funny how much power Al-Qaeda have all of a sudden. Now they can actually delay US elections.
                  well I can't say if this is a good thing or bad... I mean think about it what if early on election day a few car bombs go off around the country at voting booths. That would defiantly stop people from going to vote could affect the out come.. It dosen't have to be a major attack like on 9-11.


                  However I don't want Bush in office another day, but the race is so close right now the election could come down to a few hundred votes just like the last one.
                  In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                  Comment

                  • directfiesta
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 30203

                    #10
                    But let's see the positive side:

                    Democracy now exists in ... IRAQ



                    Just need IRAQ to invade ( liberate ) the US and were are back to square one....
                    I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                    But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                    Comment

                    • directfiesta
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 30203

                      #11
                      Originally posted by crockett



                      However I don't want Bush in office another day, but the race is so close right now the election could come down to a few hundred votes just like the last one.
                      Last one was not about votes ...
                      I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                      But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                      Comment

                      • ParasiteTV
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 1067

                        #12
                        Originally posted by PussyMan
                        I don't think it would be wise to go ahead with elections if we suffer a major attack like it's being talked about.
                        And considering they plan on taking out 1 or both candidates
                        take em both out.

                        anarchy in the us.

                        that should get rid of all the shite genes that infest that counrty.

                        vote natural selection!

                        Comment

                        • warlock5
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 2808

                          #13
                          The funny thing is rush limbough and/or other right wingers were speculating that bill clinton would pull something off so he could serve 3 terms. Now they are claiming that clinton doesn't want kerry to win so that hillary can be president.

                          Comment

                          • Elli
                            Reach for those stars!
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 17991

                            #14
                            Originally posted by directfiesta
                            But let's see the positive side:

                            Democracy now exists in ... IRAQ



                            Just need IRAQ to invade ( liberate ) the US and were are back to square one....
                            Did they vote on their current leader? I thought he was selected by the American govt?
                            email: [email protected]

                            Comment

                            • Rochard
                              Jägermeister Test Pilot
                              • Dec 2001
                              • 75764

                              #15
                              The United States Government has emergency plans to cover everything. I'm sure this is a step taken every four years, only now it's getting more press because it's more of a reality.

                              Some time ago it was released that Bush asked for plans to invade Iraq long before it was even seriously considered. What wasn't released to the general public is that the US has plans to invade every country, including Mexico and Canada, in the "event of an emergency".

                              I'm not sure about you guys, but I know that I have plans to cover all bases in the adult industry. What would happen if credit card billing was become illegal in the US, or if porn sites were to suddenly become illegal in the US? Thus, you make plans for such events and take certain actions to protect yourself in the even of an emergency. This is no different.

                              If car bombs was to go off in Washington DC on the morning of election day I don't think it would change much. Perhaps the voter turnout would be a bit smaller. Doesn't matter - you vote for one idiot or another.
                              Herschel Savage
                              Brooklyn, NY

                              Comment

                              • volante
                                Confirmed User
                                • Mar 2002
                                • 2940

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Elli
                                Did they vote on their current leader? I thought he was selected by the American govt?
                                But he was selected by a democratically elected George Dubya, so it MUST be fair...

                                Comment

                                • theDUDE78
                                  Registered User
                                  • Apr 2004
                                  • 44

                                  #17
                                  considering the last attack closed off numerous institutions [buildings, offices, airports, roads, schools k-XX, tv, radio, etc] i dont see how an election could happen if it WASNT postponed. might as well go a step further and say bush is planning an attack to delay the election and attempt to gain backlash votes.

                                  /puts on tinfoil hat
                                  just another dude

                                  Comment

                                  • Scootermuze
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Dec 2001
                                    • 4513

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by RocHard

                                    ...............
                                    If car bombs was to go off in Washington DC on the morning of election day I don't think it would change much. Perhaps the voter turnout would be a bit smaller. Doesn't matter - you vote for one idiot or another.
                                    It would give Bush & Co. a reason to pull some sort of election postponing due to terrorist activity in the U.S. ..

                                    And I can see that very thing 'conveniently' happening..

                                    Comment

                                    • bjjb
                                      Have laptop will travel
                                      • Mar 2004
                                      • 13074

                                      #19
                                      Since federal elections are mandated by the US constitution, wouldnt it take a constitutional ammendment to "legally" change the dates of elections? Guess in war times it doesnt matter. All constitutional freedoms go right out the window in the search for the "good" of the people.

                                      Comment

                                      • theDUDE78
                                        Registered User
                                        • Apr 2004
                                        • 44

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by bjjb
                                        Since federal elections are mandated by the US constitution, wouldnt it take a constitutional ammendment to "legally" change the dates of elections? Guess in war times it doesnt matter. All constitutional freedoms go right out the window in the search for the "good" of the people.
                                        nope, i believe its ok. weather is one example that has previously been a threat.
                                        just another dude

                                        Comment

                                        • theking
                                          Nice Kitty
                                          • Sep 2002
                                          • 21053

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by directfiesta
                                          I don't know why this doesn't surprise me...
                                          It does not surprise me either...as they would be derelict in their duty if there was not a contingency plan.
                                          When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                          FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                          Comment

                                          • genomega
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Feb 2002
                                            • 1190

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by warlock5
                                            The funny thing is rush limbough and/or other right wingers were speculating that bill clinton would pull something off so he could serve 3 terms. Now they are claiming that clinton doesn't want kerry to win so that hillary can be president.
                                            Clinton got rid of Dean no problem. If Hillary wants to run in 2008 then Kerry has to loose.

                                            Special this week tinfoil hats 5.95 plus shipping.


                                            No Jerk TGP
                                            Gallery Monitor
                                            MoneyBookers

                                            Comment

                                            • Jason Fromm
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Jun 2004
                                              • 369

                                              #23
                                              There used to be a provision in our legislation that stated in times
                                              of war elections can be postponed. That was removed a long time ago, but that does not mean it can not be brought back. News likes this needs to be mainstreamed to the public and then I doubt that it would pass; but who knows.
                                              Jason Fromm


                                              ICQ 240845568
                                              [email protected]

                                              Comment

                                              • theking
                                                Nice Kitty
                                                • Sep 2002
                                                • 21053

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Jason Fromm
                                                There used to be a provision in our legislation that stated in times
                                                of war elections can be postponed. That was removed a long time ago, but that does not mean it can not be brought back. News likes this needs to be mainstreamed to the public and then I doubt that it would pass; but who knows.
                                                It is being reported in mainstream media...print and TV.
                                                When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                Comment

                                                • Elli
                                                  Reach for those stars!
                                                  • Apr 2003
                                                  • 17991

                                                  #25
                                                  Every time he tries something, I think, "No, they would never let him do that." But then they do, and he does.
                                                  email: [email protected]

                                                  Comment

                                                  • ¹²³
                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                    • Jul 2004
                                                    • 33

                                                    #26

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...