Breaking News: Report slams CIA for Iraq intelligence failures

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roger
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2003
    • 3181

    #51
    Originally posted by genomega
    What do you suppose was in all those convoys running from Iraq to Syria for three weeks before the war started?

    Again, even if we assume that you're right, the fact that Saddam is a coward who'd rather ship his WMD away while his country is under invasion doesn't make him a threat.

    Comment

    • theking
      Nice Kitty
      • Sep 2002
      • 21053

      #52
      Originally posted by Roger
      No it didn't. I watched a documentary long ago that said just that. Maybe previous French intel taken years ago concurred with the US one but certainly not the recent one.

      It was the president who wanted to invade Iraq from the get go. They wanted what they wanted and the CIA provided them with the intel to help them invade Iraq even though the CIA already knew the truth.
      George Tenant testified in open hearings...just a few weeks ago that French intel (among others) concurred...and I personally viewed the hearings. This broadcast was available world wide as well as reported in print media world wide and the French did not deny his testimony. I would say the proof is in the pudding.
      When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

      FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

      Comment

      • Roger
        Confirmed User
        • Jul 2003
        • 3181

        #53
        Originally posted by theking
        George Tenant testified in open hearings...just a few weeks ago that French intel (among others) concurred...and I personally viewed the hearings. This broadcast was available world wide as well as reported in print media world wide and the French did not deny his testimony. I would say the proof is in the pudding.
        Same guy who failed to prevent 9/11, gave false info about WMD's and got fired?

        Comment

        • Tom_PMs
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2004
          • 2049

          #54
          What do you suppose was in all those convoys running from Iraq to Syria for three weeks before the war started?

          *If* thats the case, then perhaps thats the proof that weapons inspectors may have found if a competent leader was in place.

          Further, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

          We sent 11k troops where Bin Laden was. We got him cornered in the mountains. Then inexplicably, the troops told the Afghan fighters to go in and get Bin Laden for us. Pleased to be explaining it?

          BTW: Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

          So then all of a sudden we're talking about Iraq. Why? Only the white house knows, to this day.

          Connection to 9/11? No.
          WMD? No.
          Nukes? No.

          Why? And where the fuck is bin laden, the man responsible for murdering 3000+ civilian lives in the largest attack ever on american soil? Is he in IRAQ???

          God I cant wait until January 1st.

          You've read it, you can't unread it.

          Comment

          • theking
            Nice Kitty
            • Sep 2002
            • 21053

            #55
            Originally posted by Roger
            Same guy who failed to prevent 9/11, gave false info about WMD's and got fired?
            The same guy that provided "wrong" information...yes...but does not alter that fact that France nor Germany denied his statement that they concurred with US intel.
            When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

            FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

            Comment

            • directfiesta
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Oct 2002
              • 30183

              #56
              Originally posted by genomega
              Those nasty facts get in the way again? Just do a search on the un and oil for food and fraud and by the way France ignored all of the un sanctions on iraq.

              I don't have to prove or search... You bring up stories, well back them up. I searched and found nothing .. lol.
              I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

              But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

              Comment

              • directfiesta
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Oct 2002
                • 30183

                #57
                Originally posted by theking
                George Tenant testified in open hearings...just a few weeks ago that French intel (among others) concurred...and I personally viewed the hearings. This broadcast was available world wide as well as reported in print media world wide and the French did not deny his testimony. I would say the proof is in the pudding.
                Who the fuck cares what Tenant sayed... All along it was all false, so so is this.
                I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                Comment

                • Roger
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 3181

                  #58
                  Originally posted by theking
                  The same guy that provided "wrong" information...yes...but does not alter that fact that France nor Germany denied his statement that they concurred with US intel.
                  Deny what? They already said that based on info from intelligence they choose not to invade.

                  If France came out and denied Tenet's testimony, the republicans will be all up in arms about how France is an enemy. So why exactly would they say anything?

                  I don't really trust any government though. If France was a part of the coalition they to would've given false info. It's all about politics.
                  Last edited by Roger; 07-09-2004, 10:10 AM.

                  Comment

                  • theking
                    Nice Kitty
                    • Sep 2002
                    • 21053

                    #59
                    Originally posted by directfiesta
                    Who the fuck cares what Tenant sayed... All along it was all false, so so is this.
                    You clearly care what is said by George Tenant and everyone else in US Government as you bash those in the US Government daily.
                    When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                    FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                    Comment

                    • theking
                      Nice Kitty
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 21053

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Roger
                      Deny what? They already said that based on info from intelligence they choose not to invade.
                      That is not a correct description of the position France took pior to the US invasion.
                      Last edited by theking; 07-09-2004, 10:28 AM.
                      When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                      FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                      Comment

                      • loverboy
                        When it rains, it pours
                        • May 2003
                        • 20609

                        #61
                        now the Iraqi people has the very right to be mad and hope they not retaliate on this revelation.

                        Comment

                        Working...