Originally posted by mdcq actually shes not that bad. just something bout that pic.
Yes he's a crap pornographer.
He can get the exposure right, the poses right and he's got a model in front of the camera. But that's it.
Porn is mental, it generates sexual thoughts in the viewer. To produce it you have to make a model look hot and horny. Models have to make the viewer think they're about to fuck, are fucking for pleasure and the viewer could have joined in, if he'd been there. I'm talking about normal porn, not abuse porn.
The most frightening thing about these picture is the shooter continues to put them up on a board, not knowing a thing about what he's posting.
If you want to sell a cake you don't put up picture af flour, milk and eggs. Porn is slightly more than a girl in front of a camera.
But then WTF do I know I'm just an old man getting his rocks off.
The other scary thing is the guys here who think she's cute. vWonder how many would pay $30 a maonth to look at her? And that's what it's all about.
Last edited by Paul Markham; 07-02-2004, 12:05 AM.
they look way to young to be legal. Whether they are or not doesn't matter because it's disturbing to think of people fantasizing over girls that look like kids - it's the same thing as real kids if you ask me.
Comment