quality of galleries on madthumbs these days.

**polish_aristocrat** · 04-29-2005, 04:03 AM

Hun lists even shittier galleries

**spooky181** · 04-29-2005, 04:11 AM

Obviously made that way so as to make $$$

**Mefo** · 04-29-2005, 04:14 AM

Whats wrong with that gallery? It doesn't look flashy with designs and shit but it might convert really good....

**shima** · 04-29-2005, 04:18 AM

Maybe its The Power Of Simplicity?

**theFeTiShLaDy** · 04-29-2005, 04:19 AM

well, sometimes simple galleries convert better because surfers are more focused on the content.

**selena** · 04-29-2005, 04:22 AM

I can see where the simple design might work well. It drives me nuts when people do their thumbs like that though. Seeing a chopped off torso is really inticing.

**Dirty F** · 04-29-2005, 04:23 AM

I did galleries like that in the past and have to say they generally work better than the fancy ones.

**Dirty F** · 04-29-2005, 04:25 AM

Its quite sad but there are 2 reasons why we are making "high quality" galleries.

To please the affiliate and to please the webmaster of the tgp.

Does the surfer care? No. He looks at the content, not the design. If he likes it he will click the link which in the gallery above is clearly visible.

**fris** · 04-29-2005, 04:27 AM

Originally posted by Franck

Its quite sad but there are 2 reasons why we are making "high quality" galleries.

To please the affiliate and to please the webmaster of the tgp.

Does the surfer care? No. He looks at the content, not the design. If he likes it he will click the link which in the gallery above is clearly visible.

agree. my galleries that get on thehun look exactly like that.

but others to get on pinkworld, and other tgps/mgps have to look topnotch. is what i am saying.

thehun would rather list a gallery with thumbs and a background

but its diff with tgps with 100k+ traffic

**Paparazzi** · 04-29-2005, 04:28 AM

Originally posted by fris

i know some people work hard to get a good quality gallery and good converting. to even get listed. but comon look at this garbage.

http://www.camsteens.com/peaches18/6...npr_CndyC.html

my friends 5 year old son can do better

I don't see any problem with that gall. Simple galleries convert good for me...

**XxXotic** · 04-29-2005, 04:38 AM

camsteens - owned by cam of madthumbs... that's one of HIS galleries, wtf do YOU care what he lists on his site? especially when they're his OWN galleries.

**SomeCreep** · 04-29-2005, 04:48 AM

Originally posted by fris

look at this garbage.

http://www.camsteens.com/peaches18/6...npr_CndyC.html

my friends 5 year old son can do better

Originally posted by XxXotic

camsteens - owned by cam of madthumbs... that's one of HIS galleries, wtf do YOU care what he lists on his site? especially when they're his OWN galleries.

**Theo** · 04-29-2005, 04:54 AM

lol somecreep

**cool1** · 04-29-2005, 05:16 AM

I like the simplicity of it. very clean.

**AdultNex** · 04-29-2005, 05:31 AM

Simple converts.

'Nuff said.

**Dalai lama** · 04-29-2005, 05:40 AM

what's wrong with that gallery? Content is looking damn good.

**Terenzo** · 04-29-2005, 06:49 AM

seems someone has stolen one of my designs!

**Wilbo** · 04-29-2005, 06:53 AM

Originally posted by Terenzo

seems someone has stolen one of my designs!

Exactly what I was thinking........I wonder if I should sue?

**tungsten** · 04-29-2005, 06:53 AM

i see nothing wrong with that gallery..

**SGS** · 04-29-2005, 07:01 AM

The gallery looks fine to me. Nice and simple with good content.

**sickkittens** · 04-29-2005, 07:03 AM

Originally posted by Franck

Its quite sad but there are 2 reasons why we are making "high quality" galleries.

To please the affiliate and to please the webmaster of the tgp.

Does the surfer care? No. He looks at the content, not the design. If he likes it he will click the link which in the gallery above is clearly visible.

Indeed. I converted way better back in the day w/ simple pages, esp. cam girl profiles. The cheesier the better.

**sickkittens** · 04-29-2005, 07:04 AM

Originally posted by tungsten

i see nothing wrong with that gallery..

There's nothing wrong with it, he's just stating how simple things are vs. what's mostly out there on top TGP's.

**Lensman** · 04-29-2005, 07:05 AM

Sometimes the super plain galleries work better than the heavily designed ones.

**VeriSexy** · 04-29-2005, 07:06 AM

Nothing wrong with it, I wish more TGPs would list simple gallerys

quality of galleries on madthumbs these days.

quality of galleries on madthumbs these days.

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment